Abstract
Many theoretical frameworks seek to describe the dynamic process of the implementation of innovations. Little is known, however, about factors related to decisions to adopt innovations and how the likelihood of adoption of innovations can be increased. Using a narrative synthesis approach, this paper compared constructs theorized to be related to adoption of innovations proposed in existing theoretical frameworks in order to identify characteristics likely to increase adoption of innovations. The overall goal was to identify elements across adoption frameworks that are potentially modifiable and, thus, might be employed to improve the adoption of evidence-based practices. The review identified 20 theoretical frameworks that could be grouped into two broad categories: theories that mainly address the adoption process (N = 10) and theories that address adoption within the context of implementation, diffusion, dissemination, and/or sustainability (N = 10). Constructs of leadership, operational size and structure, innovation fit with norms and values, and attitudes/motivation toward innovations each are mentioned in at least half of the theories, though there were no consistent definitions of measures for these constructs. A lack of precise definitions and measurement of constructs suggests further work is needed to increase our understanding of adoption of innovations.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aarons, G. A., Hurlburt, M., & Horwitz, S. (2011). Advancing a conceptual model of evidence-based practice implementation in public service sectors. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 38(1), 4–23. doi:10.1007/s10488-010-0327-7.
Aarons, G. A., Wells, R. S., Zagursky, K., Fettes, D. L., & Palinkas, L. A. (2009). Implementing evidence-based practice in community mental health agencies: A multiple stakeholder analysis. American Journal of Public Health, 99(11), 2087–2095. doi:10.2105/ajph.2009.161711.
Backer, T. E., Liberman, R. P., & Kuehnel, T. G. (1986). Dissemination and adoption of innovative psychosocial interventions. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 54(1), 111–118.
Berta, W., Teare, G. F., Gilbart, E., Ginsburg, L. S., Lemieux-Charles, L., Davis, D., et al. (2005). The contingencies of organizational learning in long-term care: Factors that affect innovation adoption. Health Care Management Review, 30(4), 282–292.
Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128–152.
Damanpour, F., & Schneider, M. (2006). Phases of the adoption of innovation in organizations: Effects of environment, organization and top managers. British Journal of Management, 17(3), 215–236. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8551.2006.00498.x.
Damanpour, F., & Schneider, M. (2009). Characteristics of innovation and innovation adoption in public organizations: Assessing the role of managers. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 19(3), 495–522. doi:10.1093/jopart/mun021.
Feldstein, A. C., & Glasgow, R. E. (2008). A practical, robust implementation and sustainability model (PRISM) for integrating research findings into practice. Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety, 34(4), 228–243.
Fixsen, D. L., Naoom, S. F., Blase, K. A., Friedman, R. M., & Wallace, F. (2005). Implementation research: A synthesis of the literature. Tampa: University of South Florida, Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health Institute, The National Implementation Research Network.
Frambach, R. T., & Schillewaert, N. (2002). Organizational innovation adoption: A multi-level framework of determinants and opportunities for future research. Journal of Business Research, 55(2), 163–176.
Gallivan, M. J. (2001). Organizational adoption and assimilation of complex technological innovations: Development and application of a new framework. DATA BASE for Advances in Information Systems, 32(3), 51–85. doi:10.1145/506724.506729.
Garland, A., Bickman, L., & Chorpita, B. (2010). Change what? Identifying quality improvement targets by investigating usual mental health care. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 37(1), 15–26. doi:10.1007/s10488-010-0279-y.
Glasgow, R. E. (2003). Translating Research to Practice. Diabetes Care, 26(8), 2451–2456. doi:10.2337/diacare.26.8.2451.
Glasgow, R. E., Lichtenstein, E., & Marcus, A. C. (2003). Why don’t we see more translation of health promotion research to practice? Rethinking the efficacy-to-effectiveness transition. American Journal of Public Health, 93(8), 1261–1267.
Godin, G., Belanger-Gravel, A., Eccles, M., & Grimshaw, J. (2008). Healthcare professionals’ intentions and behaviours: A systematic review of studies based on social cognitive theories. Implementation Science, 3(1), 36–48. doi:10.1186/1748-5908-3-36.
Graham, I. D., & Logan, J. (2004). Innovations in knowledge transfer and continuity of care. The Canadian Journal of Nursing Research, 36(2), 89–103.
Greenhalgh, T., Robert, G., Macfarlane, F., Bate, P., & Kyriakidou, O. (2004). Diffusion of innovations in service organizations: Systematic review and recommendations. Milbank Quarterly, 82(4), 581–629.
Horwitz, S. M., Chamberlain, P., Landsverk, J., & Mullican, C. (2010). Improving the Mental Health of Children in Child Welfare Through the Implementation of Evidence-Based Parenting Interventions. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 37(1–2), 27–39. doi:10.1007/s10488-010-0274-3.
Jagosh, J., Salsberg, P. P., Macaulay, A. C., & Bush, P. L. (2011). Realist Review: An Introduction. Paper presented at the Canadian Public Health Association (CPHA) Meetings, Montreal, Canada.
Klein, K. J., & Sorra, J. S. (1996). The challenge of innovation implementation. Academy of Management Review, 21(4), 1055–1080.
Mendel, P., Meredith, L., Schoenbaum, M., Sherbourne, C., & Wells, K. (2008). Interventions in organizational and community context: A framework for building evidence on dissemination and implementation in health services research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 35(1), 21–37. doi:10.1007/s10488-007-0144-9.
Meyer, A. D., & Goes, J. B. (1988). Organizational assimilation of innovations: A multilevel contextual analysis. Academy of Management Journal, 31(4), 897–923.
Mitchell, S. A., Fisher, C. A., Hastings, C. E., Silverman, L. B., & Wallen, G. R. (2010). A thematic analysis of theoretical models for translational science in nursing: Mapping the field. Nursing Outlook, 58(6), 287–300. doi:10.1016/j.outlook.2010.07.001.
Oldenburg, B., & Glanz, K. (2008). Diffusion of innovations. In K. Glanz, B. K. Rimer, & K. Viswanath (Eds.), Health behavior and health education (4th ed., pp. 313–333). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Panzano, P. C., & Roth, D. (2006). The decision to adopt evidence-based and other innovative mental health practices: Risky business? Psychiatric Services, 57(8), 1153–1161. doi:10.1176/appi.ps.57.8.1153.
Pawson, R., Greenhalgh, T., Harvey, G., & Walshe, K. (2005). Realist review: A new method of systematic review designed for complex policy interventions. Journal of Health Services Research and Policy, 10(Suppl 1), 21–34. doi:10.1258/1355819054308530.
Popay, J., Roberts, H., Sowden, A., Petticrew, M., Arai, L., Rodgers, M., et al. (2006). Guidance on the conduct of narrative synthesis in systematic reviews: A product from the ESRC methods programme. Retrieved from http://www.lancs.ac.uk/shm/research/nssr/research/dissemination/publications.php.
Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). New York: Free Press.
Simpson, D. D. (2002). A conceptual framework for transferring research to practice. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 22(4), 171–182.
Solomons, N. M., & Spross, J. A. (2011). Evidence-based practice barriers and facilitators from a continuous quality improvement perspective: An integrative review. Journal of Nursing Management, 19(1), 109–120. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2834.2010.01144.x.
Sox, H. C. (2010). Comparative effectiveness research: A progress report. Annals of Internal Medicine, 153(7), 469–472.
Stetler, C. B. (2001). Updating the Stetler Model of research utilization to facilitate evidence-based practice. Nursing Outlook, 49(6), 272–279. doi:10.1067/mno.2001.120517.
Tabak, R. G., Khoong, E. C., Chambers, D. A., & Brownson, R. C. (2012a). Bridging research and practice: Models for dissemination and implementation research. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 43(3), 337–350. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2012.05.024.
Tabak, R. G., Khooong, E. C., Chambers, D., & Brownson, R. C. (2012). A Narrative Review and Synthesis of Frameworks in Dissemination and Implementation Research. Paper presented at the 5th Annual NIH Conference on the Science of Dissemination and Implementation: Research at the Crossroads, Bethesda, MD.
Valente, T. W. (1996). Social network thresholds in the diffusion of innovations. Social Networks, 18(1), 69–89. doi:10.1016/0378-8733(95)00256-1.
Weinstein, N. D., Sandman, P. M., & Blalock, S. J. (2008). The precaution adoption process model. In K. Glanz, B. K. Rimer, & K. Viswanath (Eds.), Health behavior and health education (4th ed., pp. 123–147). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Wong, G., Greenhalgh, T., & Pawson, R. (2010). Internet-based medical education: A realist review of what works, for whom and in what circumstances. BMC Medical Education, 10(1), 12.
Acknowledgments
This manuscript was created with support from the National Institute on Mental Health (P30 MH090322, PI: Hoagwood). Dr. Wisdom’s work on this manuscript was conducted while she was at Columbia University.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix 1
Appendix 1
Databases and Search Strategy
Ovid Medline, PsycInfo, and Web of Science were the major electronic databases used for Medical Subject Heading (MeSH) and article keyword searches.
-
1.
Ovid Medline provided the first and primary source of literature. First, exploratory searches were conducted using these individual MeSH terms:
-
Diffusion of innovation (13,774 hits);
-
Evidence-based practice (51,940 hits);
-
Evidence-based medicine (47,305 hits) a subset of evidence-based practice;
-
Models, theoretical (1,120,350 hits).
-
Next, guided by the goal of this review, the following MeSH terms were combined with the and Boolean operator:
-
Diffusion of innovation and evidence-based practice (1,781 hits); diffusion of innovation and models, theoretical (1,299 hits);
-
Diffusion of innovation and evidence-based practice (1,397 hits).
Considering theoretical frameworks are the focus of this review, further combinations of the following MeSH terms were conducted using the and Boolean operator:
-
Diffusion of innovation and evidence-based practice and models, theoretical (320 hits);
-
Diffusion of innovation and evidence-based medicine and models, theoretical (237 hits).
Since evidence-based medicine is a subset of evidence-based practice in the MeSH grouping, the search narrowed down to diffusion of innovation and evidence-based practice and models, theoretical.
-
2.
We used PsycInfo to supplement the original pool of literature using a similar search logic of MeSH:
-
Adoption (15,535 hits);
-
Evidence based practice (8,940 hits);
-
Innovation (3,995 hits);
-
Models (65,923 hits);
-
Theories (91,148 hits).
-
Since adoption as a MeSH in PsycInfo is quite broad and often refers to the child welfare taxonomy, we used the and Boolean operator for the following combinations:
-
Adoption and evidence based practice (291 hits);
-
Adoption and innovation (339 hits).
Next, to add a theoretical focus to this pool, we used the and Boolean operator for the following combinations:
-
Adoption and evidence based practice and innovation (10 hits);
-
Adoption and evidence based practice and models (11 hits);
-
Adoption and evidence based practice and theories (9 hits);
-
Adoption and innovation and models (18 hits);
-
Adoption and innovation and theories (6 hits).
All articles from these last searches in PsycInfo were screened for overlaps.
-
3.
To gain a broader perspective on other fields, we used Web of Science to expand the pool of literature obtained from Ovid Medline and PsycInfo, using the following topic searches:
-
Adoption (45,440 hits);
-
Diffusion (425,401 hits);
-
Evidence-base (47,294 hits);
-
Innovation (76,818 hits);
-
Model (3,894,846 hits);
-
Theory (1,172,347).
-
Given these large yields, we used the and Boolean operator to combine the following topic searches:
-
Adoption and evidence-base (899 hits);
-
Adoption and innovation (4,209 hits);
-
Adoption and diffusion (3,059 hits);
-
Adoption and evidence-base and innovation (135 hits).
To narrow the focus on theoretical models, further search combinations were produced using the and Boolean operator:
-
Adoption and innovation and model (48 hits);
-
Adoption and innovation and theory (194 hits);
-
Adoption and evidence-base and model (23 hits);
-
Adoption and evidence-base and theory (80 hits);
-
Adoption and innovation and model and theory (439 hits);
-
Adoption and evidence-base and model and theory (42 hits);
The last step searches from these three databases formed the preliminary pool of literature. All articles were searched for overlaps within and between databases, which yielded 332 unique hits. To systematically zero into specific adoption theories, we screened article keywords so at least one of the following keywords were included:
-
Adoption;
-
Adoption of innovation;
-
Conceptual model;
-
Diffusion;
-
Evidence-based interventions;
-
Evidence-based practice;
-
Framework;
-
Innovation;
-
Theory.
In addition, article titles were screened so that at least one of the following words were included:
-
Adoption;
-
Diffusion;
-
Diffusion of innovation;
-
Diffusion of innovations;
-
Evidence-based interventions;
-
Evidence-based mental health treatments;
-
Evidence-based practice;
-
Framework;
-
Innovation;
-
Innovation adoption;
-
Model;
-
Multilevel;
-
Research-based practice;
-
Theoretical models.
Finally, we screened the actual titles of the adoption theories within the texts of the articles so that at least one the following words were included:
-
Adoption;
-
Diffusion;
-
Evidence-based;
-
Evidence-based practice;
-
Framework;
-
Innovation;
-
Model.
Appendix 2
See Table 3.
Appendix 3
See Table 4.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wisdom, J.P., Chor, K.H.B., Hoagwood, K.E. et al. Innovation Adoption: A Review of Theories and Constructs. Adm Policy Ment Health 41, 480–502 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-013-0486-4
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-013-0486-4