Mathematical modelling of hepatitis C treatment for injecting drug users
Introduction
Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is a blood-borne disease with an estimated global prevalence of 2–3%, or 130–170 million people, and is one of the leading causes of chronic liver disease (Shepard et al., 2005). If left untreated, about 7–18% of those infected will progress to liver disease within 20 years, which can result in progressive liver failure, cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma and death (Seeff, 2009).
In developed countries, the primary mode of transmission is amongst injecting drug users (IDUs) through needle and syringe sharing, with over 80% of new cases in the UK attributed to injecting drugs (ACMD, 2009). HCV is easily transmitted amongst IDUs, with 15–90% of IDUs testing positive for HCV antibodies (Page-Shafer et al., 2008, Judd et al., 2005, Hahn et al., 2002). Current preventative measures to reduce HCV transmission such as health education and advice, needle and syringe exchange, and opiate substitution therapy aim to prevent transmission by reducing unsafe injecting (ACMD, 2009). However, public health surveillance indicates substantial decreases in prevalence have not been achieved (Palmateer et al., 2010).
HCV antiviral treatment (peginterferon- and ribavirin) is effective, resulting in viral clearance in 45–80% of cases, depending on HCV genotype (NICE, 2000). Prior to 2002, guidelines in the US and UK recommended against treating active IDUs. However, current guidelines now do not exclude IDUs from treatment eligibility, given mounting evidence that IDUs exhibit a similar response to treatment, and are just as compliant with treatment as ex- or non-IDUs (Hellard et al., 2009, NICE, 2006, Shepherd et al., 2007, NIH, 2002). Nevertheless, despite these recommendations and the high numbers of IDUs infected, very few () active IDUs have ever been treated (Grebely et al., 2006, Seal et al., 2005). Studies on treatment barriers have indicated a reluctance to treat active IDUs due to the possibility of subsequent reinfection (Booth et al., 2001, Reimer et al., 2005, Foster, 2008).
We examine the potential of antiviral treatment as a prevention strategy for HCV amongst IDUs. By using antiviral treatment to reduce prevalence amongst active IDUs, the treatment can act to reduce the risk of infection for other IDUs. But to what extent? This paper examines the potential impact of HCV treatment on prevalence and transmission, including the possibility of reinfection. We incorporate two treatment scenarios (treating a proportion of infected IDUs, and a fixed number of IDUs) and examine the resulting dynamics and treatment needed for eradication. Treating a constant proportion of the population is the function most commonly used in infectious disease modelling. However, annually treating a fixed number of IDUs would be more likely in the initial stages of a treatment delivery programme, or in situations with budget constraints. Hence, we analyse both situations.
Section snippets
Background and assumptions for the model
Infection with HCV leads to a brief acute stage, which is relatively short (on the order of weeks to months) in comparison to the prolonged chronic stage (on the order of decades) (ECMDDA, 2004). In the first few weeks, viral levels may be undetectable, increasing but possibly remaining low during the remainder of the acute stage. A fraction of people (about 26%) spontaneously clear the acute infection (Micallef et al., 2006). The specifics of spontaneous clearance are not well known, although
Details and explanation of the model
We use a system of ordinary differential equations to describe the transmission of HCV amongst active IDUs. We utilise a four compartment model, tracking susceptible, chronically infected, treated, and immune IDUs. Susceptible IDUs become infected through sharing of needles with an infected IDU. About one quarter spontaneously clear the infection, and become susceptible or immune. The remaining three-quarters progress to chronic infection. Chronic infecteds can be treated, with a certain chance
Proportional treatment
At steady state, . Setting the left-hand side of Eqs. (7), (10) to zero (with defined by (12) and solving for the equilibrium values we find two steady states. One is the trivial disease-free steady state,The second equilibrium is the infected endemic steady state, defined by FP2=(x2⁎, c2⁎, t2⁎, z2⁎), where
Numerical methods
Numerical simulations of Eqs. (7), (11) were performed using the MATLAB ODE solver, ode45. Because HCV is not in the breakout epidemic phase in the majority of real-world settings, the simulations were run until steady state ( years), and then treatment initiated. The parameter values are given in Table 2. For specific predictions at untreated equilibrium infected prevalences of 20%, 40%, and 60%, the values of used were , , and , respectively.
The calculation of the
Discussion and conclusions
In this paper we analyse a mathematical model of HCV transmission amongst active IDUs, examining the potential for antiviral treatment to reduce HCV transmission. Despite guidelines stating that current IDUs should not be excluded from obtaining treatment, very few are treated, with the risk of reinfection used as justification for withholding treatment. However, our model indicates that antiviral treatment could act as a prevention measure for the wider IDU community by reducing prevalence
Acknowledgements
Grant support: This manuscript was supported by the Scottish Government Hepatitis C Action Plan, NCCRCD/NIHR CRDHB, and the MRC New Investigator Award.
References (32)
- et al.
Universal voluntary HIV testing with immediate antiretroviral therapy as a strategy for elimination of HIV transmission: a mathematical model
The Lancet
(2009) - et al.
Uptake of hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment among injection drug users (IDUS) in Vancouver, Canada
Journal of Hepatology
(2006) - et al.
Treatment uptake and outcomes among current and former injection drug users receiving directly observed therapy within a multidisciplinary group model for the treatment of hepatitis C virus infection
International Journal of Drug Policy
(2007) - et al.
Successful treatment of chronic hepatitis C with pegylated interferon in combination with ribavirin in a methadone maintenance treatment program
Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment
(2009) - et al.
Protection against persistence of hepatitis C
The Lancet
(2002) - et al.
Incidence of heroin use in Zurich, Switzerland: a treatment case register analysis
The Lancet
(2006) - et al.
Global epidemiology of hepatitis C virus infection
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
(2005) - ACMD. 2009. The primary prevention of Hepatitis C among injecting drug users. Technical...
- et al.
A tale of two futures: HIV and antiretroviral therapy in San Francisco
Science
(2000) - et al.
Clinical guidelines on the management of Hepatitis C
Gut
(2001)
Injecting drug users with chronic hepatitis C: should they be offered antiviral therapy?
Addiction
Hepatitis C virus seroconversion among young injection drug users: relationships and risks
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
Hepatitis C treatment for injection drug users: a review of the available evidence
Clinical Infectious Diseases
Hepatitis C virus (HCV) prevalence and injecting risk behaviour in multiple sites in England in 2004
Journal of Viral Hepatitis
Assessing IDU prevalence and health consequences (HCV, overdose and drug-related mortality) in a primary care trust: implications for public health action
Journal of Public Health (Oxford)
Cited by (87)
Optimism and eternal vigilance: Gathering disease, responsible subjects and the hope of elimination in the new hepatitis C treatment era
2023, International Journal of Drug PolicyDynamical analysis of a generalized hepatitis B epidemic model and its dynamically consistent discrete model
2023, Mathematics and Computers in SimulationA fractional order differential equation model for Hepatitis B virus with saturated incidence
2021, Results in PhysicsThe hepatitis C care cascade among people who inject drugs accessing harm reduction services in Catalonia: Major gaps for migrants
2021, International Journal of Drug PolicyHow to think with models and targets: Hepatitis C elimination as a numbering performance
2021, International Journal of Drug PolicyCitation Excerpt :Not only are DAAs enacted to afford the promise of cure amongst infected individuals, they potentiate a future without hepatitis C at the level of populations, territories, and nation states (Rhodes &Lancaster, 2019b). This population-level impact is evidence-made through mathematical models of theoretical projection (Hickman et al., 2015; Pitcher et al., 2018), in which the prevention potential of hepatitis C treatment curative outcomes is projected at a scale sufficient to reduce the pool of infections, and thus transmissions, in the population at risk, including accounting for rates of re-infection amongst those treated (Martin et al., 2011). The publication of models theorising hepatitis C cure as having treatment-as-prevention effects is a foundational moment in evidence-making (Martin et al., 2011, 2013a; Zeiler et al., 2010).
Global Epidemiology of Viral Hepatitis
2020, Gastroenterology Clinics of North America