Elsevier

The Lancet

Volume 370, Issue 9595, 13–19 October 2007, Pages 1358-1369
The Lancet

Review
Continuum of care for maternal, newborn, and child health: from slogan to service delivery

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61578-5Get rights and content

Summary

The continuum of care has become a rallying call to reduce the yearly toll of half a million maternal deaths, 4 million neonatal deaths, and 6 million child deaths. The continuum for maternal, newborn, and child health usually refers to continuity of individual care. Continuity of care is necessary throughout the lifecycle (adolescence, pregnancy, childbirth, the postnatal period, and childhood) and also between places of caregiving (including households and communities, outpatient and outreach services, and clinical-care settings). We define a population-level or public-health framework based on integrated service delivery throughout the lifecycle, and propose eight packages to promote health for mothers, babies, and children. These packages can be used to deliver more than 190 separate interventions, which would be difficult to scale up one by one. The packages encompass three which are delivered through clinical care (reproductive health, obstetric care, and care of sick newborn babies and children); four through outpatient and outreach services (reproductive health, antenatal care, postnatal care and child health services); and one through integrated family and community care throughout the lifecycle. Mothers and babies are at high risk in the first days after birth, and the lack of a defined postnatal care package is an important gap, which also contributes to discontinuity between maternal and child health programmes. Similarly, because the family and community package tends not to be regarded as part of the health system, few countries have made systematic efforts to scale it up or integrate it with other levels of care. Building the continuum of care for maternal, newborn, and child health with these packages will need effectiveness trials in various settings; policy support for integration; investment to strengthen health systems; and results-based operational management, especially at district level.

Introduction

The continuum of care has recently been highlighted as a core principle of programmes for maternal, newborn, and child health, and as a means to reduce the burden of half a million maternal deaths, 4 million neonatal deaths, and 6 million children who die between the ages of 1 month and 5 years.1, 2, 3 The continuum of care is a recurrent theme in the World Health Report 20051 and The Lancet Neonatal Survival Series.2 The continuum also provides the foundation for the conceptual framework of the Partnership for Maternal, Newborn and Child Health (PMNCH)4 and Opportunities for Africa's Newborns.5 The Global Business Plan for Millennium Development Goals 4 and 5, which was called for at the World Health Assembly 2007, also emphasises the continuum of care.6

The goal of this approach is to avoid dichotomies, between either mothers and children, places of service delivery, or single health issues (table 1).7, 8 Within the continuum, all women should have access to reproductive health choices and care during pregnancy and childbirth, and all babies should be able to grow into children who survive and thrive.9

The continuum-of-care approach has been used as a rallying call for integration of programmes for maternal, neonatal, and child health, but often without a clear application. Rapid escalations in investment, related to MDG 4 for child health and MDG 5 for maternal health, have increased the need for a solid framework for implementation and assessment. Who is the continuum of care for, and what are the essential service-delivery packages within it? What coverage does such care have? What are the challenges to building and tracking results for an effective continuum of care within existing health systems?

Section snippets

Defining the continuum of care

The term was initially applied in the 1970s to the integration of research and practice for provision of a continuum of care for elderly people.10 In subsequent decades, use of the term has broadened, although it most commonly refers to individual patient care and case management, and to promotion of appropriately directed care with a series of linkages to ensure that no patient is lost to follow-up. A systematic review11 showed that most of the 638 papers on the continuum-of-care approach

Building the continuum of care with health-service packages

Studies suggest that high coverage and quality of essential packages could avert about 67% of neonatal and child deaths in 60 priority countries worldwide.24 These analyses have included packages for maternal and child health, basic and emergency obstetric care, and postnatal care.24 A functional continuum can increase client and provider satisfaction.11 At the public-health level, linkages between integrated packages can maximise the efficiency with which the scarce human and financial

Packages of interventions for delivery within the continuum of care

Several Lancet Series have dealt with periods along the continuum of care, such as sexual and reproductive health28 and maternal,20 neonatal,18 and child19 survival. Other Series will focus or have focused on nutrition29 and the links between early-life events, poverty, and the environment of long-term development.30 These Series have increased attention on the goals of universal coverage of effective interventions for health of mothers, newborn babies, and children and of reduction of

Operational strategies to strengthen care and linkages between levels of care

Both supply of services and demand for care need to increase. At the clinical-care level the predominant challenge is human resources. Table 2 outlines key barriers and operational solutions according to service-delivery approaches. Community mobilisation can increase demand for care and improve access through communication (eg, radios and mobile phones) and community referral solutions (eg, stretcher teams, transport cooperatives, and maternity waiting homes) to better connect households and

Tracking and accelerating coverage along the continuum of care

Figure 3 shows coverage indicators for selected packages for the health of mothers, neonates, and children along the continuum of care for sub-Saharan Africa and south Asia.5 Even in the world's worst-off regions, population-based outreach packages of antenatal care and immunisation had good coverage (figure 3). Compliance with immunisation was reasonable, as shown by high coverage of immunisation for diphtheria, pertussis, and tetanus, which ranged from 83% at the first dose to 65% for the

Towards scaling up an effective continuum of care

Elements that affect the functionality of health systems—human-resource capacity, health-facility infrastructure, supply systems, financial resources, government stewardship, district-level management, and monitoring—will also impinge on efforts to scale up packages for health of mothers, neonates, and children within the continuum.50, 55 Systematic identification of local challenges; attention to underlying causes of ill health; and adaptation of package complexity in terms of healthworker

From slogan to saving lives

The continuum of care for maternal, neonatal, and child health is much more than a slogan. If the eight proposed packages could be implemented to reach most families worldwide, then every year the lives of up to two-thirds of 10 million babies and children could be saved,35, 45 and many of the half million maternal deaths and 3·2 million stillbirths prevented. This would accelerate progress towards MDGs 1, 4, 5, and 6: to improve maternal health; reduce child mortality; combat infectious

References (57)

  • A Glasier et al.

    Sexual and reproductive health: a matter of life and death

    Lancet

    (2006)
  • RE Black et al.

    Maternal and child undernutrition—call for papers

    Lancet

    (2007)
  • PL Engle et al.

    Strategies to avoid the loss of developmental potential in more than 200 million children in the developing world

    Lancet

    (2007)
  • O Campbell et al.

    Strategies for reducing maternal mortality: getting on with what works

    Lancet

    (2006)
  • GL Darmstadt et al.

    Evidence-based, cost-effective interventions: how many newborn babies can we save?

    Lancet

    (2005)
  • J Sepulveda et al.

    Improvement of child survival in Mexico: the diagonal approach

    Lancet

    (2006)
  • KS Khan et al.

    WHO analysis of causes of maternal death: a systematic review

    Lancet

    (2006)
  • J Borghi et al.

    Mobilising financial resources for maternal health

    Lancet

    (2006)
  • J Cleland et al.

    Family planning: the unfinished agenda

    Lancet

    (2006)
  • J Villar et al.

    WHO antenatal care randomised trial for the evaluation of a new model of routine antenatal care

    Lancet

    (2001)
  • G Jones et al.

    How many child deaths can we prevent this year?

    Lancet

    (2003)
  • AL Morrow et al.

    Efficacy of home-based peer counselling to promote exclusive breastfeeding: a randomised controlled trial

    Lancet

    (1999)
  • RJ Derman et al.

    Oral misoprostol in preventing postpartum haemorrhage in resource-poor communities: a randomised controlled trial

    Lancet

    (2006)
  • DS Manandhar et al.

    Effect of a participatory intervention with women's groups on birth outcomes in Nepal: cluster-randomised controlled trial

    Lancet

    (2004)
  • R Knippenberg et al.

    Systematic scaling up of neonatal care in countries

    Lancet

    (2005)
  • J Bryce et al.

    Countdown to 2015: tracking intervention coverage for child survival

    Lancet

    (2006)
  • P Travis et al.

    Overcoming health-systems constraints to achieve the Millennium Development Goals

    Lancet

    (2004)
  • T Powell-Jackson et al.

    Countdown to 2015: tracking donor assistance to maternal, newborn, and child health

    Lancet

    (2006)
  • Cited by (690)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text