General paper
Which resources pay for treatment? A model for estimating the informal economy of health

https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(95)00412-2Get rights and content

Abstract

The model proposed is a means for (i) documenting the resources a woman deploys to choose, seek, find, get and pay for treatment; (ii) comparing what she has/does with a neighbour facing similar symptoms and problems, and (iii) understanding which difference between them makes most difference to the way they manage illness. In a narrow economic perspective, only tangible items with easily enumerated values are called resources, and only the formal economy counts. This model allows assessment of the value of both formal and informal resources in the household system. It will not establish the absolute or market worth of households in the sample, but does offer a framework for comparing households which have the same access to a given set of treatment options when faced with the same symptoms. Its application improves the possibility of understanding which resources, or combinations of resources, make most difference to a household's capacity to seek and get the treatment it has decided it needs. The paper is one element of a multi-layered and multi-disciplinary study of ‘The Informal Economy of Health in African Cities’. The overall project aims are (i) to map the cultural, infrastructural and clinical factors affecting the treatment-seeking behaviour of women in low-income urban areas; (ii) to compare their effect(s) on the management of symptoms of adult veneral infection (STD) and crisis symptoms in children under five. The project mapped the social context of illness management in a district of Kampala. Important dimensions of that context are: the infrastructure of the area, and the treatment options available in or around it; women's assessments of how good/kind/shameful/private/feasible/appropriate those options are, and the social and physical signs which trigger the conclusion that a symptom is ‘serious enough’ to need treatment outside the home in the first place. The focus here is the value of resources mobilized after the ‘serious enough’ assessment has been made. (For a wider picture, see Kampala Women Getting By. James Currey, London, 1996.

References (40)

  • P. Berman et al.

    The household production of health: integrating social science perspectives on micro-level health determinants

    Soc. Sci. Med.

    (1994)
  • S. Wallman and Associates

    Kampala Women Getting By: Wellbeing in the Time of AIDS

    (1996)
  • Comparison was necessary to test the hypothesis that the stigma of STD entails patterns of treatment seeking different...
  • The parish/township/RC2 area Kamwokya II in...
  • S. Wallman

    Sex and death: the AIDS crisis in social and cultural context

    J. AIDS

    (1988)
  • The ‘informal economy’ is also called the ‘second’, ‘black’ or ‘hidden’...
  • P. Harding et al.

    The Myth of the Hidden Economy

  • S. Wallman
  • J.I. Gershuny

    Social Innovation and the Division of Labour

    (1983)
  • Treatment Sources Survey

    (Oct–Nov. 1993)
  • S. Wallman

    Eight London Households

  • In this multi-disciplinary forum, it may be useful to note the qualitative:quantitative opposition does not have the...
  • Within economics, to invest is ‘to forego a resource in the immediate/short term to realize a return in the medium/long...
  • The assumption ceteris paribus, which commonly underlies economics’ models, of course refers to...
  • This score is the ratio of all members of the household over the number of earners among them—i.e. the Household...
  • M. Sahlins

    Stone Age Economics

    (1974)
  • R. Paine

    Anthropology beyond routine: cultural alternatives for the handling of the unexpected

    Int. J. Moral Soc. Stud.

    (1992)
  • F.G. Bailey

    Caste and the Economic Frontier

    (1957)
  • R. Firth

    Degrees of intelligibility

  • Cited by (25)

    • Narrative review of current context of malaria and management strategies in Uganda (Part I)

      2015, Acta Tropica
      Citation Excerpt :

      Among those who do access these facilities, they often do so when home or private sector treatments fail or when complications occur (Rutebemberwa et al., 2009a). Reasons for seeking care outside public facilities are several: geographical barriers such as distance, financial costs associated with travel and time away from work, demands of domestic life which makes timely access difficult, and general dissatisfaction with public facilities which include inconvenient hours, long wait times, inadequate staffing, poor quality of service, failure to adequately stock drugs, charging of unofficial fees in spite of user fee removal, and poor attitudes among health workers who reportedly become readily impatient when asked for clarifications (Amuge et al., 2004; Baume et al., 2000; Kemble et al., 2006; Kizito et al., 2012; Medicines for Malaria Venture, 2008; Nsungwa-Sabiiti et al., 2005; Nuwaha, 2002; Rutebemberwa et al., 2009b; Tanner and Vlassoff, 1998; Wallman and Baker, 1996; Winstanley et al., 2002, 2004; World Health Organization (WHO), 2004; Zurovac et al., 2005). Of those who do access care from public facilities, care is often substandard despite implementation of national malaria control protocols in the public sector (Bastiaens et al., 2014; Littrell et al., 2011).

    • Willingness to pay for public health services in rural Central Java, Indonesia: Methodological considerations when using the contingent valuation method

      2014, Social Science and Medicine
      Citation Excerpt :

      We believe that this is because we used debt to differentiate WTP from WTPpayable. Respondents set household priorities and changed their expenditure patterns according to the situation at hand, as most have potential resources such as land, livestock, and crops that could be converted into money (Russell, 1996; Wallman and Baker, 1996). In other words, they make discretional choices between selling assets and borrowing money.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text