Factors influencing the use of complementary and alternative medicine and whether patients inform their primary care physician

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctim.2011.10.001Get rights and content

Summary

Objectives

Use of complementary and alternative medicines (CAMs) is widespread. Several studies have explored why individuals chose to use CAM but there are fewer data to explain how its use ‘dovetails’ with conventional medicine. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of CAM use in the adult population in Australia and the proportion that seek advice or tell their primary care physician after CAM use, and also to investigate which demographic characteristics, health behaviours and health status are associated with CAM use and disclosure.

Design

A cross sectional survey. Methods: a random sample of 1261 adults was interviewed as part of 2010 Queensland Social Survey, which contained questions about CAM use, frequency of use, types of CAM used, reasons for use, discussing and reporting CAM use with the doctor and confidence in CAM use. Relationships were explored using bivariate and multiple logistic regression. Main outcome measures: use of CAM; sought advice from doctor before CAM use; informed doctor after CAM use.

Results

61.7% of respondents had used self-prescribed CAM or visited a CAM practitioner. Being female and being younger predicted CAM use. Being male and in better health predicted seeking advice from the doctor before and also after CAM use.

Conclusion

Our results confirm the relatively high use of CAM in Queensland, Australia and found that a significant proportion of people did not seek advice from their primary care physician before using CAM, or disclose its use afterwards. These factors should be taken into account in the doctor–patient consultation.

Introduction

The use of complementary and alternative medicines (CAMs) is widespread. In western industrialised countries the proportion of the population that uses CAM ranges from 10 to 52%.1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 In Australia especially there is evidence that the popularity of CAM is growing, and that it is a large and increasing component of health care.7, 8, 9 CAM users are more likely to be female,1, 2, 7, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 have higher income,1, 4, 5, 7, 9, 12 be better educated,1, 7, 11, 12, 15 be in paid employment,1, 9 be in poorer health,15, 16 have chronic conditions,4, 12, 17, 18 belong to certain ethnic groups15 and geographic regions.2, 7, 9, 12, 16, 19 CAM use also varies by cigarettes or alcohol use.2 It is higher in people with a greater sense of control over their health.12, 20 People are more likely to use CAM if they believe that there are health benefits; if there is support from others regarding its use and if they are not discouraged by potential barriers.2, 21, 22 People also use CAM to avoid the unpleasant side effects of some drugs or because of the limitations of conventional medicine.10, 22 Fewer published data, however, have explained how CAM ‘dovetails’ with conventional medicine.22, 23, 24

Although several studies have explored the determinants of CAM use, fewer investigators have examined the factors associated with seeking advice from the doctor before or after CAM use. This is a cause for concern, especially if patients seek advice from herbalists when taking medications prescribed by their doctor, thereby running the risk of serious adverse drugs interactions.4 Studies from the US and Australia suggest that such non-disclosure is high and that it has not decreased in recent years.3, 7, 21 This may relate to the characteristics of the patient,12 the doctor–patient consultation style,25 and/or fears of medical scepticism about CAM use.17, 26 There is a common perception among users of CAM that it ‘will do no harm’, which may not be true.1, 7, 23, 24, 26 These issues indicate that more empirical research is needed to explore the characteristics of CAM users and factors influencing whether people inform their primary care physician before and after use.

The aims of this study were to determine the prevalence of CAM use in the adult population in Queensland, Australia, and the proportion who seek advice or tell their primary care physician after CAM use; and to investigate which demographic characteristics, health behaviours and health status are associated with CAM use and disclosure.

Section snippets

Methods

A cross-sectional design was used to obtain self-report data from a random sample of 1261 adults in Australia. This survey was one element in the 6th annual Queensland Social Survey (QSS) conducted by the Population Research Laboratory at Central Queensland University.27

Results

A response rate of 35.2% was obtained. The index of dissimilarity for the overall sample of the QSS 2010 was 19.3, which demonstrates that there was a small variation from the Queensland population from which they were drawn with respect to age. There appeared to be over sampling in the 45–65+ age categories and under sampling in the under 45 age categories.

Discussion

The aims of this study were to determine the prevalence of CAM use in the adult population in Australia and also the proportion who seek advice or tell their primary care physician after CAM use, and to investigate which demographic characteristics, health behaviours and health status are associated with CAM use and disclosure. Our prevalence figure for lifetime use of CAM was in line with the results of other studies and review findings.27, 35, 36 Consistent with Thomas and Coleman5 our

Conclusion

Our results revealed a relatively high use of CAM in the population of Queensland, Australia.27 It found that a significant proportion of people do not seek advice from their primary care physician before using CAM, or disclose its use afterwards. CAM does not appear to ‘dovetail’ well with conventional medicine at this time. Age and gender were significant predictors in CAM use and gender and health status were significant predictors of whether patients seek advice before, or after CAM use. As

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest in regard to this paper.

Acknowledgements

We like to thank Christine Hanley from the Population Research Laboratory, Institute for Health and Social Science Research, Central Queensland University, Australia for assistance with data handling and the final sampling report.

References (46)

  • D. Barraco et al.

    Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) use patterns and disclosure to physicians in acute coronary syndrome patients

    Complementary Therapies in Medicine

    (2005)
  • M.E. Hyland et al.

    Developing a measure of attitudes; the holistic complementary and alternative medicine questionnaire

    Complementary Therapies in Medicine

    (2003)
  • A.R White et al.

    A blinded investigation into the accuracy of reflexology charts

    Complementary Therapies in Medicine

    (2000)
  • K.D. Willison et al.

    Enhancing chronic disease management; a review of key issues and strategies

    Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice

    (2007)
  • W.K. Mummery et al.

    The epidemiology of medically attended sport and recreational injuries in Queensland

    Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport

    (2002)
  • K.R. Evenson et al.

    Evaluating change in physical activity with the building of a multi-use trail

    American Journal of Preventive Medicine

    (2005)
  • W. Brown et al.

    Comparison of surveys used to measure physical activity

    Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health

    (2004)
  • D.M. Eisenberg et al.

    Trends in alternative medicine use in the United States, 1990–1997. Results of a follow-up national survey

    Journal of the American Medical Association

    (1998)
  • A. Metcalfe et al.

    Use of complementary and alternative medicine by those with a chronic disease and the general population – results of a national population based survey

    BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine

    (2010)
  • K. Thomas et al.

    Use of complementary or alternative medicine in a general population in Great Britain. Results from the National Omnibus survey

    Journal of Public Health

    (2004)
  • A.H. MacLennan et al.

    The continuing use of complementary and alternative medicine in South Australia: costs and beliefs in 2004

    The Medical Journal of Australia

    (2006)
  • C.C.I. Xue et al.

    Complementary and alternative medicine use in Australia: a national population-based survey

    Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine

    (2007)
  • H.A. Tindle et al.

    Factors associated with the use of mind body therapies among United States adults with muscloskeletal pain

    Complementary Therapies in Medicine

    (2004)
  • Cited by (92)

    • Asthmatic patient's preferences regarding frequency of physician consultation

      2021, Saudi Pharmaceutical Journal
      Citation Excerpt :

      While our study focused on patients visiting for asthma follow-up visit and found that most of the patients had intermittent and mild asthma and did not exhibited any significant (p = 0.003) side effects of treatment or faced too much limitation due to asthma. The previous literature has proved that patients also used complementary and alternative treatment method for asthma (Thomson et al., 2012). However, evidence-based data for efficacy and safety of alternative treatments is still lacking so before starting any alternative methods, its better if patients discuss with their primary physician to avoid any harmful effects (Eisenberg, 1997).

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    The CAM element of the Queensland Social Survey was funded by the School of Nursing, Midwifery & Health, University of Stirling, Stirling, Scotland.

    View full text