It is with great interest that I read Doherty et al.’s commentary in which the authors express concern about the ethical appropriateness of a randomised controlled trial that had received ethical approval. Doherty et al.’s study serves as a valuable reminder that a study is not ethical simply because it has received ethical approval, as previous studies have also emphasised.1 One might also add that just because a study has reported having obtained ethical approval, it cannot be assumed that the study has adhered to the recommendations of the research ethics committee or informed the committee of its plans in full. Doshi (2020) reported on bioethicist Charles Wiejer’s concern that a randomised controlled trial of malaria vaccine Mosquirix had waived the requirement of informed consent.2 Weijer was quoted as saying “It is difficult to see how a research ethics committee could have approved a waiver of consent for the WHO malaria vaccine pilot cluster randomized trial.”2 These studies raise the question of whether academic journals should play a greater role in scrutinising the ethical appropriateness of studies submitted for publication?
As a doctoral student with a keen interest in public health ethics, I previously attended weekly editorial board meetings of a major scientific journal with the sole purpose of interrogating the submitted studies for ethical issues. In these meetings, I raised serious questions about some of the studies that had r...
It is with great interest that I read Doherty et al.’s commentary in which the authors express concern about the ethical appropriateness of a randomised controlled trial that had received ethical approval. Doherty et al.’s study serves as a valuable reminder that a study is not ethical simply because it has received ethical approval, as previous studies have also emphasised.1 One might also add that just because a study has reported having obtained ethical approval, it cannot be assumed that the study has adhered to the recommendations of the research ethics committee or informed the committee of its plans in full. Doshi (2020) reported on bioethicist Charles Wiejer’s concern that a randomised controlled trial of malaria vaccine Mosquirix had waived the requirement of informed consent.2 Weijer was quoted as saying “It is difficult to see how a research ethics committee could have approved a waiver of consent for the WHO malaria vaccine pilot cluster randomized trial.”2 These studies raise the question of whether academic journals should play a greater role in scrutinising the ethical appropriateness of studies submitted for publication?
As a doctoral student with a keen interest in public health ethics, I previously attended weekly editorial board meetings of a major scientific journal with the sole purpose of interrogating the submitted studies for ethical issues. In these meetings, I raised serious questions about some of the studies that had received ethical approval, which were typically met with shared concern. Whilst the editorial board had numerous scientific experts examining the study designs and methodologies, they did not have a dedicated ‘ethics expert’ responsible for appraising the ethical appropriateness of the submitted studies. The experience left me with doubt that the editorial team had the interest or capacity to proficiently identify ethical issues in the papers submitted for publication.
Doherty et al.’s commentary together with similar published concerns and my own experiences have left me wondering: is it time to explore the pros and cons of appointing ‘ethics experts’ to the editorial boards of peer-reviewed journals?
Yours sincerely,
Dr Robert Torrance
References:
1. Attarwala, H. TGN1412: From Discovery to Disaster. JYP 2010;2:332.
2. Doshi, P. WHO’s malaria vaccine study represents a “serious breach of international ethical standards.” BMJ 2020.368.
How to use heat stable carbetocin and tranexamic acid for postpartum haemorrhage in practice
A. Metin Gülmezoglu1, Sara Rushwan1
1 Concept Foundation, Geneva, Switzerland
We welcome the paper by Tran et al [1]. There are increasing number of options for postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) prevention and management as recommended by WHO and the context is important. We agree that at the national level the first step is to update the national policies including the guidelines and essential medicine lists (EMLs). Since 2019, Concept Foundation and its partners have been working in 14 East and West African sub-Saharan countries to facilitate those updates [2]. We are pleased to report that in 10 out of the 14 countries – Burkina Faso, DRC, Ethiopia, Ghana, Ivory Coast, Liberia, Rwanda, Sierra Leone, South Sudan, and Uganda – the national guideline and/or EML were updated during this period.
The strength of the project lies in the engagement with policy makers, Ministry of Health officials, clinicians, professional associations, and civil society organizations concurrently. However, competing national policy priorities such as COVID-19, timing of the previous updates, political instability and national capacity and leadership (or lack of) can make the updating process long and challenging even when there is an agreement to update. Secondly, even when the updates happen, proactive dissemination and training within the country can also take time. Thirdly, in the...
How to use heat stable carbetocin and tranexamic acid for postpartum haemorrhage in practice
A. Metin Gülmezoglu1, Sara Rushwan1
1 Concept Foundation, Geneva, Switzerland
We welcome the paper by Tran et al [1]. There are increasing number of options for postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) prevention and management as recommended by WHO and the context is important. We agree that at the national level the first step is to update the national policies including the guidelines and essential medicine lists (EMLs). Since 2019, Concept Foundation and its partners have been working in 14 East and West African sub-Saharan countries to facilitate those updates [2]. We are pleased to report that in 10 out of the 14 countries – Burkina Faso, DRC, Ethiopia, Ghana, Ivory Coast, Liberia, Rwanda, Sierra Leone, South Sudan, and Uganda – the national guideline and/or EML were updated during this period.
The strength of the project lies in the engagement with policy makers, Ministry of Health officials, clinicians, professional associations, and civil society organizations concurrently. However, competing national policy priorities such as COVID-19, timing of the previous updates, political instability and national capacity and leadership (or lack of) can make the updating process long and challenging even when there is an agreement to update. Secondly, even when the updates happen, proactive dissemination and training within the country can also take time. Thirdly, in the case of heat-stable carbetocin (HSC), even when policy updates are accomplished, the regulatory approval that is essential for the drug to enter the country can take time.
In 2021, we expanded our collaboration to include the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) and International Confederation of Midwives (ICM) and their national counterparts to support the transition from policy updates to the development of clinical management protocols and job aids. FIGO and ICM developed a generic protocol on PPH prevention and treatment [3] and engagements with key national stakeholders were held to discuss its usability and adaptability to the country context, and how it could support existing country practices. So far, Ethiopia, Ghana, Rwanda, and Uganda have developed a national PPH clinical protocol that has been approved by the Ministry of Health, and these countries will develop supporting job aids. This work is planned to be completed in 4 other countries – Burkina Faso, Liberia, Sierra Leone, and South Sudan.
The main determinant of choosing which drug(s) to use should be the presence of a skilled birth attendant and reliable cold chain and storage. The more established injectable uterotonics must be kept in cold chain and storage, and quality-assured products must be prioritized for procurement. Implementation considerations must include ensuring that staff know and adhere to the fact that HSC is contraindicated for labour induction and augmentation. HSC is often used for PPH treatment, but this is off-label and the benefits and potential harms are uncertain. Both HSC and tranexamic acid (TXA) should be considered for implementation in peripheral and referral levels of the health care system since at peripheral level the cold chain issues are likely to be more prevalent and the lifesaving role of a quality-assured uterotonic and timely administered TXA in cases of haemorrhage is likely to be crucial. The fact that there seems to be support for intramuscular administration for TXA will make implementation at the periphery easier [4]. In referral settings with surgical capacity, it is essential that TXA is kept in a place where accidental mix-up with local anesthetics that are used in intrathecal anesthesia is avoided, since there have been case reports of deaths due to accidental TXA administration into the intrathecal space [5,6].
We also agree that HSC and TXA should be carefully integrated into the health system in an enabling environment and considering the context perspectives mentioned above. Concept Foundation will conduct implementation pilots in Burkina Faso, Ethiopia, Ghana, Sierra Leone, and Uganda to assess appropriate use following training of healthcare providers, and integration of the two medicines into routine PPH care management. The results of this research will be useful in better understanding the enablers and barriers for successful introduction of essential PPH medicines into clinical practice.
Our experience demonstrates that there are several barriers to access essential, heat-stable PPH medicines that require operationalization of end-to-end thinking at the national level. By end-to-end thinking, we mean addressing the challenges from the highest national policy level right down to the practicing care provider in the most peripheral level of health care where childbirth takes place. To date, most existing programs have focused either on policy level change or health care provider behavior change. Our project adopts a holistic approach, that seeks to align normative change, clinical protocol development, pilot implementation, procurement, and product introduction.
Progress in our project presents a great opportunity to allow the objectives and approach to be achieved in most high-burden countries with modest resources. However, there is undoubtedly a greater need for investment in advocacy, training, and dissemination tools to support the implementation of national guidelines in a locally appropriate way, while ensuring the WHO recommendations are reflected accurately.
References:
[1] Tran NT, Schulte-Hillen C, et al. How to use heat-stable carbetocin and tranexamic acid for the prevention and treatment of postpartum haemorrhage in low-resource settings. BMJ Global Health. 2022; 7:e008913.
[2] Concept Foundation, Country Support page. Geneva; 2021. https://www.conceptfoundation.org/what-we-do/country-support/. Accessed April 28, 2022.
[3] International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO), Current FIGO projects, IAP page, Project Resources. London; 2022. https://www.figo.org/improving-access-essential-medicines-reduce-postpar.... Accessed April 29, 2022.
[4] Arribas M, Roberts I, et al. WOMAN-PharmacoTXA trial: Study
protocol for a randomised controlled trial to assess the pharmacokinetics and
pharmacodynamics of intramuscular, intravenous and oral administration of
tranexamic acid in women giving birth by caesarean section. Wellcome Open Res. 2021; 6:157.
[5] Patel S, Robertson B, et al. Catastrophic drug errors involving tranexamic acid administered during spinal anaesthesia. Anaesthesia. 2019; 74: 904-914.
[6] Palanisamy A, Kinsella SM. Spinal tranexamic acid – a new killer in town. Anaesthesia. 2019; 74: 831-833.
The activities in this narrative were supported by funding from MSD, through its MSD for Mothers initiative and are the sole responsibility of the authors. MSD for Mothers is an initiative of Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA
It is a humble request if you could kindly specify the names of villages and areas that you surveyed, as it would be of immense help and guidance.
Thank you
I am extremely puzzled by the lack of any response regarding my proposed comments regarding this article. I've submitted my comments twice, but they have not been published. I cannot imagine why. It appears to be a discretionary censorship, which is of course contrary to BMJ's published editorial policies which generally favor respectful discourse. I would greatly appreciate an explanation and an appeal to a larger panel of BMJ editors.
To repeat...for the third time,... regarding this article:
There is a growing interest in developing evidenced based standards for public health policy initiatives.[1] In response to this effort, Burris et al have put forward their own initial effort to identify the potential effects of laws regulating abortion on women’s health.[2] Unfortunately, they apparently failed to include in their research team anyone with familiarity with the literature regarding the negative physical and psychological effects of coerced and unnecessary abortions. This is not a minor oversight.
Regarding the issue of women’s autonomy, increasing legal access to abortion is a double-edged sword. Easier access makes it easier for women to choose abortion for their own self-interests, but it also makes it easier for those pressuring women into unwanted abortions to abuse women’s rights.[3]
Coerced abortions are especially common among women enslaved in sex trafficking.[4,5] But it is also common within...
I am extremely puzzled by the lack of any response regarding my proposed comments regarding this article. I've submitted my comments twice, but they have not been published. I cannot imagine why. It appears to be a discretionary censorship, which is of course contrary to BMJ's published editorial policies which generally favor respectful discourse. I would greatly appreciate an explanation and an appeal to a larger panel of BMJ editors.
To repeat...for the third time,... regarding this article:
There is a growing interest in developing evidenced based standards for public health policy initiatives.[1] In response to this effort, Burris et al have put forward their own initial effort to identify the potential effects of laws regulating abortion on women’s health.[2] Unfortunately, they apparently failed to include in their research team anyone with familiarity with the literature regarding the negative physical and psychological effects of coerced and unnecessary abortions. This is not a minor oversight.
Regarding the issue of women’s autonomy, increasing legal access to abortion is a double-edged sword. Easier access makes it easier for women to choose abortion for their own self-interests, but it also makes it easier for those pressuring women into unwanted abortions to abuse women’s rights.[3]
Coerced abortions are especially common among women enslaved in sex trafficking.[4,5] But it is also common within households precisely because every pregnancy impacts not just the pregnant woman, but also male partners, parents, employers, and society at large . . . as evidenced by advocates of population control who have sought and implemented public policies that discourage birth.[3]
As many as 64% of American women acknowledging a history of abortion report having felt pressured to abort by others.[6] Similarly, a 2021 study of women seeking abortion found that only 42% described their pregnancy as never wanted.[7] The pressure to abort a pregnancy that might otherwise be welcomed typically comes from their male partners, parents, employers and social services officials.[8]
As might be imagined, negative psychological reactions to abortion are more common when women feel pressured into an abortion or have other conflicting maternal interests and moral beliefs.[6,9] These are just a few of the 15 risk factors identified by the APA for negative psychological reactions. They include: terminating a pregnancy that is wanted or meaningful; perceived pressure from others to terminate a pregnancy; perceived opposition to the abortion from partners, family, and/or friends; lack of perceived social support from others; various personality traits (e.g., low self-esteem, a pessimistic outlook, low-perceived control over life); a history of mental health problems prior to the pregnancy; feelings of stigma; perceived need for secrecy; exposure to antiabortion picketing; use of avoidance and denial coping strategies; feelings of commitment to the pregnancy; ambivalence about the abortion decision; low perceived ability to cope with the abortion; history of prior abortion; and late term abortion.[9] The best evidence indicates that the vast majority of women undergoing abortion have one or more of these risk factors.[9]
Even assuming that the negative psychological associated with abortion, including increased risk of substance abuse,[9] postpartum psychiatric risks,[10] sleep disorders,[11] posttraumatic stress disorder,[9] and suicidal ideation and other risk taking behaviors[9] are entirely due to coerced and unwanted abortions, the importance of laws intended to prevent unwanted abortions should not be ignored…but that is precisely what Burris et al have done.
For example, one of the reasons for laws requiring parental involvement or notification are to help prevent a minor from undergoing a coerced abortion at the behest of the male partner or his family. They are also intended to prevent a minor from fearfully consenting to an otherwise unwanted or unnecessary abortion because of a mistaken fear that the minor’s parents will reject her because of her sexual activity and will not support her desire to keep the pregnancy.
But in Table 1, the benefit of “prevention of unwanted, unnecessary or unsafe legal abortions” is not identified in the list of “plausibly related outcomes” for any of the types of laws considered. Nor is there any consideration of “saved costs” and in regard to fewer treatments for the negative health effects associated with unwanted abortion.[9]
Numerous studies have also found a strong link between induced abortion and subsequent pre-mature and low-birth weight deliveries.[12] In the context of the United States, the increased medical costs in treating subsequently pre-maturely born children just to the point of hospital discharge apportions out to approximately $100,000 per 100,000 abortions. Therefore, any reduction in abortion rates that may result from laws that reduce the risk of coerced and unwanted abortions would produce significant health care savings, would reduce the risk of lifelong health complications associated with premature and low birth weight deliveries, and would save numerous lives among later planned pregnancies. But again, none of these benefits appear in Table 1.
Moreover, literally every record linkage study (eleven in total) examining reproductive outcomes associated with mortality has shown that abortion is associated with an increased risk of premature death among women exposed to abortion.[13] There is even a dose effect, with each abortion increasing the risk of an early death by approximately 50 percent.[13] At least a part of this increased risk is due to the increased risk of within a year of an abortion.[14,15] But even if we again assume that all these risks attach only to unwanted abortions (presuming that if a woman truly wants an abortion according to her own guiding lights, she will experience no psychological harm), the fact remains that any law which may help to reduce the rate of unwanted abortions is likely to reduce mortality rates and thereby increase work productivity and gross national product. But, yet again, the positive plausible outcomes have been omitted from Table 1
Notably, “unintended childbirth” is one plausible outcome that Burris et al have associated with every type of law identified in Table 1. But that outcome is poorly defined. When, and how often, is “unintended childbirth” a benefit to women and when is it a harm? Countless women report great satisfaction and blessing from their subsequent delivery of unplanned pregnancies. In fact, the Turnaway Study found that among all the women who were denied a late term abortion, 60% reported being happy about continuing their pregnancies, and by the time the child was born, only 12% still wished they could have had the abortion.[16] The bottom line is that many “unintended” and even “unwanted” pregnancies are associated with a mix of feelings, a mix that in the long run often result in a “welcomed” child, one that is valued not because the child was planned but simply it is the woman’s and her family’s child. Given that Burris et al are arguing for better research to support policy decisions, the importance of better research to identify when and how often unintended pregnancies result in a welcomed child should be a priority, as well as research to identify public policies that can help to make it easier for families to welcome unintended children.
Finally, Burris et al have failed to identify in the list of potential legal interventions laws governing informed consent, risk disclosure and pre-abortion screening for risk factors identifying women who may be at greater risk of being coerced or may feel pressured by social circumstance to agree to an abortion contrary to their moral beliefs and/or maternal desired.
In short, Burris et al’s analysis has failed to fully describe or analyze the plausible effects of statutes and public policies intended to protect women from unwanted, unnecessary and unsafe legal abortions. Simply declaring abortion legal does not necessarily render them safe and effective for all women in any and all circumstances of an “unintended” pregnancy.
Unfortunately, “unintended” pregnancies are often more unwanted by others (including population control activists) than they are by the pregnant themselves. In many cases, women are resiliently willing to embrace their unintended pregnancies as a welcomed-children. Often, it is only the hostility of others, and the accompanying pressure to submit to unwanted abortions, that is the true attack on women’s rights and autonomy.
Laws designed to identify and alleviate the pressures on women to undergo unwanted and unnecessary abortion should be pursued and implemented to save lives, reduce costs, and increase the well-being of both women and their children.
Competing Interest
David Reardon is the Director the Elliot Institute which sponsors peer reviewed medical research, promotes post-abortion healing programs, and advocates for laws requiring pre-abortion screening for coercion and other risk factors associated with negative outcomes for women.
References
1. Rehfuess EA, Stratil JM, Scheel IB, Portela A, Norris SL, Baltussen R. The WHO-INTEGRATE evidence to decision framework version 1.0: integrating WHO norms and values and a complexity perspective. BMJ Glob Heal [Internet]. 2019 Jan 1 [cited 2022 Jan 13];4(Suppl 1):e000844. Available from: https://gh.bmj.com/content/4/Suppl_1/e000844
2. Burris S, Ghorashi AR, Cloud LF, Rebouché R, Skuster P, Lavelanet A. Identifying data for the empirical assessment of law (IDEAL): A realist approach to research gaps on the health effects of abortion law. BMJ Glob Heal [Internet]. 2021 Jun 1 [cited 2022 Jan 13];6(6):e005120. Available from: https://gh.bmj.com/content/6/6/e005120
3. Reardon DC. Abortion decisions and the duty to screen: clinical, ethical, and legal implications of predictive risk factors of post-abortion maladjustment. J Contemp Health Law Policy. 2003;20(1):33–114.
4. Coyle C. Sex Trafficking. In: MacNair RM, editor. Peace Psychology Perspectives on Abortion. Kansas City. MO: Feminism & Nonviolence Studies Association; 2016.
5. Lederer L, Wetzel C. The Health Consequences of Sex Trafficking and Their Implications for Identifying Victims in Healthcare Facilities. Ann Heal Law. 2014;23(1):61.
6. Rue VM, Coleman PK, Rue JJ, Reardon DC. Induced abortion and traumatic stress: A preliminary comparison of American and Russian women. Med Sci Monit. 2004;10(10):SR5–16.
7. Biggs MA, Neilands TB, Kaller S, Wingo E, Ralph LJ. Developing and validating the Psychosocial Burden among people Seeking Abortion Scale (PB-SAS). Vaingankar JA, editor. PLoS One [Internet]. 2020 Dec 10 [cited 2021 Feb 8];15(12 December):e0242463. Available from: https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0242463
8. Elliot Institute. Forced Abortion in America: A Special Report [Internet]. Springfield IL; 2004. Available from: https://afterabortion.org/new-elliot-institute-report-exposed-americas-f...
9. Reardon DC. The abortion and mental health controversy: A comprehensive literature review of common ground agreements, disagreements, actionable recommendations, and research opportunities. SAGE Open Med [Internet]. 2018;6:205031211880762. Available from: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2050312118807624
10. Reardon DC, Craver C. Effects of pregnancy loss on subsequent postpartum mental health: A prospective longitudinal cohort study. Int J Environ Res Public Health [Internet]. 2021 Feb 2 [cited 2021 Mar 17];18(4):1–11. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33672236/
11. Reardon DC, Coleman PK. Relative treatment rates for sleep disorders and sleep disturbances following abortion and childbirth: a prospective record-based study. Sleep. 2006;29(1):105–6.
12. Calhoun BC, Shadigian E, Rooney B. Cost consequences of induced abortion as an attributable risk for preterm birth and impact on informed consent. J Reprod Med. 2007;52(10):929–37.
13. Reardon DC, Thorp JM. Pregnancy associated death in record linkage studies relative to delivery, termination of pregnancy, and natural losses: A systematic review with a narrative synthesis and meta-analysis. SAGE Open Med [Internet]. 2017 Dec 13 [cited 2018 Aug 15];5:205031211774049. Available from: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2050312117740490
14. Gissler M, Berg C, Bouvier-Colle M-H, Buekens P. Injury deaths, suicides and homicides associated with pregnancy, Finland 1987-2000. Eur J Public Health. 2005 Oct;15(5):459–63.
15. Reardon D, Strahan T, Thorp … J. Deaths Associated with Abortion Compared to Childbirth-A Review of New and Old Data and the Medical and Legal Implications [Internet]. J. Contemp. Health …. 2003. Available from: http://heinonlinebackup.com/hol-cgi-bin/get_pdf.cgi?handle=hein.journals...
16. Foster DG. The Turnaway Study: ten years, a thousand women, and the consequences of having--or being denied--an abortion. New York, NY: Scribner; 2020. p. 360.
Dear sir,
We herewith report effects of disruptions on maternal and child health services in Maharashtra, India.
Covid 19- collateral damage on nutrition of women and children, in Maharashtra, India
Phadke M1,Nair R2,Menon P3,Jotkar R4, Saunik S5
India has been battling the Covid 19 pandemic like most other countries of the world. The first two waves, particularly the second wave produced devastating effects on many aspects of human health and welfare .Disease mortality and morbidity was unparalleled. In addition to these direct effects of Covid 19 disease itself, a number of indirect effects of Covid 19 on women, adolescent girls and children occurred. Lockdowns, loss of jobs, decrease in salaries, migration, supply chain disruption, inadequacy and inaccessibility of foods, green vegetables, stoppage of midday meals due to school closures, inadequate distribution of iron folic acid tablets from anganwadis impacted women and children’s nutrition.
Disruptions in maternal health services have been reported 1. We report two observations on occurrence of Neural tube defects and severe acute malnutrition in children during the years from 1st January to 31st December of 2020 and 2021. A team of doctors under the national health program of RBSK(Rashtriya Bal Swasthya Karyakram), examined children for '4Ds' i.e. Defects at birth, Diseases in children, Deficiency conditions and Developmental delays including disabilities. The year...
Dear sir,
We herewith report effects of disruptions on maternal and child health services in Maharashtra, India.
Covid 19- collateral damage on nutrition of women and children, in Maharashtra, India
Phadke M1,Nair R2,Menon P3,Jotkar R4, Saunik S5
India has been battling the Covid 19 pandemic like most other countries of the world. The first two waves, particularly the second wave produced devastating effects on many aspects of human health and welfare .Disease mortality and morbidity was unparalleled. In addition to these direct effects of Covid 19 disease itself, a number of indirect effects of Covid 19 on women, adolescent girls and children occurred. Lockdowns, loss of jobs, decrease in salaries, migration, supply chain disruption, inadequacy and inaccessibility of foods, green vegetables, stoppage of midday meals due to school closures, inadequate distribution of iron folic acid tablets from anganwadis impacted women and children’s nutrition.
Disruptions in maternal health services have been reported 1. We report two observations on occurrence of Neural tube defects and severe acute malnutrition in children during the years from 1st January to 31st December of 2020 and 2021. A team of doctors under the national health program of RBSK(Rashtriya Bal Swasthya Karyakram), examined children for '4Ds' i.e. Defects at birth, Diseases in children, Deficiency conditions and Developmental delays including disabilities. The year 2020 was a reflection of health and nutrition status of adolescent girls, who were married in the pre-Covid years and delivered babies in the year 2020 and children in precovid time. The year 2021 reflected the health and nutrition status of women in the Covid year of 2020 . It also reflected the status of nutrition in children in 2020 i.e. precovid times and 2021 reflecting nutritional insult in 2020.
2121564 children were examined in 2020. 112(0.005%) were detected to have neural tube defects ( NTDs). In 2021, 101(0.02%) had neural tube defects in 516655 babies which are four times that of 2020.(p<0.001). The number of babies born with NTDs were probably affected by Covid induced collateral nutrition insult i.e. folic acid deficiency in women during periconceptional period. Severe acute malnutrition was detected by measuring weight for height below -3SD on WHO growth charts. 7482 children had SAM (0.353%) in 2020 and 7148 (1.38%) children had SAM in 2021. (p<0.001).
Occurrence of SAM is a measure of acute nutritional insult to children . Inadequate nutrition in 2020 manifested in more children developing SAM and the number is four times more than previous year.
We declare no conflict of interest.
1. Sr. Adv, Ex-VC MUHS, Mumbai,
2. Nutrition Specialist, UNICEF, Mumbai,
3. Assoc. Prof, Ped and Med Edu, DYP. Med college, Pune,
4. Sr. Consultant, Pub.health, RJNM,Mumbai,
5. Addl Chief Sec. Govt of Mah,Mumbai, India.
References
1.Zeus Aranda, Thierry Binda, Katherine Tashman,Ananya Tadikon Daniel Maweu,Emma Jean Boley6,Isaac Mphande, Isata Dumbuya, Mariana Montaño, Mary Clisbee, Mc Geofrey Mvula,
Melino Ndayizigiye Meredith Casella Jean-Baptiste, Prince F Varney,Sarah Anyango Karen Ann GrépiJean Bethany Hedt-Gauthier, Isabel R Fulcher on behalf of the Cross-site COVID-19 Syndromic Surveillance Working Group. Disruptions in maternal health service use during the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020: BMJ Global Health 2021 Vol7 issue1http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2021-007247)
With interest we read the recent paper by Caviglia et al, describing the relation between prehospital ambulance time and outcome in terms of maternal and perinatal outcomes in the setting of Sierra Leone1. Sierra Leone has one of the highest rates of maternal (1360 in 100.000 life births) and infant (87 in 1.000 births) mortality worldwide2. The National Emergency Medical Service (NEMS) was designed and started in this country, an effort by or in collaboration with part of the authors of the current manuscript3. The results show that longer prehospital ambulance times are associated with poor outcome. Furthermore, only in the capital and its surroundings the 2-hour target is met in a high percentage of patients, with only 24-65% of patients meeting this mark in the more rural areas of the country. The authors conclude that there are still major geographical barriers for timely access to care, and that any intervention to strengthen the existing primary health system may help reduce maternal and perinatal mortality.
The elaborate NEMS system, including 81 fully equipped and staffed ambulances with a centralized operations centre, was operational since 2018, with the last districts connected to the service in 2019. The system was managed by the local ministry of health and sanitation (MoHS) and funded through the governmental budget, with help from the World Bank, Doctors with Africa (CUAMM, Padua, Italy), the Regional Government of Veneto (Ita...
With interest we read the recent paper by Caviglia et al, describing the relation between prehospital ambulance time and outcome in terms of maternal and perinatal outcomes in the setting of Sierra Leone1. Sierra Leone has one of the highest rates of maternal (1360 in 100.000 life births) and infant (87 in 1.000 births) mortality worldwide2. The National Emergency Medical Service (NEMS) was designed and started in this country, an effort by or in collaboration with part of the authors of the current manuscript3. The results show that longer prehospital ambulance times are associated with poor outcome. Furthermore, only in the capital and its surroundings the 2-hour target is met in a high percentage of patients, with only 24-65% of patients meeting this mark in the more rural areas of the country. The authors conclude that there are still major geographical barriers for timely access to care, and that any intervention to strengthen the existing primary health system may help reduce maternal and perinatal mortality.
The elaborate NEMS system, including 81 fully equipped and staffed ambulances with a centralized operations centre, was operational since 2018, with the last districts connected to the service in 2019. The system was managed by the local ministry of health and sanitation (MoHS) and funded through the governmental budget, with help from the World Bank, Doctors with Africa (CUAMM, Padua, Italy), the Regional Government of Veneto (Italy) and the Research Center in Emergency and Disaster Medicine (CRIMEDIM, Università del Piemonte Orientale, Italy)3. According to the triage classifications, most “red” indications were maternal/perinatal emergencies, making this the most important focus of the service3.
We have seen the contribution of NEMS in our rural 80-bed hospital in Yele, Tonkolili district, with a catchment population of 150.000. The 2 ambulances stationed in our catchment area, together with ambulances sending referrals from elsewhere, presented an average of over 2 patients per 24 hours to our hospital for emergency services. We used NEMS ourselves for referrals to third-line indications upon indication. As a response to this well-functioning service, have scaled down our ambulance services with the number of drivers and vehicles reduced as they were no longer needed. In line with the NEMS-focus, the majority of presentations were maternal/perinatal admissions; we saw frequent advanced stage diseases due to first delays and in some cases second delays in light of the Three Delays framework. Still, despite the impressive pathology, there were many mothers that could receive proper care and return home in stable condition with a healthy newborn.
Fast forward not even 2 years after the connection of the last district, when the NEMS service was released to the MoHS on the first of January 2021. While ambulances frequented the hospital in December 2020, this came to a total stillstand one month later. As of that moment, the number of presentations by NEMS dropped from over 2 patients per day to one patient in the 9 months after. Due to financial troubles, the whole service collapsed. NEMS ambulances are currently gathering dust on the parking lots of governmental hospitals. Inquiry with hospitals in other districts showed a comparable drop in NEMS presentations after release of the service.
The case of NEMS may be a positive and negative example at the same time. The development of a nationwide ambulance service in a low-income country with high maternal and neonatal mortality is to be applauded. During the time NEMS was in service, the authors demonstrate that a respectable percentage of patients can be transferred to a hospital in time despite large distances and poor road conditions. Furthermore, as shorter prehospital times lead to improved outcome, the service was an important part of the health infrastructure of Sierra Leone.
The current situation with a powerless ambulance service is worse than when NEMS came into service. Before, hospitals had their own ambulance services and drivers, and were sometimes able to pick up patients from peripheral health units through intensified communication. Nowadays, hospitals have scaled down on their number of drivers and ambulances due to the presence of NEMS, and NEMS itself is unavailable for transportation of the needy. To us, it is unclear whether mismanagement, a premature program release, actual financial constraints or perhaps even corruption brought the NEMS-program to its current state. As such, the contrary of the research implications came true: due to the unavailability of the service, a lower percentage of mothers is able to reach hospitals, which will inevitably lead to an increase in maternal and neonatal mortality.
In conclusion, the authors demonstrate the NEMS-service has resulted in swift transport of patients to the proper health facilities, thereby reducing the maternal and perinatal mortality. The premature program release to the local government however has resulted in the unavailability of ambulance services, both by NEMS and local hospitals, thereby likely increasing the already worrisome maternal and perinatal mortality. The important lessons are that the development and deployment of an elaborate ambulance service is possible in sub-Saharan African countries, but premature release of such programs to local government that lack sustainable and durable resources to continue programs, may result in a situation that is worse than before the service started.
1 Caviglia M, Putoto G, Conti A, et al. Association between ambulance prehospital time and maternal and perinatal outcomes in Sierra Leone: a countrywide study. BMJ Glob Heal 2021; 6: e007315.
2 Trends in maternal mortality: 1990 to 2015: estimates by WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA, World Bank Group and the United Nations Population Division. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2015. , 2015.
3 Caviglia M, Dell’aringa M, Putoto G, et al. Improving access to healthcare in sierra leone: The role of the newly developed national emergency medical service. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2021; 18: 1–12.
We agree with Sam-Agudu et al. on the importance of equity in public health (1), and for these reasons raise major concerns regarding the remainder of the Commentary’s focus, and similar view prevalent in this Journal (2) and the wider global health community. We respectfully outline these here, as they affect the current health focus being applied to over a billion people in sub-Saharan countries.
Sam-Agudu and co-authors state that ‘Global, equitable access to safe and effective vaccines for all age groups is critical to ending the COVID-19 pandemic’. This statement, reflecting those of the COVAX programme of the World Health Organization (WHO) and other agencies, is flawed. Equity in health means opportunity for good health, based on individual need, not measured by access to a particular pharmaceutical. A vaccine that does not significantly reduce transmission (3,4) will not end a pandemic, and where risk of severity is low from intrinsic or acquired immune status, will not significantly change outcomes. This flawed assertion also ignores costs of vaccination, both in potential adverse effects, and in resource diversion from other health programmes (public health programmes do not operate in isolation).
Regarding the evidence base used to support their argumentation, and related expected benefits of vaccination, much of Sam-Agudu et al.’s arguments are based on the African Forum for Research and Education in Health (AFREhealth) study r...
We agree with Sam-Agudu et al. on the importance of equity in public health (1), and for these reasons raise major concerns regarding the remainder of the Commentary’s focus, and similar view prevalent in this Journal (2) and the wider global health community. We respectfully outline these here, as they affect the current health focus being applied to over a billion people in sub-Saharan countries.
Sam-Agudu and co-authors state that ‘Global, equitable access to safe and effective vaccines for all age groups is critical to ending the COVID-19 pandemic’. This statement, reflecting those of the COVAX programme of the World Health Organization (WHO) and other agencies, is flawed. Equity in health means opportunity for good health, based on individual need, not measured by access to a particular pharmaceutical. A vaccine that does not significantly reduce transmission (3,4) will not end a pandemic, and where risk of severity is low from intrinsic or acquired immune status, will not significantly change outcomes. This flawed assertion also ignores costs of vaccination, both in potential adverse effects, and in resource diversion from other health programmes (public health programmes do not operate in isolation).
Regarding the evidence base used to support their argumentation, and related expected benefits of vaccination, much of Sam-Agudu et al.’s arguments are based on the African Forum for Research and Education in Health (AFREhealth) study recording 39 child deaths among 25 African hospitals across an 8-month period (5). At less than two deaths per hospital over nine months, we contend that this confirms data elsewhere that Covid-19 is in fact a relatively low-burden disease in Africa (6) and of low impact in children (7). We suggest that the authors claim that 8.3% mortality in African children compared to 0.02% in Western countries is thus flawed by a misunderstanding of the denominators involved. It should include all infection in the paediatric catchment of the five hospitals, not those admitted for Covid-19. This appears to undermine their main argument for child-vaccination.
Regarding the translation of the study’s results into policymaking, Sam-Agudu et al. do not take account of vaccination costs and indirect effects, except for the fact that they argue that vaccination will reduce school closures. This is false dilemma. School closures result from a policy decision aimed at reducing community transmission. Irrespective of their impact on health outcomes, use of vaccination that allow continued transmission will not change this dynamic.
At no point in the article do the authors mention adverse events associated with Covid-19 vaccination. Myocarditis rates alone in teenage boys are widely shown to greatly outnumber expected Covid-19 admissions (8–10), and the capacity of African health systems for dealing with these will be limited. Similarly, the article makes no reference to the existence of post-infection immunity. Evidence from several countries indicates high levels of post-infection immunity (11,12), which is demonstrated to reduce additional vaccine benefit against Covid-19 to close to zero (13). Finally, the recent arrival of Omicron is reducing disease severity and accelerating acquisition of immunity, thereby further reducing the burden of Covid-19 on health systems and populations (14).
These latter factors mean that a mass population-wide vaccination campaign, as advocated by the authors, will very likely provide minimal benefit against Covid-19 whilst coming at considerable risk. Even if vaccinating African children and adolescents was cost-effective – which it doesn’t appear to be – this would not necessarily mean it is affordable, or good value-for-money when weighed against other priorities (15). The Africa CDC estimated the direct costs of Covid-19 vaccines necessary to vaccinate the continent amounted to $10 billion (16). This consists in a diversion of resources and local capacity away from the growing burden of malaria, tuberculosis and malnutrition in these countries (17,18), to a vaccination the efficacy of which is demonstrated to wane within several months (19).
We suggest that public health interventions must be based on a comprehensive cost/risk-benefit analysis with a strong evidence-base, not restricted to one narrow aspect of a proposed intervention. Further, that equity be considered as prioritising local health needs, not simply transferring interventions considered desirable in populations elsewhere. Without this, the above analysis indicates a mass population-wide vaccination of children in sub-Saharan Africa can be expected to produce net harm.
Sincerely.
References
1. Sam-Agudu NA, Quakyi NK, Masekela R, Zumla A, Nachega JB. Children and adolescents in African countries should also be vaccinated for COVID-19. BMJ Glob Health. 2022 Feb 1;7(2):e008315.
2. Govender K, Nyamaruze P, McKerrow N, Meyer-Weitz A, Cowden RG. COVID-19 vaccines for children and adolescents in Africa: aligning our priorities to situational realities. BMJ Glob Health. 2022 Feb 1;7(2):e007839.
3. Franco-Paredes C. Transmissibility of SARS-CoV-2 among fully vaccinated individuals. Lancet Infect Dis. 2022 Jan 1;22(1):16.
4. Eyre DW, Taylor D, Purver M, Chapman D, Fowler T, Pouwels KB, et al. Effect of Covid-19 Vaccination on Transmission of Alpha and Delta Variants. N Engl J Med [Internet]. 2022 Jan 5 [cited 2022 Feb 15]; Available from: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2116597
5. Nachega JB, Sam-Agudu NA, Machekano RN, Rabie H, van der Zalm MM, Redfern A, et al. Assessment of Clinical Outcomes Among Children and Adolescents Hospitalized With COVID-19 in 6 Sub-Saharan African Countries. JAMA Pediatr [Internet]. 2022 Jan 19 [cited 2022 Feb 14]; Available from: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2021.6436
6. Bell D, Schultz Hansen K. Relative Burdens of the COVID-19, Malaria, Tuberculosis, and HIV/AIDS Epidemics in Sub-Saharan Africa. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2021 Dec 1;105(6):1510–5.
7. Funk AL, Florin TA, Kuppermann N, Tancredi DJ, Xie J, Kim K, et al. Outcomes of SARS-CoV-2–Positive Youths Tested in Emergency Departments: The Global PERN–COVID-19 Study. JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Jan 11;5(1):e2142322–e2142322.
8. Lai FTT, Li X, Peng K, Huang L, Ip P, Tong X, et al. Carditis After COVID-19 Vaccination With a Messenger RNA Vaccine and an Inactivated Virus Vaccine. Ann Intern Med [Internet]. 2022 Jan 25 [cited 2022 Feb 15]; Available from: https://doi.org/10.7326/M21-3700
9. Patone M, Mei XW, Handunnetthi L, Dixon S, Zaccardi F, Shankar-Hari M, et al. Risks of myocarditis, pericarditis, and cardiac arrhythmias associated with COVID-19 vaccination or SARS-CoV-2 infection. Nat Med [Internet]. 2021 Dec 14; Available from: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-021-01630-0
10. Chua GT, Kwan MYW, Chui CSL, Smith RD, Cheung EC-L, Ma T, et al. Epidemiology of Acute Myocarditis/Pericarditis in Hong Kong Adolescents Following Comirnaty Vaccination. Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Nov 28;ciab989.
11. Müller SA, Wood RR, Hanefeld J, El-Bcheraoui C. Seroprevalence and risk factors of COVID-19 in healthcare workers from 11 African countries: a scoping review and appraisal of existing evidence. Health Policy Plan. 2021 Nov 2;czab133.
12. Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME). COVID-19 Results Briefing - The African Region [Internet]. 2022 Feb. Available from: https://www.healthdata.org/sites/default/files/files/Projects/COVID/2022...
13. León T, Dorabawila V, Nelson L, et al. COVID-19 Cases and Hospitalizations by COVID-19 Vaccination Status and Previous COVID-19 Diagnosis — California and New York, May–November 2021 [Internet]. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2022 Jan. Report No.: 71: 125-131. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/71/wr/mm7104e1.htm?s_cid=mm7104e1_w
14. Maslo C, Friedland R, Toubkin M, Laubscher A, Akaloo T, Kama B. Characteristics and Outcomes of Hospitalized Patients in South Africa During the COVID-19 Omicron Wave Compared With Previous Waves. JAMA. 2022 Feb 8;327(6):583–4.
15. Charlton V, Littlejohns P, Kieslich K, Mitchell P, Rumbold B, Weale A, et al. Cost effective but unaffordable: an emerging challenge for health systems. BMJ. 2017 Mar 22;356:j1402.
16. Meldrum A. African Union buys 270 million vaccine doses for continent. AP News [Internet]. 2021 Jan 13; Available from: https://apnews.com/article/pandemics-africa-cyril-ramaphosa-south-africa...
17. UNICEF. COVID-19 and children [Internet]. Available from: https://data.unicef.org/covid-19-and-children/
18. World Health Organization. World malaria report 2021 [Internet]. World Health Organization; 2021. Available from: https://reliefweb.int/sites/reliefweb.int/files/resources/978924004049-e...
19. Nordström P, Ballin M, Nordström A. Risk of infection, hospitalisation, and death up to 9 months after a second dose of COVID-19 vaccine: a retrospective, total population cohort study in Sweden. The Lancet [Internet]. 2022 Feb 4; Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140673622000897
We read with interest the article on ‘Disruptions in maternal health service use during Covid 19 pandemic by Zeus Aranda, Thierry Binde et.al that has appeared in the B.M. J. Global Health Vol7. Issue 1,2021(http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2021-007247) and wish to respond to it.
India has been battling the Covid 19 pandemic like most other countries of the world. The first two waves, particularly the second wave produced devastating effects on many aspects of human health and welfare .Disease mortality and morbidity was unparalleled. In addition to these direct effects of Covid 19 disease itself, one had to face a number of indirect effects of Covid 19 on women, adolescent girls and children. Lockdowns, loss of jobs, decrease in salaries, migration, supply chain disruption, inadequacy and inaccessibility of foods, green vegetables, stoppage of midday meals due to school closures, inadequate distribution of iron folic acid tablets from anganwadis to children, adolescents and antenatal women will probably impact women and children’s nutrition.
In the article by Zeus Aranda 1, they have predicted enormous disruptions in maternal health services1. We have observed the same in Maharashtra, a state in India.’
India has now...
We read with interest the article on ‘Disruptions in maternal health service use during Covid 19 pandemic by Zeus Aranda, Thierry Binde et.al that has appeared in the B.M. J. Global Health Vol7. Issue 1,2021(http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2021-007247) and wish to respond to it.
India has been battling the Covid 19 pandemic like most other countries of the world. The first two waves, particularly the second wave produced devastating effects on many aspects of human health and welfare .Disease mortality and morbidity was unparalleled. In addition to these direct effects of Covid 19 disease itself, one had to face a number of indirect effects of Covid 19 on women, adolescent girls and children. Lockdowns, loss of jobs, decrease in salaries, migration, supply chain disruption, inadequacy and inaccessibility of foods, green vegetables, stoppage of midday meals due to school closures, inadequate distribution of iron folic acid tablets from anganwadis to children, adolescents and antenatal women will probably impact women and children’s nutrition.
In the article by Zeus Aranda 1, they have predicted enormous disruptions in maternal health services1. We have observed the same in Maharashtra, a state in India.’
India has now begun to see the ill effects of pandemic on nutrition as collateral damage.We report two important observations on occurrence of Neural tube defects and severe acute malnutrition in children during the years from 1st January to 31st December of 2020 and 2021. The study has been done in Maharashtra, India, where a team of doctors under the national health program of RBSK(Rashtriya Bal Swasthya Karyakram), examined children below 18 years for '4Ds' i.e. Defects at birth, Diseases in children, Deficiency conditions and Developmental delays including disabilities. The same districts and anganwadis were screened in 2020 and 2021. The year 2020 was a reflection of health and nutrition status of adolescent girls, who were married in the pre-Covid years and delivered babies in the year 2020 and children in precovid time. The year 2021 reflected the health and nutrition status of women in the Covid year of 2020 who had to bear the brunt of the pandemic. It also reflected the status of nutrition in children in 2020 i.e. precovid times and 2021 reflecting nutritional insult in 2020.
A total number of 2121564 children were examined in 2020. Out of them 112(0.005%) were detected to have neural tube defects ( NTDs-meningocoele, meningomyelocoele, spina bifida), though anencephaly with resultant still births do not get reported in this data. In 2021, a total of 516655 babies were examined and 101(0.02%) had neural tube defects which are four times that of 2020 as per records from RBSK .The difference is statistically highly significant.(p<0.001). The number of babies born with NTDs were probably affected by Covid induced collateral nutrition insult i.e. folic acid deficiency in women during periconceptional period. Severe acute malnutrition was detected by measuring weight for height below -3SD on WHO growth charts. 7482 children had SAM (0.353%) in 2020 and 7148 (1.38%) children had SAM in 2021.The difference is statistically highly significant (p<0.001).
Occurrence of SAM is a measure of nutritional status of children of the community. It also is indicative of acuteness of nutritional insult. Unimaginably, it stands to reason that inadequate nutrition in 2020 manifested in more children developing SAM and the number is four times more than previous year.
High incidence of NTDs is even more alarming. Covid 19 resulted in women consuming less folate rich green vegetables, and they could probably not receive iron folic acid tablets during lockdowns. This resulted in birth of more children with neural tube defects.
NTDs are a surrogate marker of micronutrient deficiency in mothers during periconceptional period ; highlighting the importance of adolescent pre pregnancy and antenatal health. This is probably the first report of micronutrient impact of Covid 19 in periconceptional women.
Both these results depict nutritional impact of Covid 19 on women and children from Maharashtra, India.
We declare no conflict of interest.
1. Sr. Adv, and former Vice Chancellor, MUHS, Mumbai, India
2. Nutrition Specialist, UNICEF, Mumbai, India,
3. Assoc. Prof, Ped and Med Edu, DYP. Med college, Pune,India
4. Sr. Consultant, Pub.health, RJNM,Mumbai, India
5. Addl Chief Sec. Govt of Mah,Mumbai, India.
References
1.Zeus Aranda, Thierry Binda, Katherine Tashman,Ananya Tadikon Daniel Maweu,Emma Jean Boley6,Isaac Mphande, Isata Dumbuya, Mariana Montaño, Mary Clisbee, Mc Geofrey Mvula,
Melino Ndayizigiye Meredith Casella Jean-Baptiste, Prince F Varney,Sarah Anyango Karen Ann GrépiJean Bethany Hedt-Gauthier, Isabel R Fulcher on behalf of the Cross-site COVID-19 Syndromic Surveillance Working Group. Disruptions in maternal health service use during the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020: experiences from 37 health facilities in low-income and middle-income countries BMJ Global Health 2021 Vol7 issue1http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2021-007247)
Dear authors,
Since I have worked in remotest of PHCs in Himachal Pradesh, India and now am supervising them, the most unfavorable atmosphere for embedded research at grass roots is non availability of ethical committees and due to that either doctor fail to do research in field conditions or their research is hijacked by the medical colleges as PIs . Most of the medical colleges don't allow outside field doctors to get ethical clearance and have condition that medical college faculty would be PI for any research proposal/project, only then anyone can get research proposal listed in IEC.
I am trying to have an ethical committee notified at the level of Directorate of health so that PHC doctors can also get ethical clearance for their research this paper is talking about.
Thanks for raising this issue at global level.
Regards,
Dr. Omesh Kumar Bharti, Field Epidemiologist bhartiomesh@yahoo.com
Hi,
Its more of a doubt. I would like to know what risk of bias tool was used by the team? What were the findings on risk of bias, since I couldn't find anywhere in the article reporting the same.
Dear Editor,
It is with great interest that I read Doherty et al.’s commentary in which the authors express concern about the ethical appropriateness of a randomised controlled trial that had received ethical approval. Doherty et al.’s study serves as a valuable reminder that a study is not ethical simply because it has received ethical approval, as previous studies have also emphasised.1 One might also add that just because a study has reported having obtained ethical approval, it cannot be assumed that the study has adhered to the recommendations of the research ethics committee or informed the committee of its plans in full. Doshi (2020) reported on bioethicist Charles Wiejer’s concern that a randomised controlled trial of malaria vaccine Mosquirix had waived the requirement of informed consent.2 Weijer was quoted as saying “It is difficult to see how a research ethics committee could have approved a waiver of consent for the WHO malaria vaccine pilot cluster randomized trial.”2 These studies raise the question of whether academic journals should play a greater role in scrutinising the ethical appropriateness of studies submitted for publication?
As a doctoral student with a keen interest in public health ethics, I previously attended weekly editorial board meetings of a major scientific journal with the sole purpose of interrogating the submitted studies for ethical issues. In these meetings, I raised serious questions about some of the studies that had r...
Show MoreHow to use heat stable carbetocin and tranexamic acid for postpartum haemorrhage in practice
A. Metin Gülmezoglu1, Sara Rushwan1
Show More1 Concept Foundation, Geneva, Switzerland
We welcome the paper by Tran et al [1]. There are increasing number of options for postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) prevention and management as recommended by WHO and the context is important. We agree that at the national level the first step is to update the national policies including the guidelines and essential medicine lists (EMLs). Since 2019, Concept Foundation and its partners have been working in 14 East and West African sub-Saharan countries to facilitate those updates [2]. We are pleased to report that in 10 out of the 14 countries – Burkina Faso, DRC, Ethiopia, Ghana, Ivory Coast, Liberia, Rwanda, Sierra Leone, South Sudan, and Uganda – the national guideline and/or EML were updated during this period.
The strength of the project lies in the engagement with policy makers, Ministry of Health officials, clinicians, professional associations, and civil society organizations concurrently. However, competing national policy priorities such as COVID-19, timing of the previous updates, political instability and national capacity and leadership (or lack of) can make the updating process long and challenging even when there is an agreement to update. Secondly, even when the updates happen, proactive dissemination and training within the country can also take time. Thirdly, in the...
It is a humble request if you could kindly specify the names of villages and areas that you surveyed, as it would be of immense help and guidance.
Thank you
Dear Editor,
I am extremely puzzled by the lack of any response regarding my proposed comments regarding this article. I've submitted my comments twice, but they have not been published. I cannot imagine why. It appears to be a discretionary censorship, which is of course contrary to BMJ's published editorial policies which generally favor respectful discourse. I would greatly appreciate an explanation and an appeal to a larger panel of BMJ editors.
To repeat...for the third time,... regarding this article:
There is a growing interest in developing evidenced based standards for public health policy initiatives.[1] In response to this effort, Burris et al have put forward their own initial effort to identify the potential effects of laws regulating abortion on women’s health.[2] Unfortunately, they apparently failed to include in their research team anyone with familiarity with the literature regarding the negative physical and psychological effects of coerced and unnecessary abortions. This is not a minor oversight.
Regarding the issue of women’s autonomy, increasing legal access to abortion is a double-edged sword. Easier access makes it easier for women to choose abortion for their own self-interests, but it also makes it easier for those pressuring women into unwanted abortions to abuse women’s rights.[3]
Coerced abortions are especially common among women enslaved in sex trafficking.[4,5] But it is also common within...
Show MoreDear sir,
We herewith report effects of disruptions on maternal and child health services in Maharashtra, India.
Covid 19- collateral damage on nutrition of women and children, in Maharashtra, India
Phadke M1,Nair R2,Menon P3,Jotkar R4, Saunik S5
India has been battling the Covid 19 pandemic like most other countries of the world. The first two waves, particularly the second wave produced devastating effects on many aspects of human health and welfare .Disease mortality and morbidity was unparalleled. In addition to these direct effects of Covid 19 disease itself, a number of indirect effects of Covid 19 on women, adolescent girls and children occurred. Lockdowns, loss of jobs, decrease in salaries, migration, supply chain disruption, inadequacy and inaccessibility of foods, green vegetables, stoppage of midday meals due to school closures, inadequate distribution of iron folic acid tablets from anganwadis impacted women and children’s nutrition.
Show MoreDisruptions in maternal health services have been reported 1. We report two observations on occurrence of Neural tube defects and severe acute malnutrition in children during the years from 1st January to 31st December of 2020 and 2021. A team of doctors under the national health program of RBSK(Rashtriya Bal Swasthya Karyakram), examined children for '4Ds' i.e. Defects at birth, Diseases in children, Deficiency conditions and Developmental delays including disabilities. The year...
To the editor,
With interest we read the recent paper by Caviglia et al, describing the relation between prehospital ambulance time and outcome in terms of maternal and perinatal outcomes in the setting of Sierra Leone1. Sierra Leone has one of the highest rates of maternal (1360 in 100.000 life births) and infant (87 in 1.000 births) mortality worldwide2. The National Emergency Medical Service (NEMS) was designed and started in this country, an effort by or in collaboration with part of the authors of the current manuscript3. The results show that longer prehospital ambulance times are associated with poor outcome. Furthermore, only in the capital and its surroundings the 2-hour target is met in a high percentage of patients, with only 24-65% of patients meeting this mark in the more rural areas of the country. The authors conclude that there are still major geographical barriers for timely access to care, and that any intervention to strengthen the existing primary health system may help reduce maternal and perinatal mortality.
The elaborate NEMS system, including 81 fully equipped and staffed ambulances with a centralized operations centre, was operational since 2018, with the last districts connected to the service in 2019. The system was managed by the local ministry of health and sanitation (MoHS) and funded through the governmental budget, with help from the World Bank, Doctors with Africa (CUAMM, Padua, Italy), the Regional Government of Veneto (Ita...
Show MoreDear Editor,
We agree with Sam-Agudu et al. on the importance of equity in public health (1), and for these reasons raise major concerns regarding the remainder of the Commentary’s focus, and similar view prevalent in this Journal (2) and the wider global health community. We respectfully outline these here, as they affect the current health focus being applied to over a billion people in sub-Saharan countries.
Sam-Agudu and co-authors state that ‘Global, equitable access to safe and effective vaccines for all age groups is critical to ending the COVID-19 pandemic’. This statement, reflecting those of the COVAX programme of the World Health Organization (WHO) and other agencies, is flawed. Equity in health means opportunity for good health, based on individual need, not measured by access to a particular pharmaceutical. A vaccine that does not significantly reduce transmission (3,4) will not end a pandemic, and where risk of severity is low from intrinsic or acquired immune status, will not significantly change outcomes. This flawed assertion also ignores costs of vaccination, both in potential adverse effects, and in resource diversion from other health programmes (public health programmes do not operate in isolation).
Show MoreRegarding the evidence base used to support their argumentation, and related expected benefits of vaccination, much of Sam-Agudu et al.’s arguments are based on the African Forum for Research and Education in Health (AFREhealth) study r...
Covid 19- women’s health, occurrence of neural tube defects and severe acute malnutrition in children
Phadke M1,Nair R2,Menon P3,Jotkar R4, Saunik S5
Dear sir,
We read with interest the article on ‘Disruptions in maternal health service use during Covid 19 pandemic by Zeus Aranda, Thierry Binde et.al that has appeared in the B.M. J. Global Health Vol7. Issue 1,2021(http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2021-007247) and wish to respond to it.
Show MoreIndia has been battling the Covid 19 pandemic like most other countries of the world. The first two waves, particularly the second wave produced devastating effects on many aspects of human health and welfare .Disease mortality and morbidity was unparalleled. In addition to these direct effects of Covid 19 disease itself, one had to face a number of indirect effects of Covid 19 on women, adolescent girls and children. Lockdowns, loss of jobs, decrease in salaries, migration, supply chain disruption, inadequacy and inaccessibility of foods, green vegetables, stoppage of midday meals due to school closures, inadequate distribution of iron folic acid tablets from anganwadis to children, adolescents and antenatal women will probably impact women and children’s nutrition.
In the article by Zeus Aranda 1, they have predicted enormous disruptions in maternal health services1. We have observed the same in Maharashtra, a state in India.’
India has now...
Dear authors,
Since I have worked in remotest of PHCs in Himachal Pradesh, India and now am supervising them, the most unfavorable atmosphere for embedded research at grass roots is non availability of ethical committees and due to that either doctor fail to do research in field conditions or their research is hijacked by the medical colleges as PIs . Most of the medical colleges don't allow outside field doctors to get ethical clearance and have condition that medical college faculty would be PI for any research proposal/project, only then anyone can get research proposal listed in IEC.
I am trying to have an ethical committee notified at the level of Directorate of health so that PHC doctors can also get ethical clearance for their research this paper is talking about.
Thanks for raising this issue at global level.
Regards,
Dr. Omesh Kumar Bharti, Field Epidemiologist
bhartiomesh@yahoo.com
Hi,
Its more of a doubt. I would like to know what risk of bias tool was used by the team? What were the findings on risk of bias, since I couldn't find anywhere in the article reporting the same.
Pages