Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Acceptability of a Microenterprise Intervention Among Female Sex Workers in Chennai, India

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
AIDS and Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Female sex workers have been central in India’s HIV epidemic since it was first diagnosed among them in 1989. Female sex workers’ risk of HIV is primarily economically motivated. The Pi pilot study examined the feasibility and association of a microenterprise intervention, the tailoring of canvas bags, on sexual risk behaviors among female sex workers (N = 100) in Chennai. Women were randomized to an intervention or control arm. Between-group comparisons at baseline and at six-month follow-up were performed. Multivariate linear regression with bootstrapping was conducted to estimate the intervention effect. At baseline, women were a median of 35 years old, 61% were married and they had an average of two children. Intervention participants reported a significantly lower number of sex partners and significant increases in income at the 6-month follow-up compared to control participants. In a multivariate model, intervention participants had a significantly lower number of paying clients per month at follow-up compared to control participants. By graduation, 75% of intervention arm participants had made at least one sellable canvas bag and 6 months after the study’s end, 60% have continued involvement in bag production. The pilot study demonstrated that microenterprise interventions are successful in both providing FSWs with licit income opportunities and was associated with reductions in HIV risk behaviors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Organization NAC. HIV/AIDS: facts and figures. Available at: www.nacoonline.org. Accessed 30 Jan 2007.

  2. Venkataramana C, Sarada P. Extent and speed of spread of HIV infection in India through the commercial sex networks: a perspective. Trop Med Int Health. 2001;6(12):1040–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Radhika Brahme M, Mehta S, Sahay S, et al. Correlates and trend of HIV prevalence among female sex workers attending sexually transmitted disease clinics in Pune, India (1993–2002). J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2006;41(1):107–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Chandrasekaran P, Dallabetta G, Loo V, Rao S, Gayle H, Alexander A. Containing HIV/AIDS in India: the unfinished agenda. Lancet Inf Dis. 2006;6(8):508–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Nagelkerke N, Jha P, Vlas S, et al. Modelling HIV/AIDS epidemics in Botswana and India: impact of interventions to prevent transmission. Bull WHO. 2002;80(2):89–96.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kim J, Watts C, Hargreaves J, et al. Understanding the impact of a microfinance-based intervention on women’s empowerment and the reduction of intimate partner violence in South Africa. Am J Public Health. 2007;97(10):1794–802.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Klein C, Easton D, Parker R, O’Leary A. Structural barriers and facilitators in HIV prevention: a review of international research. In: Beyond condoms: alternate approaches to HIV prevention. New York: Kluwer Academic Plenum Publishers; 2002: p. 14–46.

  8. Farmer P, Connors M, Simons J. Women, poverty and AIDS: sex drugs and structural violence. Monroe, ME: Common Courage Press; 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dworkin S, Blankenship K. Microfinance and HIV/AIDS prevention: assessing its promise and limitations. AIDS Behav. 2009;13(3):462–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Greig F, Koopman C. Multilevel analysis of women’s empowerment and HIV prevention: quantitative survey results from a preliminary study in Botswana. AIDS Behav. 2003;7(2):195–208.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Sanders-Phillips K. Factors influencing HIV/AIDS in women of color. Public Health Rep. 2002;117(Suppl 1):S151–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Maman S, Mbwambo J, Hogan N, et al. HIV-positive women report more lifetime partner violence: findings from a voluntary counseling and testing clinic in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. Am J Public Health. 2002;92(8):1331–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Exner T, Hoffman S, Dworkin S, Ehrhardt A. Beyond the male condom: the evolution of gender-specific HIV interventions for women. Annu Rev Sex Res. 2003;14:114–36.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Blankenship K, Bray S, Merson M. Structural interventions in public health. AIDS. 2000;14(Supp 1):S11–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Sumartojo E. Structural factors in HIV prevention: concepts, examples, and implications for research. AIDS. 2000;14(Supp 1):S3–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Buzdugan R, Halli SS, Cowan FM. The female sex work typology in India in the context of HIV/AIDS. Trop Med Int Health. 2009;14(6):673–87.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kumar S. A rapid situation assessment of sexual risk behavior and substance use among sex workers and their clients in Chennai (Madras), South India. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2003.

  18. Blankenship K, Friedman S, Dworkin S, Mantell J. Structural interventions: concepts, challenges and opportunities for research. J Urban Health. 2006;83(1):59–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Coates T, Richter L, Caceres C. Behavioural strategies to reduce HIV transmission: how to make them work better. Lancet. 2008;372(9639):669–84.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Gupta G, Parkhurst J, Ogden J, Aggleton P, Mahal A. Structural approaches to HIV prevention. Lancet. 2008;372(9640):764–75.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Shahmanesh M, Patel V, Mabey D, Cowan F. Effectiveness of interventions for the prevention of HIV and other sexually transmitted infections in female sex workers in resource poor setting: a systematic review. Trop Med Int Health. 2008;13(5):659–79.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Hanenberg R, Sokal D, Rojanapithayakorn W, Kunasol P. Impact of Thailand’s HIV-control programme as indicated by the decline of sexually transmitted diseases. Lancet. 1994;344(8917):243–5.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Rojanapithayakorn W, Hanenberg R. The 100% condom program in Thailand. AIDS. 1996;10(1):1–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Basu I, Jana S, Rotheram-Borus M, et al. HIV prevention among sex workers in India. JAIDS. 2004;36(3):845–52.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Stratford D, Mizuno Y, Williams K, Courtenay-Quirk C, O’Leary A. Addressing poverty as risk for disease: recommendations from CDC’s consultation on microenterprise as HIV prevention. Public Health Rep. 2008;123(1):9–20.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Hashemi S, Schuler S, Riley A. Rural credit programs and women’s empowerment in Bangladesh. World Dev. 1996;24(4):635–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Schuler S, Hashemi S, Riley A. The influence of women’s changing roles and status in Bangladesh’s fertility transition: evidence from a study of credit programs and contraceptive use. World Dev. 1997;25(4):563–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Pronyk P, Hargreaves J, Kim J, et al. Effect of a structural intervention for the prevention of intimate-partner violence and HIV in rural South Africa: a cluster randomised trial. Lancet. 2006;368(9551):1973–83.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Sherman S, German D, Cheng Y, Marks M, Bailey-Kloche M. The evaluation of the JEWEL project: an innovative economic enhancement and HIV prevention intervention study targeting drug using women involved in prostitution. AIDS Care. 2006;18(1):1–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. NIMH Collaborative HIV/STD Prevention Trial Group. Sexually transmitted disease and HIV prevalence and risk factors in concentrated and generalized HIV epidemic settings. AIDS. 2007;21(Suppl 2):S81–90.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Sherman SG, Sutcliffe C, Srirojn B, Latkin CA, Aramratanna A, Celentano DD. Evaluation of a peer network intervention trial among young methamphetamine users in Chiang Mai, Thailand. Soc Sci Med. 2009;68(1):69–79.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Latkin CA, Sherman SG, Knowlton A. HIV prevention among drug users: outcome of a network-oriented peer outreach intervention. Health Psychol. 2003;22(4):332–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Efron BRT. Bootstrap methods for standard errors, confidence intervals, and other measures of statistical accuracy. Stat Sci. 1986;1(1):54–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Chandrasekaran P, Dallabetta G, Loo V, et al. Evaluation design for large-scale HIV prevention programmes: the case of Avahan, the India AIDS initiative. AIDS. 2008;22(Suppl 5):S1–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank all of the women who participated in the study as well as the research staff. This research was support by NIMH grant U10MH061543.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Susan G. Sherman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sherman, S.G., Srikrishnan, A.K., Rivett, K.A. et al. Acceptability of a Microenterprise Intervention Among Female Sex Workers in Chennai, India. AIDS Behav 14, 649–657 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-010-9686-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-010-9686-z

Keywords

Navigation