The logistic modeling of sensitivity, specificity, and predictive value of a diagnostic test
References (24)
- et al.
Factors affecting sensitivity and specificity of exercise electrocardiography. Multivariable analysis
Am J Med
(1984) - et al.
Estimation of the multivariate logistic risk function: a comparison of the discriminant function and maximum likelihood approaches
J Chron Dis
(1971) - et al.
A model for assessing the sensitivity and specificity of tests subject to selection bias. Application to exercise radio nuclide ventriculography for diagnosis of coronary artery disease
J Chron Dis
(1986) - et al.
Epidemiology: an Introductory Text
(1974) - et al.
Clinical Epidemiology: the Essentials
(1982) Predictive value of a single diagnostic test in unselected populations
N Engl J Med
(1966)- et al.
Analysis of probability as an aid in the clinical diagnosis of coronary-artery disease
N Engl J Med
(1979) - et al.
Comparing new and old screening tests when a reference procedure cannot be performed on all screenees
Am J Epidemiol
(1987) - et al.
- et al.
Epidemiologic Research: Principles and Quantitative Methods
(1982)
Case-Control Studies. Design, Conduct, Analysis
(1982)
Joint dependence of risk of coronary heart disease on serum cholesterol and systolic blood pressure: a discriminant function analysis
Cited by (139)
Accuracy of physical examination in detecting central venous catheter-associated thrombosis in critically ill children
2022, Thrombosis ResearchCitation Excerpt :Data was presented as median (inter-quartile range, IQR) or count (percentage, %). We used logistic regression model as our primary analytic model to determine the accuracy, i.e., sensitivity and sensitivity, of the index test [21]. Primary analytic cohort included all children.
Comparison of routine computed tomography and plain X-ray imaging for malleolar fractures—How much do we miss?
2022, Foot and Ankle SurgeryImproving CT accuracy in the diagnosis of COVID-19 in a hospital setting
2021, Clinical Imaging
Copyright © 1992 Published by Elsevier Inc.