Abstract
As community-level interventions become more common in HIV prevention, processes such as community mobilization (CM) are increasingly utilized in public health programs and research. Project Accept, a multi-site community randomized controlled trial, is testing the hypothesis that CM coupled with community-based mobile voluntary counseling and testing and post-test support services will alter community norms and reduce the incidence of HIV. By using a multiple-case study approach, this qualitative study identifies seven major community mobilization strategies used in Project Accept, including stakeholder buy-in, formation of community coalitions, community engagement, community participation, raising community awareness, involvement of leaders, and partnership building, and describes three key elements of mobilization success.
Resumen
Debido a que las intervenciones a nivel de la comunidad llegan a ser más comunes en la prevención de VIH, los procesos como la Movilización Comunitaria (MC) están cada vez siendo más utilizados en programas en salud pública e investigaciones. Project Accept, un ensayo multi-sitio, aleatorio controlado, está probando la hipótesis de que MC junto con el asesoramiento y análisis voluntario ambulante de base comunitaria y los servicios de apoyo después del análisis, modificaran las normas comunitarias y reducirán la incidencia de VIH. Usando el enfoque de múltiples casos, este estudio cualitativo identifica siete estrategias importantes para movilizar la comunidad utilizadas en Project Accept, incluyendo la aceptación de parte de los actores claves, la formación de coaliciones comunitarias, integración de la comunidad, participación comunitaria, incremento de la conciencia comunitaria, involucramiento de los lideres, fortalecimiento de las asociaciones, y describiendo los tres elementos claves del éxito de dicha movilización.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Parker RG. Empowerment, community mobilization and social change in the face of HIV/AIDS. AIDS (London, England). 1996;10(Suppl 3):S27–31.
Darrow WW, Montanea JE, Fernandez PB, Zucker UF, Stephens DP, Gladwin H. Eliminating disparities in HIV disease: community mobilization to prevent HIV transmission among Black and Hispanic young adults in Broward County, Florida. Ethn Dis. 2004;14(3 Suppl 1):S108–16.
King W, Nu’Man J, Fuller TR, Brown M, Smith S, Howell AV, et al. The diffusion of a community-level HIV intervention for women: lessons learned and best practices. JWomens Health(Larchmt). 2008;17(7):1055–66.
Person B, Cotton D. A model of community mobilization for the prevention of HIV in women and infants. Prevention of HIV in Women and Infants Demonstration Projects. Public Health Rep. 1996;111(Suppl 1):89–98.
Ramos RL, Hernandez A, Ferreira-Pinto JB, Ortiz M, Somerville GG. Promovision: designing a capacity-building program to strengthen and expand the role of promotores in HIV prevention. Health Promot Pract. 2006;7(4):444–9.
Ziff MA, Harper GW, Chutuape KS, Deeds BG, Futterman D, Francisco VT, et al. Laying the foundation for Connect to Protect: a multi-site community mobilization intervention to reduce HIV/AIDS incidence and prevalence among urban youth. J Urban Health. 2006;83(3):506–22.
Apinundecha C, Laohasiriwong W, Cameron MP, Lim S. A community participation intervention to reduce HIV/AIDS stigma, Nakhon Ratchasima province, northeast Thailand. AIDS Care. 2007;19(9):1157–65.
Williams B, Campbell C. Community mobilization as an HIV prevention strategy: challenges and obstacles (South Africa). Sex Health Exch. 1999;2:4–6.
Jana S, Basu I, Rotheram-Borus MJ, Newman PA. The Sonagachi Project: a sustainable community intervention program. AIDS Educ Prev. 2004;16(5):405–14.
Kerrigan D, Telles P, Torres H, Overs C, Castle C. Community development and HIV/STI-related vulnerability among female sex workers in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Health Educ Res. 2008;23(1):137–45.
Ramesh BM, Beattie TSH, Shajy I, Washington R, Jagannathan L, Reza-Paul S, et al. Changes in risk behaviours and prevalence of sexually transmitted infections following HIV preventive interventions among female sex workers in five districts in Karnataka state, south India. Sex Transm Infect. 2010;86(Suppl 1):i17–24.
Reza-Paul S, Beattie T, Syed HUR, Venukumar KT, Venugopal MS, Fathima MP, et al. Declines in risk behaviour and sexually transmitted infection prevalence following a community-led HIV preventive intervention among female sex workers in Mysore, India. AIDS. 2008;22(Suppl 5):S91–100.
Khumalo-Sakutukwa G, Morin SF, Fritz K, Charlebois ED, van Rooyen H, Chingono A, et al. Project Accept (HPTN 043): a community-based intervention to reduce HIV incidence in populations at risk for HIV in sub-Saharan Africa and Thailand. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2008;49(4):422–31.
Denison JA, O’Reilly KR, Schmid GP, Kennedy CE, Sweat MD. HIV voluntary counseling and testing and behavioral risk reduction in developing countries: a meta-analysis, 1990–2005. AIDS Behav. 2008;12(3):363–73.
World Health Organization. Community Mobilization and HIV Counseling and Testing. World Health Organization; 2010. http://www.who.int/hiv/topics/vct/toolkit/components/community/en/index.html. Accessed 22 Feb 2010.
Rogers EM. Diffusion of innovations. New York: Free Press; 1995.
Coates TJ, Richter L, Caceres C. Behavioural strategies to reduce HIV transmission: how to make them work better. Lancet. 2008;372(9639):669–84.
Sweat MD, Denison JA. Reducing HIV incidence in developing countries with structural and environmental interventions. AIDS. 1995;9(Suppl A):S251–7.
Yin RK. Case study research: design and methods. 4th ed. Los Angeles: Sage Publications; 2009.
Stake RE. The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 1995.
Lincoln YS, Guba EG. Naturalistic inquiry. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 1985.
Altman DG. Sustaining interventions in community systems: on the relationship between researchers and communities. Health Psychol. 1995;14(6):526–36.
Cornish F, Ghosh R. The necessary contradictions of ‘community-led’ health promotion: a case study of HIV prevention in an Indian red light district. Soc Sci Med. 2007;64(2):496–507.
McHunu GG. The levels of community involvement in health (CIH): a case of rural and urban communities in Kwazulu-Natal. Curationis. 2009;32(1):4–13.
Nhamo M, Campbell C, Gregson S. Obstacles to local-level AIDS competence in rural Zimbabwe: putting HIV prevention in context. AIDS Care. 2010;22(Suppl 2):1662–9.
Beeker C, Guenther-Grey C, Raj A. Community empowerment paradigm drift and the primary prevention of HIV/AIDS. Soc Sci Med. 1998;46(7):831–42.
Campbell C, Cornish F. Towards a “fourth generation” of approaches to HIV/AIDS management: creating contexts for effective community mobilisation. AIDS Care. 2010;22(Suppl 2):1569–79.
Narayan D, Cassidy MF. A dimensional approach to measuring social capital: development and validation of a social capital inventory. Curr Sociol. 2001;49(2):59–102.
Draper AK, Hewitt G, Rifkin S. Chasing the dragon: developing indicators for the assessment of community participation in health programmes. Soc Sci Med. 2010;71(6):1102–9.
Newman PA. Towards a science of community engagement. Lancet. 2006;367(9507):302.
Sweat M, Morin S, Celentano D, Mulawa M, Singh B, Mbwambo J, et al. Community-based intervention to increase HIV testing and case detection in people aged 16–32 years in Tanzania, Zimbabwe, and Thailand (NIMH Project Accept, HPTN 043): a randomised study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2011;11(7):525–32.
Spire B, de Zoysa I, Himmich H. HIV prevention: what have we learned from community experiences in concentrated epidemics? J Int AIDS Soc. 2008;11(1):5.
Nakibinge S, Maher D, Katende J, Kamali A, Grosskurth H, Seeley J. Community engagement in health research: two decades of experience from a research project on HIV in rural Uganda. Tropical Medicine & International Health: TM & IH. 2009;14(2):190–5.
Tindana PO, Singh JA, Tracy CS, Upshur RE, Daar AS, Singer PA, et al. Grand challenges in global health: community engagement in research in developing countries. PLoS Med. 2007;4(9):e273.
Campbell C, Foulis CA, Maimane S, Sibiya Z. The impact of social environments on the effectiveness of youth HIV prevention: a South African case study. AIDS Care. 2005;17(4):471–8.
Acknowledgments
Project Accept was sponsored by the US National Institute of Mental Health as a cooperative agreement through contracts U01MH066687 and U01MH066688 (Johns Hopkins University), U01MH066701 (University of California) and U01MH066702 (University of California, San Francisco). In addition, this work was sponsored by the HIV Prevention Trials Network (HPTN Protocol 043) of the Division of AIDS of the US National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and by the Office of AIDS Research of the US National Institute of Health. Views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the sponsoring agencies. We thank the communities that partnered with us in conducting this research and all study participants for their contributions. We also thank the study staff and volunteers for their work and dedication.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tedrow, V.A., Zelaya, C.E., Kennedy, C.E. et al. No “Magic Bullet”: Exploring Community Mobilization Strategies Used in a Multi-site Community Based Randomized Controlled Trial: Project Accept (HPTN 043). AIDS Behav 16, 1217–1226 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-011-0009-9
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-011-0009-9