Attributes | Indicators | Surveillance level | Denominator | Expected performance | Observed n (%) |
Usefulness | Surveillance units that produced reports/bulletin for decision-making | National county and district | 17 surveillance units | 100% | 17 (100%) |
Simplicity | Case-based reporting forms required by the system for reporting suspected EVD | National county and district | NA | 1 | 1 |
Existing reporting channels required for reporting suspected cases of EVD | National county and district | NA | 1 | 2 | |
Case-based reporting forms required by the system for reporting a suspected EVD case | Health facility | NA | 1 | 1 | |
Existing reporting channels required for reporting suspected cases of EVD | Health facility | NA | 1 | 3 | |
Flexibility | Subsystems with which the EVD system is interoperable | National county and district | Total number of existing subsystems | 80% | 14 (100%) |
Changes made to EVD case detection and reporting | National county and district | NA | 1 | 1 (100%) | |
Stability | Surveillance units reporting unscheduled electrical power outages that occurred | National county and district | 17 surveillance units | 0 | 17 (100%) |
Surveillance units reporting EVD surveillance activities unhindered by lack of funds | National county and district | 17 surveillance units | 100% | 6 (35.3%) | |
Acceptability | Stakeholders actively participated in surveillance and response activities | National county and district | Total number of stakeholders required to participate in the system | 80% | 85% |
Representativeness | Reporting sites that sent weekly surveillance reports (including zero reports) of suspected EVD | National county and district | Total number of reporting sites observed during the recall period | 100% | 15 (100%) |
EVD, Ebola virus disease; N/A, not applicable (indicators characterised as ‘number’ observed…, eg, number of case-based forms).