Mathematical modelling of hepatitis C treatment for injecting drug users

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtbi.2010.12.041Get rights and content

Abstract

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is a blood-borne infection that can lead to progressive liver failure, cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma and death. In developed countries, the majority of HCV infections are transmitted via injecting drug users (IDUs). Despite effective antiviral treatment for HCV, very few active IDUs are treated. Reluctance to treat is partially due to the risk of reinfection. We develop a mathematical model of HCV transmission amongst active IDUs, and examine the potential effect of antiviral treatment. As most mathematical models of interventions utilise a treatment function proportional to the infected population, but many policy implementations set fixed yearly targets for specific numbers treated, we study the effects of using two different treatment terms: annually treating a proportion of infecteds or a fixed number of infecteds. We examine the behaviour of the two treatment models and find different bifurcation behaviours in each case. We calculate analytical solutions for the treatment level needed for disease clearance or control, and observe that achievable levels of treatment can result in control or eradication across a wide range of prevalence levels. Finally, we calculate the sensitivity of the critical treatment threshold to the model parameters, and find that for a given observed prevalence, the injecting duration and infection risk play the most important role in determining the treatment level needed. By contrast, the sensitivity analysis indicates the presence (or absence) of immunity does not alter the treatment threshold. We conclude by discussing the public health implications of this work, and comment on the importance and feasibility of utilising treatment as prevention for HCV spread amongst IDUs.

Introduction

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is a blood-borne disease with an estimated global prevalence of 2–3%, or 130–170 million people, and is one of the leading causes of chronic liver disease (Shepard et al., 2005). If left untreated, about 7–18% of those infected will progress to liver disease within 20 years, which can result in progressive liver failure, cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma and death (Seeff, 2009).

In developed countries, the primary mode of transmission is amongst injecting drug users (IDUs) through needle and syringe sharing, with over 80% of new cases in the UK attributed to injecting drugs (ACMD, 2009). HCV is easily transmitted amongst IDUs, with 15–90% of IDUs testing positive for HCV antibodies (Page-Shafer et al., 2008, Judd et al., 2005, Hahn et al., 2002). Current preventative measures to reduce HCV transmission such as health education and advice, needle and syringe exchange, and opiate substitution therapy aim to prevent transmission by reducing unsafe injecting (ACMD, 2009). However, public health surveillance indicates substantial decreases in prevalence have not been achieved (Palmateer et al., 2010).

HCV antiviral treatment (peginterferon-α and ribavirin) is effective, resulting in viral clearance in 45–80% of cases, depending on HCV genotype (NICE, 2000). Prior to 2002, guidelines in the US and UK recommended against treating active IDUs. However, current guidelines now do not exclude IDUs from treatment eligibility, given mounting evidence that IDUs exhibit a similar response to treatment, and are just as compliant with treatment as ex- or non-IDUs (Hellard et al., 2009, NICE, 2006, Shepherd et al., 2007, NIH, 2002). Nevertheless, despite these recommendations and the high numbers of IDUs infected, very few (<34%) active IDUs have ever been treated (Grebely et al., 2006, Seal et al., 2005). Studies on treatment barriers have indicated a reluctance to treat active IDUs due to the possibility of subsequent reinfection (Booth et al., 2001, Reimer et al., 2005, Foster, 2008).

We examine the potential of antiviral treatment as a prevention strategy for HCV amongst IDUs. By using antiviral treatment to reduce prevalence amongst active IDUs, the treatment can act to reduce the risk of infection for other IDUs. But to what extent? This paper examines the potential impact of HCV treatment on prevalence and transmission, including the possibility of reinfection. We incorporate two treatment scenarios (treating a proportion of infected IDUs, and a fixed number of IDUs) and examine the resulting dynamics and treatment needed for eradication. Treating a constant proportion of the population is the function most commonly used in infectious disease modelling. However, annually treating a fixed number of IDUs would be more likely in the initial stages of a treatment delivery programme, or in situations with budget constraints. Hence, we analyse both situations.

Section snippets

Background and assumptions for the model

Infection with HCV leads to a brief acute stage, which is relatively short (on the order of weeks to months) in comparison to the prolonged chronic stage (on the order of decades) (ECMDDA, 2004). In the first few weeks, viral levels may be undetectable, increasing but possibly remaining low during the remainder of the acute stage. A fraction of people (about 26%) spontaneously clear the acute infection (Micallef et al., 2006). The specifics of spontaneous clearance are not well known, although

Details and explanation of the model

We use a system of ordinary differential equations to describe the transmission of HCV amongst active IDUs. We utilise a four compartment model, tracking susceptible, chronically infected, treated, and immune IDUs. Susceptible IDUs become infected through sharing of needles with an infected IDU. About one quarter spontaneously clear the infection, and become susceptible or immune. The remaining three-quarters progress to chronic infection. Chronic infecteds can be treated, with a certain chance

Proportional treatment

At steady state, N=θ/μ. Setting the left-hand side of Eqs. (7), (10) to zero (with g(c) defined by (12) and solving for the equilibrium values we find two steady states. One is the trivial disease-free steady state,FP1=(x1*,c1*,t1*,z1*)=(1,0,0,0).The second equilibrium is the infected endemic steady state, defined by FP2=(x2, c2, t2, z2), wheret2*=ϕc2*ω+μ,x2*=μ(ω+μ)+ωασϕc2*π(1δ+δξ)(ω+μ)c2*+μ(ω+μ),z2*=πδξωασϕ(c2*)2+πδξμ(ω+μ)c2*μπ(1δ+δξ)c2*+μ2+ωα(1α)ϕc2*μ(ω+μ),c2*=μ(ωμ)ω(1α)ϕω+μϕμπ(1

Numerical methods

Numerical simulations of Eqs. (7), (11) were performed using the MATLAB ODE solver, ode45. Because HCV is not in the breakout epidemic phase in the majority of real-world settings, the simulations were run until steady state (τ=600 years), and then treatment initiated. The parameter values are given in Table 2. For specific predictions at untreated equilibrium infected prevalences of 20%, 40%, and 60%, the values of π used were π=0.1468, 0.2033, and 0.3307, respectively.

The calculation of the

Discussion and conclusions

In this paper we analyse a mathematical model of HCV transmission amongst active IDUs, examining the potential for antiviral treatment to reduce HCV transmission. Despite guidelines stating that current IDUs should not be excluded from obtaining treatment, very few are treated, with the risk of reinfection used as justification for withholding treatment. However, our model indicates that antiviral treatment could act as a prevention measure for the wider IDU community by reducing prevalence

Acknowledgements

Grant support: This manuscript was supported by the Scottish Government Hepatitis C Action Plan, NCCRCD/NIHR CRDHB, and the MRC New Investigator Award.

References (32)

  • ECMDDA, 2004. Hepatitis C and injecting drug use: impact, costs and policy options. Office for Official Publications of...
  • G.R. Foster

    Injecting drug users with chronic hepatitis C: should they be offered antiviral therapy?

    Addiction

    (2008)
  • J.A. Hahn et al.

    Hepatitis C virus seroconversion among young injection drug users: relationships and risks

    The Journal of Infectious Diseases

    (2002)
  • M. Hellard et al.

    Hepatitis C treatment for injection drug users: a review of the available evidence

    Clinical Infectious Diseases

    (2009)
  • M. Hickman et al.

    Hepatitis C virus (HCV) prevalence and injecting risk behaviour in multiple sites in England in 2004

    Journal of Viral Hepatitis

    (2007)
  • M. Hickman et al.

    Assessing IDU prevalence and health consequences (HCV, overdose and drug-related mortality) in a primary care trust: implications for public health action

    Journal of Public Health (Oxford)

    (2009)
  • Cited by (87)

    • How to think with models and targets: Hepatitis C elimination as a numbering performance

      2021, International Journal of Drug Policy
      Citation Excerpt :

      Not only are DAAs enacted to afford the promise of cure amongst infected individuals, they potentiate a future without hepatitis C at the level of populations, territories, and nation states (Rhodes &Lancaster, 2019b). This population-level impact is evidence-made through mathematical models of theoretical projection (Hickman et al., 2015; Pitcher et al., 2018), in which the prevention potential of hepatitis C treatment curative outcomes is projected at a scale sufficient to reduce the pool of infections, and thus transmissions, in the population at risk, including accounting for rates of re-infection amongst those treated (Martin et al., 2011). The publication of models theorising hepatitis C cure as having treatment-as-prevention effects is a foundational moment in evidence-making (Martin et al., 2011, 2013a; Zeiler et al., 2010).

    • Global Epidemiology of Viral Hepatitis

      2020, Gastroenterology Clinics of North America
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text