Drug intake behaviour of immigrants during pregnancy

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2004.09.016Get rights and content

Abstract

Objective:

To assess differences between native Spanish and immigrant pregnant women in behaviour relating to the use of medications during pregnancy.

Study design:

This cross-sectional study was carried out at the department of obstetrics and gynaecology of an acute-care teaching hospital in the city of Barcelona, Spain. A total of 1103 women who gave birth at the hospital during a 1-year period were enrolled in the study. Each woman was interviewed by a gynaecologist during her stay in hospital after delivery, with special reference to drug use during the pregnancy. Drug exposure was assigned to trimesters, and drugs were divided into therapeutic groups, while the women taking part were divided up by nationality, educational level, parity and age. Data were analysed using bivariate, multivariate, and cluster analyses.

Results:

Slightly over half (55.7%) of the women were native to Spain and 44.3% were immigrants of other nationalities. About a quarter, or 25.4%, of pregnant patients had not taken any drugs during their pregnancies. The most frequent drugs taken by the others were vitamins, which were used mostly by Spanish women, followed by analgesics, which were mostly taken by non-Spanish western women. The largest group who had taken folic acid was made up of non-Spanish western women, while the Asiatic patients had taken this in the smallest proportion of cases.

Conclusions:

Spanish patients and immigrants from other western countries showed a similar behaviour in terms of drug intake during pregnancy, which was different from the behavioural patterns seen in pregnant patients from developing countries.

Introduction

At present, clinical recommendations advise that aking drugs should not be taken during pregnancy, with the exception of any that are necessary for the expectant mothers’ health during the pregnancy. In the early 1960s, with the recognition of thalidomide as the drug responsible for severe congenital abnormalities in newborns, the term “teratogenic” was coined [1]. When any medication is prescribed during pregnancy, the possible risks and benefits that the drug could have for both the mother and the fetus have to be assessed [2], [3], [4]. On the other hand, in 1980, a first study showing the possible prophylactic effects of folic acid supplementation against the development of neural tube defects prompted the publication of an international consensus paper on the benefits of folic acid supplementation during the first trimester of pregnancy [5], [6]. The intake of drugs during pregnancy in Spain has been described in other studies [7], [8], [9], [10] conducted under the sponsorship of the European Regional Office of the World Health Organisation, but the use of drugs among the immigrant population, which is constantly increasing in size with the increasingly frequent waves of migration in Europe, has not been assessed previously.

Therefore, the aim of this study was to compare the behavioural pattern relating to drug use during pregnancy in two population groups of pregnant women, Spaniards and immigrants, taking advantage of the fact that the hospital in which the study was carried out is the medical referral centre of an area in the city of Barcelona in which a large number of immigrants are concentrated. In particular, in the Service of Obstetrics and Gynaecology at this centre, about 40% of babies are born to women of non-Spanish origin.

Section snippets

Methods

In order to collect data on drug use during pregnancy, every woman who was in labour in the hospital, regardless of the outcome for the fetus (alive or dead) and mode of delivery, and who gave consent to enrollment in the study, was interviewed by a gynaecologist during her stay in the hospital after delivery. The study period was 12 months (January to December, 2002). The study protocol was approved by the institutional review board.

A structured questionnaire [9] was specifically designed for

Statistical analysis

Categorical data are expressed as numbers and percentages, and continuous data as mean and standard deviation (S.D.) or median and interquartile range (25th−75th). Data were stratified by drug class and patient nationality. Categorical variables were compared with the Chi-square (χ2) test or Fisher's exact probability test and corrected with the Bonferroni technique for multiple comparisons. Quantitative data were analysed with Student's t-test and the Mann-Whitney U-test. Analysis of variance

Results

A total of 1103 consecutive women who gave birth in our centre during the study period fulfilled the inclusion criteria and agreed to participate in the study. A total of 614 women were native Spaniards, and the remaining 516 were immigrants from other countries. The distribution of immigrants by nationality is shown in Table 1. Women from South America accounted for 17.5%, women from Asia for 12.1%, women from Africa for 8.6%, women from eastern European countries for 3.8%, and women from

Discussion

The use of drugs during pregnancy has been assessed in a number of studies [8], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], but as far as we know differences between native and immigrant populations of pregnant women in drug utilisation patterns have not previously been analysed. Migration is increasingly frequent in Europe, particularly in countries in the Mediterranean basin. Because of differences associated with socio-cultural and religious factors and with customs and beliefs, pregnant women might be

Acknowledgement

We thank Marta Pulido, MD, for editorial assistance with our manuscript.

References (19)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (11)

  • Determinants of medication use in a multi-ethnic population of pregnant women: A cross-sectional study

    2014, European Journal of Contraception and Reproductive Health Care
View all citing articles on Scopus

Presented at the III Congrès Català d’Obstericia i Ginecologia, Barcelona (Spain), April 2–4, 2003.

View full text