Institutional characteristic | Number of statements | Number of pro-choice (n, %) | Number of neutral (n, %) | Number of antiabortion (n, %) | OR of pro-choice (p value) |
Overall | 64 | 41 (64.06%) | 22 (34.38%) | 1 (1.56%) | – |
Degree type | 1.82 (p=0.68) | ||||
Allopathic (MD) | 62 | 40 (64.51%) | 22 (35.49%) | 0 (0.00%) | |
Osteopathic (DO) | 2 | 1 (50.00%) | 0 (0.00%) | 1 (50.00%) | |
Geographic location | 3.35 (p=0.03) | ||||
Protective | 37 | 28 (75.67%) | 9 (24.33%) | 0 (0.00%) | |
Mixed restrictions and protections | 8 | 5 (62.50%) | 2 (25.00%) | 1 (12.50%) | |
Restrictive | 19 | 8 (42.11%) | 11 (57.89%) | 0 (0.00%) | |
Institutional funding | 1.24 (p=0.68) | ||||
Public | 30 | 20 (66.67%) | 10 (33.33%) | 0 (0.00%) | |
Private | 34 | 21 (61.76%) | 12 (35.29%) | 1 (2.94%) | |
Religious affiliation | 0.17 (p=0.13) | ||||
Religious affiliation | 4 | 1 (25.00%) | 2 (50.00%) | 1 (25.00%) | |
No religious affiliation | 60 | 40 (66.67%) | 20 (33.33%) | 0 (0.00%) | |
Family planning division | 2.39 (p=0.11) | ||||
Present | 31 | 23 (74.19%) | 8 (25.80%) | 0 (0.00%) | |
Absent | 33 | 18 (54.54%) | 14 (42.42%) | 1 (3.03%) |
*OR compares protective states to restrictive states and excludes states with mixed restrictions and protections.