Introduction
On 30 January 2020, as a consequence of the globally deteriorating epidemiological situation, WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus declared the COVID-19 situation to be a public health emergency of international concern.1 The global health disaster has been exacerbated by a concomitant epidemic of misinformation online, which has been referred to as an ‘infodemic’.2 The prominent feature of this infodemic is an epidemic-like circulation of fake news, which includes scientific misinformation about COVID-19 and vaccines.3 Misinformation circulates through digital channels faster and more effectively than accurate information does.4 Through social media in particular,5 6 unfounded rumours and conspiracy theories can have a broad reach, greatly contributing to people’s beliefs and behaviours. Scientific misinformation has been a large challenge for the implementation of solutions to halt the ongoing pandemic, and high rates of vaccine hesitancy have been a deterrent to a successful management of COVID-19. COVID-19 misinformation is driven by conspiracy theories on the origin of the pandemic, on the dangers posed by global vaccination campaigns or by inaccurate measures to prevent or treat the disease.7 8 For instance, one of the most popular conspiracy theories on the origin of the pandemic proposes that the outbreak was a plan to mitigate overpopulation through the employment of massive vaccination campaigns. Other popular conspiracies propose that 5G technology causes illnesses due to electromagnetic radiation and that the pandemic serves as a cover for the health damages caused by the new technology. These conspiracies have had real-life effects, with people burning 5G masts or attacking telecommunication workers.9 10 Furthermore, misinformation reduced adherence to mask regulations and social distancing measures,3 due to the broad misunderstanding of the mechanisms of SARS-CoV-2 transmission, COVID-19 symptoms or the concept of herd immunity. All these factors have had profound negative effects on the perception of the dangers posed by COVID-19.
In this process, political trust has been shown to play a direct and indirect role, proving that rumours and misinformation can spread from corners of the internet as well as from institutional figures.11 As an example, in 2020 a prominent political figure erroneously stated that chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine were approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of COVID-19.12 This was followed by a large request for these drugs, causing a shortage of medical supplies for those patients suffering from diseases which require chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine.13 Misguided trust mixed with misinformation also led people to inhale disinfectants, to get exposed to ultraviolet radiation to kill the virus, as well as to create cocktails of drugs to make vaccines. For example, drinking methanol has caused the death of at least 300 people in Iran in 2020.14 Therefore, misinformation is an obstacle to control the spread of the disease and minimise infection rates, and it can constitute a direct threat to life.
During the pandemic, private corporations working in the digital and social media sector have been encouraged to adapt their misinformation policies to account for the global health damages that misinformation can cause, while also accounting for the potential dangers this poses on freedom of speech.8 15 16 Misguided trust and misinformation can be challenged through the combined action of myth busting and information production by global health institutions,17 but also through actions taken by digital agencies to reduce circulating misinformation16 as well as through the action of individual digital health influencers,18–21 who are of utmost relevance in creating a functional network of public health providers for accurate information about COVID-19. In this context, ensuring the highest possible turn-out for the ongoing worldwide COVID-19 vaccination campaigns should be a primary objective, as unsuccessful global vaccinations could undermine the efforts to protect the population, in particular vulnerable individuals with advanced age, comorbidities or a compromised immune system. The growth of the antivaccine movement on social media, and related vaccine misinformation online, constitute challenging tests for global health institutions.8 22–24
These challenges cannot be easily overcome without the help of private corporations, which are able to control the flow of information and misinformation. It is therefore absolutely necessary that solutions to fight against misinformation are found together with public institutions and digital agencies.16 In this paper, we highlight the strategies adopted by WHO since the beginning of the pandemic to reduce COVID-19 misinformation, describing the collaborative efforts between WHO and leading tech and digital agencies. These approaches have resulted in the successful reduction and management of COVID-19 misinformation online, have saved many lives and have greatly contributed to the reduction of the global burden on public health caused by the pandemic.