Intervention and the integration | Evidence and examples |
Various ideas and values were introduced and institutionalised at the national level or in project areas to promote health equity. |
|
Some interventions informed China’s rural health system reforms and were adapted accordingly in national and provincial policies. |
|
The enhanced health facilities, well-crafted guidelines and protocols, trained human resources and other improvements in health service delivery have boosted the availability and quality of healthcare services, notably in project counties, and have furnished instructive insights for China’s rural health system reforms. |
|
*During the interviews, it was observed that the terms “hard infrastructure” (yingjian jianshe) and “soft infrastructure” (ruanjian jianshe) were used locally. Specifically, hard infrastructure refers to physical infrastructure such as health facility construction and equipment upgrading, while soft infrastructure refers to personnel training, institutional building, organisational development, policy experimentation and other non-physical aspects of infrastructure development. The collected data revealed that there was a common tendency towards inefficient investment in hard infrastructure over soft infrastructure in China during the 1990s.
†'Demand-side investment’ (xufang touru) and ‘supply-side investment’ (gongfang touru) were noted as local concepts during the interviews. Demand-side investment adopts a people-centred approach that prioritises improving health services accessibility and expanding medical insurance coverage. Supply-side investment, on the other hand, focuses on enhancing the capacity of health services provision such as health facility upgrading and training for health workforce’s technical skills. The respondents indicated that the lack of emphasis on demand-side investment had been identified as a crucial bottleneck in China’s rural health system during the inception of the BHSP.
BHSP, Basic Health Services Project.