Elsevier

Preventive Medicine

Volume 93, December 2016, Pages 189-197
Preventive Medicine

Review Article
Global tobacco prevention and control in relation to a cardiovascular health promotion and disease prevention framework: A narrative review

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.10.004Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Cardiovascular endpoints are markers of tobacco control progress and success.

  • Intensified implementation of tobacco control is critical to global CVD prevention.

  • There are new and continuing challenges to tobacco control, especially in LMICs.

  • Cardiovascular health professionals play an important role in tobacco control.

Abstract

The purpose of this review is to emphasize the role of tobacco prevention and control in cardiovascular health (CVH) promotion and cardiovascular disease (CVD) prevention, including the importance of these endpoints for measuring the full impact of tobacco-related policies, programs, and practices. In this review, we describe an overview of tobacco control interventions that have led to substantial declines in tobacco use and the relationship between these declines with CVH and CVD. We review interventions that have had success in high-income countries (HICs) as well as those that are gaining traction in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). We emphasize the challenges to comprehensive tobacco prevention and control strategies faced by LMICs, and highlight the special role of cardiovascular health professionals in achieving CVH promotion and CVD prevention endpoints through tobacco control. Tobacco prevention and control strategies have a strong scientific basis, yet a distinct gap remains between this evidence and implementation of tobacco control policies, particularly in LMICs. Health professionals can contribute to tobacco control efforts, especially through patient-level clinical interventions, when supported by a health care system and government that recognize and support tobacco control as a critical strategy for CVH promotion and CVD prevention. Understanding, supporting, and applying current and evolving policies, programs, and practices in tobacco prevention and control is the province of all health professionals, especially those concerned with CVH promotion and CVD prevention. A new tobacco control roadmap from the World Heart Federation provides a strong impetus to the needed interdisciplinary collaboration.

Introduction

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death worldwide (WHO, 2012), and is especially prevalent in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) where over 80% of CVD deaths occur (Hoyert and Zu, 2012). Comprehensive tobacco control is a critical global public health strategy for cardiovascular health (CVH) promotion and CVD prevention. Four fundamental strategies are distinguished in a CVH/CVD framework: 1) preserving CVH/low CVD risk; 2) controlling increased CVD risk; 3) detecting and treating acute CVD events; and 4) reducing disability and risk of recurrent CVD events. Tobacco control within each of these domains requires a different approach, with tobacco prevention being a key component for maintaining ideal CVH and tobacco cessation being a key component for restoring ideal CVH, controlling increased CVD risk, and treating individuals who have survived CVD events (Fig. 1).

Here, we consider the role of comprehensive tobacco prevention and control within this CVH promotion and CVD prevention framework. We conducted an expert review using electronic databases (e.g., PubMed), manual searches of peer-reviewed journals most likely to publish global tobacco control research or commentaries (e.g., Tobacco Control, Global Heart), and reference lists of included articles, policy reports, and treatment practice guidelines. To better inform cardiovascular health professionals unfamiliar with tobacco prevention and control strategies, we review recent developments in this arena and the current state of global tobacco prevention and control. We include strategies that have led to the declines in tobacco use in high-income countries (HICs) and those that are gaining traction in LMICs, as well as topical challenges to global tobacco control in the context of CVH promotion and CVD prevention. We then describe the possible role of cardiovascular health professionals within the larger global tobacco control movement. We conclude with a focus on the tobacco endgame as a critical component of global CVH promotion and CVD prevention.

Section snippets

Viewing tobacco control from the perspective of CVH promotion and CVD prevention

A priority for global CVH promotion and CVD prevention should be to end the tobacco epidemic through comprehensive, integrated, and coordinated tobacco prevention and control strategies (Reddy et al., 2012). The World Bank (1999) estimated that cumulative tobacco-attributable deaths through year 2050 would number 520 million with then-current prevention and intervention efforts, but could be reduced to 500 million if initiation rates were reduced by 50%, or to 340 million if adult consumption

Developing and implementing the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC)

The Framework Convention for Tobacco Control (FCTC) represents a comprehensive approach to global tobacco control, and is the successful amalgamation of several international human rights proposals to address the global epidemic of tobacco use (WHO, 2003). With membership comprising 168 Signatories and 180 Parties,1

Successes in global tobacco control: “best buys”

To enact cost-effective interventions against noncommunicable diseases (NCDs) globally, the WHO Global Burden of Disease project proposed a list of “best buy” policies – strategies that require relatively low investment for their great projected impact and support both primordial and remedial tobacco control (WHO, 2011b, World Economic Forum and the Harvard School of Public Heal). This list of best buys was adopted by the WHO as priority interventions for FCTC signatories.

Barriers to tobacco control implementation in LMICs

Although tobacco control policies have led to significant and often swift reductions in population smoking rates, and corresponding declines in CVD, there are important barriers to implementation of tobacco control policies in LMICs. Tobacco control research and policy are strategically interdependent (Mackay, 2013), however, there is often a lag in the process of policy research, implementation, evaluation, and optimization (FCTC Article 20; Gupta et al., 2012, Warner and Tam, 2012). To

Ending the tobacco epidemic

Discussion of the “tobacco problem,” as termed by the Institute of Medicine, has now advanced to “ending the epidemic” (USDHHS, 2010). Since the first U.S. Surgeon General's Report in 1964, an estimated 8 million lives and 157 million life-years have been saved as a result of tobacco control efforts (Holford et al., 2014). Although the proportion of the population who are smoking has decreased significantly, with the growing global population the actual number of current daily smokers has

The Tobacco Endgame

Ending the Tobacco Epidemic (USDHHS, 2010) cited “a historical opportunity to rekindle the momentum of previous decades and achieve the vision of a society free from tobacco-related death and disease.” Four strategic actions were proposed: 1) strengthening implementation of evidence-based interventions and policies in states and communities; 2) changing social norms around tobacco use; 3) leveraging health and human service systems and resources to create a society free of tobacco-related

Conclusion

The 20th anniversary issue of Tobacco Control included a critical appraisal of the relation between the tobacco control movement and prevention of NCDs (among which CVD predominates) (Wipfli and Samet, 2012). Integration and synergy of these efforts would be supported by a global commitment to the United Nations Sustainable Development Goal 3.4 to reduce mortality due to NCDs (and CVD in particular) by one third by the year 2030 (http://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/health/) and the WHO

Conflict of interest statement

We do not have any financial interest/arrangement or affiliation with one or more organizations that could be perceived as a real or apparent conflict of interest in the context of the subject of this presentation. DRL and MDH receive grant support from the World Heart Federation to serve as a consultant and the senior program advisor, respectively, for the World Heart Federation's Emerging Leaders program, which is supported by Boehringer Ingelheim and Bupa. BH has served on a scientific

Funding

Allison Carroll was supported by a Predoctoral Individual National Research Service Award (F31 HL129494).

References (145)

  • S. Kalkhoran et al.

    E-cigarettes and smoking cessation in real-world and clinical settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis

    Lancet Respir. Med.

    (2016)
  • V. Kontis et al.

    Contribution of six risk factors to achieving the 25 × 25 non-communicable disease mortality reduction target: a modelling study

    Lancet

    (2014)
  • G. Kumar et al.

    Global tobacco surveys: information for action by cardiologists

    Glob. Health

    (2012)
  • G. Kumar et al.

    Noncigarette smoking patterns, their health deffects and policy options

    Glob. Health

    (2012)
  • W. Maziak

    The waterpipe: a new global threat to CV health?

    Glob. Health

    (2012)
  • D.G. Meyers et al.

    Cardiovascular effect of bans on smoking in public places: a systematic review and meta-analysis

    J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.

    (2009)
  • A. Pipe et al.

    Physician smoking status, attitudes toward smoking, and cessation advice to patients: an international survey

    Patient Educ. Couns.

    (2009)
  • M. Rahman et al.

    Bidi smoking and health

    Public Health

    (2000)
  • M. Raw et al.

    Time to take tobacco dependence treatment seriously

    Lancet

    (2016)
  • B. Samb et al.

    Prevention and management of chronic disease: a litmus test for health-systems strengthening in low-income and middle-income countries

    Lancet

    (2010)
  • D. Agarwal et al.

    Examining e-cigarette use among college students

    Tob. Regul. Sci.

    (2015)
  • K. Bjartveit et al.

    Health consequences of smoking 1–4 cigarettes per day

    Tob. Control.

    (2005)
  • N.T. Brewer et al.

    Effect of pictorial cigarette pack warnings on changes in smoking behavior: a randomized clinical trial

    JAMA Intern. Med.

    (2016)
  • J.B. Bump et al.

    Political economy analysis for tobacco control in low- and middle-income countries

    Health Policy Plan.

    (2013)
  • K. Cahill et al.

    Pharmacological interventions for smoking cessation: an overview and network meta-analysis

    Cochrane Database Syst. Rev.

    (2013)
  • P. Cairney et al.

    The global tobacco control ‘endgame’: change the policy environment to implement the FCTC

    J. Public Health Policy

    (2014)
  • CDC

    Smoking-cessation advice from health-care providers - Canada, 2005

    MMWR

    (2007)
  • CDC

    Tobacco product use among middle and high school students - United States, 2011–2012

    MMWR

    (2013)
  • CDC

    Tobacco use among middle and high school students — United States, 2011–2014

    MMWR

    (2015)
  • A. Charlesworth et al.

    Smoking in the movies increases adolescent smoking: a review

    Pediatrics

    (2005)
  • P.C. Chen et al.

    A cost-benefit analysis of the outpatient smoking cessation services in Taiwan from a societal viewpoint

    Nicotine Tob. Res.

    (2012)
  • C. Chen et al.

    E-cigarette design preference and smoking cessation: A U.S. population study

    Am. J. Prev. Med.

    (2016)
  • N.K. Cobb et al.

    Social network structure of a large online community for smoking cessation

    Am. J. Public Health

    (2010)
  • J.E. Cohen et al.

    Tobacco commerce on the internet: a threat to comprehensive tobacco control

    Tob. Control.

    (2001)
  • E.P. Davila et al.

    Correlates of smoking quit attempts: Florida Tobacco Callback Survey, 2007

    Tob. Induc. Dis.

    (2009)
  • S. Durkin et al.

    Mass media campaigns to promote smoking cessation among adults: an integrative review

    Tob. Control.

    (2012)
  • T. Elton-Marshall et al.

    Beliefs about the relative harm of “light” and “low tar” cigarettes: findings from the International Tobacco Control (ITC) China Survey

    Tob. Control.

    (2010)
  • M.P. Eriksen et al.

    The Tobacco Atlas

    (2012)
  • A.L. Fairchild et al.

    The renormalization of smoking? E-cigarettes and the tobacco “endgame”

    N. Engl. J. Med.

    (2014)
  • M.C. Farrelly et al.

    A comprehensive examination of the influence of state tobacco control programs and policies on youth smoking

    Am. J. Public Health

    (2013)
  • C.M. Fichtenberg et al.

    Effect of smoke-free workplaces on smoking behaviour: systematic review

    BMJ

    (2002)
  • B. Freeman et al.

    Is “YouTube” telling or selling you something? Tobacco content on the YouTube video-sharing website

    Tob. Control.

    (2007)
  • B. Freeman et al.

    British American Tobacco on Facebook: undermining article 13 of the global World Health Organization framework convention on tobacco control

    Tob. Control.

    (2010)
  • A.B. Gilmore

    Understanding the vector in order to plan effective tobacco control policies: an analysis of contemporary tobacco industry materials

    Tob. Control.

    (2012)
  • P. Hajek et al.

    Efficacy of cytisine in helping smokers quit: systematic review and meta-analysis

    Thorax

    (2013)
  • D. Hammond

    Tobacco Labelling and Packaging Toolkit: A Guide to FCTC Article 11

    (2009)
  • D. Hammond et al.

    The impact of cigarette package design on perceptions of risk

    J. Public Health (Oxf.)

    (2009)
  • M. Hefler et al.

    Tobacco control advocacy in the age of social media: using Facebook, Twitter and Change

    Tob. Control.

    (2012)
  • L. Henriksen

    Comprehensive tobacco marketing restrictions: promotion, packaging, price and place

    Tob. Control.

    (2012)
  • T.R. Holford et al.

    Tobacco control and the reduction in smoking-related premature deaths in the United States, 1964–2012

    JAMA

    (2014)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text