Original article
Misclassification by psychiatric screening questionnaires

https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9681(86)90123-2Get rights and content

Abstract

Two psychiatric screening instruments were applied to a sample of attenders (n = 875) in three primary medical care clinics in the city of Sao Paulo. The two questionnaires were validated in a subsample (n = 260) against the Clinical Interview Schedule [8].

The effect of sociodemographic variables on misclassification (by both questionnaires) was investigated using Relative Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis and linear logistic modelling. Both these techniques proved to be useful in this regard, and it is recommended that they be more widely used in screening studies.

Sex and educational level exerted important influences on misclassification. In general, men were more likely than women to be classified as false negative, while poorly educated respondents were more likely to be classified as false positive. These results are interpreted in an illness-behavior context.

References (43)

  • DD Dorfman et al.

    Maximum-likelihood estimation of parameters of signal-detection theory and determination of confidence intervals: rating-method data

    J Math Psychol

    (1969)
  • DP Goldberg
  • D Skuse et al.

    Screening for psychiatric disorder in general practice

    Psychol Med

    (1984)
  • D Mechanic

    Illness behaviour, social adaptation, and the management of illness

    J Nerv Ment Dis

    (1977)
  • DP Goldberg

    The Detection of Psychiatric Illness by Questionnaire

  • BW Vieweg et al.

    The General Health Questionnaire (GHQ): a comprehensive review

    J Oper Psychiatr

    (1983)
  • TW Harding et al.

    Mental disorders in primary health care: a study of their frequency and diagnosis in four developing countries

    Psychol Med

    (1980)
  • TW Harding et al.

    The WHO collaborative study on strategies for extending mental health care, II: the development of new research methods

    Am J Psychiatr

    (1983)
  • DP Goldberg et al.

    A Standardized Psychiatric Interview for use in community surveys

    Br J Soc Prev Med

    (1970)
  • J Mari et al.

    Minor psychiatric disorder in primary care in Brazil: a pilot study

    Psychol Med

    (1984)
  • C Campillo-Serrano et al.

    Confiabilidad entre clinicos utilizando la ‘Entrevista Psiquiátrica Estandardizada’ de Goldberg en una versión mexicana

    Acta Psiquiatr Psicol Am Lat

    (1981)
  • TA Cheng et al.

    Reliability study of the Clinical Interview Schedule (CIS) between British and Chinese psychiatrists

    Bull Chin Soc Neurol Psychiat

    (1982)
  • J Mari et al.

    Estudo preliminar da confiabilidade da Entrevista para Estudos Comunitários de Goldberg no Brasil

    Rev Ass Bras Psiq

    (1983)
  • Mari JJ, Blay SL, Iacoponi E: Um estudo de confiabilidade da versao brasileira da Clinical Interview Schedule. Bol of...
  • JJ Mari et al.

    A comparison of the validity of two psychiatric screening questionnaires (GHQ-12 and SRQ-20) in Brazil, using Relative Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis

    Psychol Med

    (1985)
  • JJ Mari et al.

    A validity study of a psychiatric screening questionnaire (SRQ-20) in the city of Sao Paulo

    Br J Psychiatr

    (1986)
  • JA Swets

    ROC analysis applied to the evaluation of medical imaging techniques

    Invest Radiol

    (1979)
  • JA Swets et al.

    Assessment of diagnostic technologies. Advanced measurement methods are illustrated in a study of computed tomography of the brain

    Science

    (1979)
  • LS Erdreich et al.

    Use of relative operating characteristic analysis in epidemiology

    Am J Psychiatr

    (1981)
  • JA Swets et al.

    Evaluation of Diagnostic Systems. Methods from Signal Detection Theory

    (1982)
  • CE Metz et al.

    ROCFIT

    (1984)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text