Skip to main content
Log in

The global tobacco control ‘endgame’: Change the policy environment to implement the FCTC

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Public Health Policy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The World Health Organization (WHO) Framework Convention for Tobacco Control (FCTC) has prompted major change in tobacco control globally. However, policy implementation has been uneven, making ‘smoke free’ outcomes possible in some countries, but not others. We identify the factors that would improve implementation. We describe an ideal type of ‘comprehensive tobacco control regimes’, where policy environments are conducive to the implementation of tobacco control measures designed to eradicate tobacco use. The ideal type requires that a country have certain policy processes: the department of health takes the policy lead; tobacco is ‘framed’ as a public health problem; public health groups are consulted at the expense of tobacco interests; socioeconomic conditions are conducive to policy change; and, the scientific evidence is ‘set in stone’ within governments. No country will meet all these criteria in the short term, and the gap between the ideal type and the current state is wide in many countries. However, the WHO experience provides a model for progress.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Malone, R.E. (2013) Tobacco endgames: What they are and are not, issues for tobacco control strategic planning and a possible US scenario. Tobacco Control 22 (Suppl 1): i42–i44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, G., Edwards, R., Wilson, N. and Blakely, T. (2012) What are the elements of the tobacco endgame? Tobacco Control 21 (2): 293–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myers, M.L. (2013) The FCTC’s evidence-based policies remain a key to ending the tobacco epidemic. Tobacco Control 22 (Suppl 1): i45–i46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cairney, P. (2012) Understanding Public Policy: Theories and Issues. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cairney, P., Studlar, D. and Mamudu, H.M. (2012) Global Tobacco Control: Power, Policy, Governance and Transfer. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • WHO. (2012) 2012 Global progress report on implementation of the WHO framework convention on tobacco control. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO, http://www.who.int/fctc/reporting/2012_global_progress_report_en.pdf, accessed 3 April 2013.

  • WHO. (2010) 2010 Global progress report on the implementation of the WHO framework convention on tobacco control. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO, http://www.who.int/fctc/reporting/progress_report_final.pdf, accessed 15 March 2013.

  • WHO. (2009) 2009 Summary report of the global progress in the implementation of the WHO framework convention on tobacco control. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO, http://www.who.int/fctc/FCTC-2009-1-en.pdf, accessed 15 March 2013.

  • Sanders-Jackson, A.N., Song, A.V., Hiilamo, H. and Glantz, S.A. (2013) Effect of the framework convention on tobacco control and voluntary industry health warning labels on passage of mandated cigarette warning labels from 1965 to 2012: Transition probability and event history analyses. American Journal of Public Health 103 (11): 2041–2047.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warner, K.E. and Tam, J. (2012) The impact of tobacco control research on policy: 20 years of progress. Tobacco Control 21 (2): 103–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2013) Winnable battles. Atlanta, GA: CDC, http://www.cdc.gov/winnablebattles/, accessed 15 December 2013.

  • Pacheco, J. (2012) The social contagion model: Exploring the role of public opinion in the diffusion of anti-smoking legislation across the American states. The Journal of Politics 74 (1): 187–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mamudu, H.M., Gonzalez, M. and Glantz, S.A. (2011) The nature, scope, and development of the global tobacco control epistemic community. American Journal of Public Health 101 (11): 2044–2054.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warner, K.E. (2005) The role of research in international tobacco control. American Journal of Public Health 95 (6): 976–984.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Widome, R. et al (2010) Science, prudence, and politics: The case of smoke-free indoor spaces. Annals of Epidemiology 20 (6): 428–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mamudu, H.M., Hammond, R. and Glantz, S. (2008) Tobacco industry attempts to counter the World Bank report curbing the epidemic and obstruct the WHO framework convention on tobacco control. Social Science & Medicine 67 (11): 1690–1699.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Otanez, M., Mamudu, H. and Glantz, S. (2007) Global leaf companies control the tobacco market in Malawi. Tobacco Control 16 (4): 261–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WHO. (2011) WHO framework convention on tobacco control: Guidelines for implementation. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO, http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2011/9789241501316_eng.pdf, accessed 8 April 2013.

  • Mamudu, H.M. and Glantz, S. (2009) Civil society and the negotiation of the framework convention on tobacco control. Global Public Health 4 (2): 150–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shibuya, K., Ciedierski, C., Guindon, E., Bettcher, D.W., Evans, D.B. and Murray, C.J.L. (2003) WHO framework convention on tobacco control: Development of an evidence-based global public health treaty. British Medical Journal 327 (7407): 154–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tumwine, J. (2011) Implementation of the framework convention on tobacco control in Africa: Current status of legislation. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 8 (11): 4312–4331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patel, P., Collin, J. and Gilmore, A.B. (2007) The law was actually drafted by us but the government is to be congratulated on its wise actions: British American tobacco and public policy in Kenya. Tobacco Control 16 (1): e1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eriksen, M., Mackay, J. and Ross, H. (2012) The Tobacco Atlas. Atlanta, GA: American Cancer Society and World Lung Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCool, J., McKenzie, J., Lyman, A. and Allen, M. (2013) Supporting Pacific Island countries to strengthen their resistance to tobacco industry interference in tobacco control: A case study of Papua new Guinea and Solomon islands. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 10 (8): 3424–3434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Albuja, S. and Daynard, R.A. (2009) The framework convention on tobacco control (FCTC) and the adoption of domestic tobacco control policies: The Ecuadorian experience. Tobacco Control 1818–1821.

  • Tam, J. and van Walbeek, C. (2013) Tobacco control in Namibia: The importance of government capacity, media coverage and industry interference. Tobacco Control, doi:10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050725.

  • Jin, J. (2012) FCTC and China’s politics of tobacco control. New Haven, CT: Princeton University, http://www.princeton.edu/~pcglobal/conferences/GLF/jin.pdf, accessed 15 September 2013.

  • Lv, J. et al (2011) Implementation of the WHO framework convention on tobacco control in mainland China. Tobacco Control 20 (4): 309–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Redmon, P., Chen, L.C., Wood, J.L., Li, S. and Koplan, J.P. (2013) Challenges for philanthropy and tobacco control in China (1986–2012). Tobacco Control 22 (Suppl 2): ii4–ii8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, T. (ed.) (2008) Tobacco Control Policy Analysis in China: Economics and Health. London: Word Scientific.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cairney, P. (2009) Tobacco control policy analysis in China: Economics and health (review). China Quarterly 200: 1106–1107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Branigan, T. (2011) China Bans Smoking in Indoor Spaces – But Won’t Penalise Puffers. London: The Guardian, http://www.theguardian.com/world/2011/may/01/china-bans-smoking-without-penalty, accessed 7 December 2013.

  • Huang, C. et al (2013) Smoking behaviours and cessation services among male physicians in China: Evidence from a structural equation model. Tobacco Control 22 (Suppl 2): ii27–ii33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wan, X. et al (2013) Development of policy performance indicators to assess the implementation of protection from exposure to secondhand smoke in China. Tobacco Control 22 (Suppl 2): ii9–ii15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koplan, J.P., Eriksen, M., Chen, L. and Yang, G. (2013) The value of research as a component of successful tobacco control in China. Tobacco Control 22 (Suppl 2): ii1–ii3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WHO. (2009) Smoke-Free Movies: From Evidence to Action. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO.

  • Schwartz, R.L., Wipfli, H.L. and Samet, J.M. (2011) World no tobacco day 2011: India’s progress in implementing the framework convention on tobacco control. Indian Journal of Medical Research 133 (5): 455–457.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehl, G., Wipfli, H. and Winch, P. (2005) Controlling tobacco: The vital role of local communities. Harvard International Review 27 (1): 54–58.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul Cairney.

Additional information

Going beyond efforts to control and reduce tobacco use, the authors see smoke-free measures as eliminating the example of smoking for children.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cairney, P., Mamudu, H. The global tobacco control ‘endgame’: Change the policy environment to implement the FCTC. J Public Health Pol 35, 506–517 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1057/jphp.2014.18

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/jphp.2014.18

Keywords

Navigation