Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Updating and prospective validation of a prognostic model for high sickness absence

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

To further develop and validate a Dutch prognostic model for high sickness absence (SA).

Methods

Three-wave longitudinal cohort study of 2,059 Norwegian nurses. The Dutch prognostic model was used to predict high SA among Norwegian nurses at wave 2. Subsequently, the model was updated by adding person-related (age, gender, marital status, children at home, and coping strategies), health-related (BMI, physical activity, smoking, and caffeine and alcohol intake), and work-related (job satisfaction, job demands, decision latitude, social support at work, and both work-to-family and family-to-work spillover) variables. The updated model was then prospectively validated for predictions at wave 3.

Results

1,557 (77 %) nurses had complete data at wave 2 and 1,342 (65 %) at wave 3. The risk of high SA was under-estimated by the Dutch model, but discrimination between high-risk and low-risk nurses was fair after re-calibration to the Norwegian data. Gender, marital status, BMI, physical activity, smoking, alcohol intake, job satisfaction, job demands, decision latitude, support at the workplace, and work-to-family spillover were identified as potential predictors of high SA. However, these predictors did not improve the model’s discriminative ability, which remained fair at wave 3.

Conclusions

The prognostic model correctly identifies 73 % of Norwegian nurses at risk of high SA, although additional predictors are needed before the model can be used to screen working populations for risk of high SA.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allebeck P, Mastekaasa A (2004) Swedish Council on Technology Assessment in Healthcare (SBU) Chapter 5. Risk factors for sick leave—general studies. Scand J Public Health 63:49–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowling A (2005) Just one question: if one question works, why ask several? J Epidemiol Community Health 59:342–345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brayfield AH, Rothe HF, Lester PE, Bishop LK (2001) Handbook of tests and measurement in education and the social sciences, 2nd edn. Technomic Publishing, Lancaster, pp 143–144

    Google Scholar 

  • Bush K, Kivlahan DR, McDonell MB, Fihn SD, Bradley KA (1998) The AUDIT alcohol consumption questions (AUDIT-C): an effective brief screening test for problem drinking. Arch Int Med 158:1789–1795

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen KB, Lund T, Labriola M, Bültmann U, Villadsen E (2007) The impact of health behaviour on long-term sickness absence: results from DWECS/DREAM. Ind Health 45:348–351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook NR, Paynter NP (2011) Performance of reclassification statistics in comparing risk prediction models. Biom J 53:237–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davey MM, Cummings G, Newburn-Cook CV, Lo EA (2009) Predictors of nurse absenteeism in hopsitals: a systematic review. J Nurs Manag 17:313–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Lange AH, Taris TW, Kompier MAJ, Houtman ILD, Bongers P (2003) The very best of the millennium: longitudinal research and the demand-control-(support) model. J Occup Health Psychol 8:282–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duijts SFA, Kant I, Swaen GHM, van den Brandt PA, Zeegers MPA (2007) A meta-analysis of observational studies identifies predictors of sickness absence. J Clin Epidemiol 60:1105–1115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eriksen HR, Olff M, Ursin H (1997) The CODE: a revised battery for coping and defense and its relations to subjective health. Scand J Psychol 38:175–182

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Eriksson I, Undén AL, Elofsson S (2001) Self-rated health. Comparisons between three different measures. Results from a population study. Int J Epidemiol 30:326–333

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Etter JF, Perneger TV (1997) Analysis of non-response bias in a mailed health survey. J Clin Epidemiol 50:1123–1128

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fad J, Upadhye S, Worster A (2006) Understanding receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. CJEM 8:19–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrie JE, Kivimäki M, Head J, Shipley MJ, Vahtera J, Marmot MG (2005) A comparison of self-reported sickness absence with absences recorded in employers’ registers: evidence from the Whitehall II study. Occup Environ Med 62:74–79

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrie JE, Vahtera J, Kivimäki M, Westerlund H, Melchior M, Alexanderson K et al (2009) Diagnosis-specific sickness absence and all-cause mortality in the GAZEL study. J Epidemiol Community Health 63:50–55

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher RJ, Katz JE (2000) Social-desirability bias and the validity of self-reported values. Psychol Mark 17:105–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gjesdal S, Ringdal PR, Haug K, Maeland JG, Vollset SE, Alexanderson K (2008) Mortality after long-term sickness absence: prospective cohort study. Eur J Public Health 18:517–521

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grøvle L, Haugen AJ, Keller A, Natvig B, Brox JI, Grotle M (2012) Poor agreement found between self-report and a public registry on duration of sickness absence. J Clin Epidemiol 65:212–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrell FE (2013) Regression modeling strategies. http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/rms. Accessed 1 September 2013

  • Häusser JA, Mojzisch A, Niesel M, Schultz-Hardt S (2010) Ten years on: a review of recent research on the job demand–control (-support) model and psychological well-being. Work Stress 24:1–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Head J, Ferrie JE, Alexanderson K, Westerlund H, Vahtera J, Kivimäki M (2008) Diagnosis-specific sickness absence as predictor of mortality: the Whitehal II prospective cohort study. BMJ 337:a1469

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson M, Glozier N, Holland Elliot K (2005) Long term sickness absence. BMJ 330:802–803

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Idler EL, Benyamini Y (1997) Self-rated health and mortality: a review of twenty-seven community studies. J Health Soc Behav 38:21–37

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Johansson G, Lundberg I (2004) Adjustment latitude and attendance requirements as determinants of sickness absence or attendance: empirical tests of the illness flexibility model. Soc Sci Med 58:1857–1868

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Justice AC, Covinsky KE, Belin JA (1999) Assessing the generalizability of prognostic information. Ann Intern Med 130:515–524

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kinnunen U, Feldt T, Geurts S, Pulkkinen L (2006) Types of work-family interface: well-being correlates of negative and positive spillover between work and family. Scand J Psychol 47:149–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kurtze N, Rangul V, Hustvedt BE, Flanders WD (2007) Reliability and validity of self-reported physical activity in the Nord-Trondelag Health Study (HUNT 2). Eur J Epidemiol 22:379–387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laaksonen M, Piha K, Martikainen P, Rahkonen O, Lahelma E (2009) Health-related behaviours and sickness absence from work. Occup Environ Med 66:840–847

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Labriola M (2008) Conceptual framework of sickness absence and return to work, focusing on both the individual and contextual level. Work 30:377–387

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee KI, Koval JJ (1997) Determinants of the best significance level in forward stepwise logistic regression. Commun Stat Simul Comput 26:559–575

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lund T, Kivimäki M, Labriola M, Villadsen E, Christensen KB (2008) Using administrative sickness absence data as a marker of future disability pension: the prospective DREAM study of Danish private sector employees. Occup Environ Med 65:28–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2011) Society at a glance 2011: OECD social indicators. OECD Publishing, Paris. doi:10.1787/soc_glance-2011-en. Accessed 10 January 2014

  • Pencina MJ, d’Agostinho RB Sr, d’Agostinho RB Jr, Vasan RS (2008) Evaluating the added predictive ability of a new marker: from area under the ROC curve to reclassification and beyond. Stat Med 27:157–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roelen CA, van Rhenen W, Bültmann U, Groothoff JW, van der Klink JJ, Heymans MW (2013a) The development and validation of two prediction models to identify employees with high sickness absence. Eur J Public Health 23:128–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roelen CA, Magerøy N, van Rhenen W, Groothoff JW, van der Klink JJ, Pallesen S et al (2013b) Low job satisfaction does not identify nurses at risk of future sickness absence: results from a Norwegian cohort study. Int J Nurs Stud 50:366–373

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sanne B, Torp S, Mykletun A, Dahl AA (2005) The Swedish Demand-Control-Support Questionnaire (DCSQ): factor structure, item analyses, and internal consistency in a large population. Scand J Public Health 33:166–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saunders JB, Aasland OG, Babor TF, de la Fuente JR, Grant M (1993) Development of the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT): WHO collaborative project on early detection of persons with harmful alcohol consumption–II. Addiction 88:791–804

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Severens JL, Mulder J, Laheij RJ, Verbeek AL (2000) Precision and accuracy in meauring absence from work as a basis for calculating productivity costs in The Netherlands. Soc Sci Med 51:243–249

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stapelfeldt CM, Jensen C, Andersen NT, Fleten N, Nielsen CV (2012) Validation of sick leave measures: sick leave and sickness benefit data from a Danish national register compared to multiple workplace-registered sick leave spells in a Danish municipality. BMC Public Health 12:661

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steyerberg EW (2009) Clinical prediction models. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Steyerberg EW, Vickers AJ, Cook NR, Gerds T, Gonen M, Obuchowski N et al (2010) Assessing the performance of prediction models. Epidemiology 21:128–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ströber J (2001) The social desirability scale-17 (SDS-17): convergent validity, discriminant validity, and relationship with age. Eur J Psychol Assess 17:222–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sundström J, Byberg L, Gedeborg R, Michaëlsson K, Berglund L (2011) Useful tests of usefulness of new risk factors: tools for assessing reclassification and discrimination. Scand J Public Health 39:439–441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Doef M, Maes S (1999) The job demand-control(-support) model and psychological well-being: a review of 20 years empirical research. Work Stress 13:87–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voss M, Stark S, Alfredsson L, Vingård E, Josephson M (2008) Comparisons of self-reported and register data on sickness absence among public employees in Sweden. Occup Environ Med 65:61–67

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. A. M. Roelen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Roelen, C.A.M., Heymans, M.W., Twisk, J.W.R. et al. Updating and prospective validation of a prognostic model for high sickness absence. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 88, 113–122 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-014-0942-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-014-0942-9

Keywords

Navigation