Innovation in healthcare: Issues and future trends

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.02.022Get rights and content

Abstract

Despite the fact that there has been significant improvement in the healthcare industry, inefficiency still exists and little accomplished in understanding how to overcome those inefficiencies using innovation in healthcare. This study seeks to answer the following research questions. How do executives and practitioners define the term innovation in healthcare? How do healthcare organizations come up with innovative ideas and how do they make those innovative decisions? How do healthcare executives and practitioners roll out those innovative changes in their organizations? What strategies do these organizations apply toward the formulation of innovative decisions? What role does information technology play in the innovative process? The researchers conducted in-depth interviews to answer several research questions. The respondents included 21C-level healthcare executives from 15 healthcare units. Results of the decision-making processes used by these executives concerning innovation conclude with a practical model. Finally, implications for practitioners and policy makers and future trends complete the paper.

Introduction

Why and how do doctors and administrators in healthcare organizations implement innovation? Is adoption of innovative ideas in healthcare organizations due to attributes of environments, organizations, leaders, members and/or innovations themselves (Meyer and Goes, 1988)? Or, does the adoption of innovative ideas benefit the healthcare organization by minimizing the error rate that is due to complex interactions between different players in healthcare organizations (Sobrio and Keller, 2007, Kimberley and Evanisko, 1981) thus making healthcare organizations less prone to catastrophic consequences, such as high medical costs, infections, injuries and even death — key indicators of a successful healthcare organization?

Besides the above queries, other research questions that boggle the minds of healthcare executives, practitioners and scholars are: what are the essential characteristics and associated requirements underlying innovation in healthcare service provider firms? How do healthcare service providers generate new ideas and put those ideas into practice? What role does information technology (IT) play in innovative strategy in order to make those strategies successful? In-depth interviews conducted with C-level healthcare executives help answer these questions.

In the literature, success, often defined in terms of low incidence of bad results, happens frequently (Kaplan, 2002). Organizations, such as healthcare provider firms, are supposed to be high-reliability organizations (HRO) where managers make decisions in an extremely unpredictable and dynamic environment. In addition, organizations have to rely on complex interactions between patients (e.g., patient advocacy groups), payers (e.g., health insurers), providers (e.g., physicians) and suppliers (e.g., pharmaceuticals). The success of those organizations depends on “the accurate, timely description of process and conditions” (Nemeth and Cook, 2007, pp: 3408).

While understanding the success of HROs is important, it is also important to understand that these organizations face certain challenges. Understanding the challenges faced by healthcare organizations (e.g., multiple medical records of patients, incorrect doses, wrong medication, etc.) and how to overcome those challenges using innovation in health and healthcare are major concerns for healthcare executives and practitioners. Despite the fact that there has been significant improvement in the healthcare industry, inefficiency still exists (Prada, 2008) and scholars that will help practitioners understand how to overcome those inefficiencies using innovative methods in healthcare have done not much. Fragmented views about innovation also exist among healthcare practitioners.

These trends suggest that investigation is a necessary step in applying and advancing theories to answer the following research questions that emerge from this paradox. How do healthcare executives and practitioners define the term innovation in healthcare? How do healthcare organizations come up with innovative ideas, and how do they roll out innovative changes in the organizations? What strategies do these organizations apply toward the formulation of innovative decisions? What role does information technology (IT) play in the innovative process?

Organization of the paper follows: First, we provide a literature review with a brief discussion of concepts based on management, sociology and marketing literature. Next, we present the related literature that answers the above research questions relative to healthcare organizations. A summary of results from semi-structured interviews conducted to understand the decision-making processes used by different types of healthcare executives and providers in providing innovative healthcare services, including those using IT, is provided. Based on the literature review and summary of the results, a practical model that showcases the interactions in healthcare organizations and information exchanges between various components during the decision-making processes develops. Finally, empirical results, along with related implications for practitioners and policy makers and future trends, conclude the paper.

Section snippets

Literature review

Innovation is driven by strategic implementation and/or assimilation of information technology (IT) and/or information systems (IS). Studies on innovation have indicated that success and survival of the health care industry depend on the effectiveness and efficiency of IT/IS uses or implementation (Liaw, 2002). Effective and easy use of technology should enable innovation in the health care industry.

The technology acceptance model (TAM) (Venkatesh and Ramesh, 2006, Venkatesh et al., 2003,

Methodology

This project involves the exploration of the following three research questions. (1) What are the essential characteristics and associated requirements underlying innovation by healthcare service providers? (2) How do healthcare service providers generate new ideas and roll out the ideas into practices? (3) What role does IT play in the innovative strategy? While addressing these research questions is the primary objective of this research, this study also develops a practical model that

Future trends of U.S. healthcare services

Based on the semi-structured interviews with C-level healthcare executives, one can expect several major changes in U.S. healthcare services in the future. Those future trends relate to (1) information technology and databases, (2) outcome based management, and (3) healthcare reforms at various levels (district and state levels).

Advances in information technology and databases will help healthcare executives and practitioners establish the groundwork for fundamental changes within the

Implications

The following section explains some of the theoretical and practical implications of this study that could lead the direction for future research.

References (47)

  • R.G. Cooper et al.

    What distinguishes the top performing new products in financial services?

    J Prod Innov Manage

    (1994)
  • S. Ha et al.

    Consumer e-shopping acceptance: antecedents in a technology acceptance model

    J Bus Res

    (2009)
  • F.S. Wu et al.

    Diffusion models of mobile telephony

    J Bus Res

    (2010)
  • R.A. Atun et al.

    Diffusion of complex health innovations—implementation of primary health care reforms in Bosnia and Herzegovina

    Health Policy Plann

    (2007)
  • D.S. Bajwa et al.

    Factors in the global assimilation of collaborative information technologies: an exploratory investigation in five regions

    J Manage Inf Syst

    (2008)
  • S.W. Becker et al.

    The innovative organization: a selective view of current theory and research

    J Bus

    (1967)
  • F. Damanpour

    Organizational innovation: a meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators

    Acad Manage J

    (1991)
  • F. Damanpour et al.

    Organizational innovation and performance: the problem of organizational lag

    Adm Sci Q

    (1984)
  • F.D. Davis

    Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology

    MIS Q

    (1989)
  • R. Deshpande et al.

    Organizational culture and marketing: defining the research agenda

    J Mark

    (1989)
  • P. Drucker

    The discipline of innovation

    Harv Bus Rev

    (2002)
  • M. Ekedahl et al.

    Coping processes in a multidisciplinary healthcare team — a comparison of nurses in cancer care and hospital chaplains

    Eur J Cancer Care

    (2008)
  • R. Evangelista et al.

    Measuring innovation in services

    Res Eval

    (1995)
  • R.G. Fichman et al.

    The illusory diffusion of innovation: an examination of assimilation gaps

    Inf Syst Res

    (1999)
  • L. Fitzgerald et al.

    Interlocking interactions, the diffusion of innovations in health care

    Hum Relat

    (2002)
  • J. Flower

    The future of healthcare

    Encyclopedia of the Future

    (1996)
  • Greer, AL, Greer, SA, Meyers, AD. The Diffusion of Medical Technology to Community Hospitals: An Institutional...
  • N. Inamdar et al.

    Applying the balanced scorecard in healthcare provider organizations

    J Healthc Manage

    (2002)
  • H. Kaplan

    Event reporting, mindfulness and the high reliability organization: Is the glass half empty

    Vox Sang

    (2002)
  • P. Kelly et al.

    Technological Innovation: A Critical Review of Current Knowledge

    (1978)
  • N. Khatri et al.

    Medical errors and quality of care: from control to commitment

    Calif Manage Rev

    (2006)
  • J.R. Kimberley et al.

    Organizational innovation: the influence of individual, organizational and contextual factors on hospital adoption of technological and administrative innovations

    Acad Manage J

    (1981)
  • H. Lester et al.

    Of family medicines from the quality and outcomes framework in the United Kingdom

    Fam Med

    (2007)
  • Cited by (0)

    The authors acknowledge and appreciate the healthcare executives and practitioners who committed to assisting in this research in an effort to contribute to improvements in the healthcare industry.

    View full text