What can information systems do for primary health care? An international perspective

https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(92)90281-TGet rights and content

Abstract

The reform of health information systems has been made a priority by health managers, public health specialists and technocrats. While each of these groups has promised major benefits from improvements in information systems, insufficient attention has been paid to the limitations placed upon the theoretical possibilities of information technology by the characteristics of the health system of which the information system is but a part. Managers anticipate improved efficiency and rational allocation of resources, but rational decision making does not automatically follow from improvements in information. Epidemiologists and public health specialists seek more effective and equitable health systems but methodological problems and the expense of many conventional epidemiological approaches continue to limit the usefulness of disease surveillence, programme monitoring and evaluation. Both managers and epidemiologists are confronted with the conflicts which arise in seeking to create locally sensitive information systems within centralised health systems. Technocrats see microcomputers as essential for information systems to be truly effective and as a means of liberating health workers from the drudgery of form filling. However, the rate of organisational evolution in the health system has not kept pace with the rapid development of information technology. There are good prospects for considerable health gain to be wrought from reforms in health information systems but to realise these it is necessary that this process be ‘action-led’ rather than, as is conventional, ‘data-led’. The latter approach sees data as the end in itself; the ‘action-led’ approach, in contrast, regards information as needs to interventions with a focus on how information will influence decisions. For improvements in information to result in improved health, strategies must be adopted which will ensure that information routinely informs decisions and is seen as a means to the end of improving health.

References (54)

  • W.E. Bertrand

    Information as a primary health care intervention: the impact of new technology on improving health for all

  • K. Chanawongse et al.

    From primary health care to basic minimum needs and quality of life: The challenge for MIS in Thailand

  • J.M. Robey et al.

    Information system development in support of national health programme monitoring and evaluation: The case of the Philippines

    Wld Hlth Statist. Q.

    (1990)
  • J. Jones

    Financial information in NHS ‘inadequate’

    The Independant

    (22 August, 1991)
  • J.N. Van Goor

    The realisation of the AIM programme

  • Anonymous. National Health Service, no date. The Child Health System: An...
  • D. Campos-Outcalt et al.

    For fuller utilization of health data

    Wld Hlth Forum

    (1988)
  • Anonymous

    Computers to monitor costs

    NHS Review: Your Guide to the Government's White Paper. GP

    (1989)
  • D. Light

    Learning from mistakes?

    Hlth Serv. J.

    (1990)
  • K. Lee et al.

    Policy-Making and Planning in the Health Sector

    (1982)
  • A. Mills

    Decentralisation concepts and issues: A review

  • R.L. Harris

    Centralization and decentralization in Latin America

  • P.G. Smith

    Evaluating interventions against tropical diseases

    Int. J. Epidem.

    (1987)
  • A.J. Hall et al.

    Tropical trials and tribulations

    Int. J. Epidemiol.

    (1990)
  • S. Greenland et al.

    On measures and models for the effectiveness of vaccines and vaccination programmes

    Int. J. Epidem.

    (1988)
  • G. Knox

    Case-control studies of screening procedures

    Publ. Hlth

    (1988)
  • IBRD

    Measurement of the Health Benefits of Investments in Water Supply: Report of an Expert Panel, Public Utilities Department Report PUN 20

    (1975)
  • Cited by (74)

    • Data value and care value in the practice of health systems: A case study in Uganda

      2018, Social Science and Medicine
      Citation Excerpt :

      These moments raise questions about the potential for objects such as the OPD register to facilitate practices that bridge data value and care value by attending to both simultaneously. HMIS comes with a commitment that its data will be of value across the health system (Sandiford et al., 1992). The realization of this is complicated by the fact that health systems do not have a single set of values.

    • Comparing a Conceptual Model of the Electronic Record System Applying in Home Health Care Unit

      2018, iEECON 2018 - 6th International Electrical Engineering Congress
    • Using health information for local action: Facilitating organisational change in South Africa

      2018, The Digital Challenge: Information Technology in the Development Context
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text