Table 3

Effect of CAS on secondary outcomes: growth monitoring and supplementary nutrition services by community health workers

MPBihar
Model 1Model 2Model 1Model 2
Growth monitoring of infants <12 months (n=6635)
% of mothers who reported that their child aged 0–12 months was weighed by CHNW at least once in last 3 months
 Beta0.00
(−0.03 to 0.04); p=0.87
0.01
(−0.03 to 0.05); p=0.66
0.22
(0.18–0.25); p<0.001
0.24
(0.19–0.28); p<0.001
 Comparison mean0.660.660.180.17
% of mothers who reported that CHNW discussed their child’s weight or showed child’s growth chart
 Beta−0.02
(−0.05 to 0.01); p=0.20
−0.00
(−0.05 to 0.04); p=0.86
0.15
(0.13–0.18); p<0.001
0.15
(0.13–0.20); p<0.001
 Comparison mean0.480.480.150.15
THR supplementation to mothers of children <12 months (n=6635)
% of mothers (0–12 months child) who received THR at least once a month from CHNW
 Beta−0.01
(−0.04 to 0.01); p=0.34
−0.00
(−0.04 to 0.04); p=0.86
−0.04
(−0.07 to 0.00); p=0.046
−0.03
(−0.08 to 0.02); p=0.24
 Comparison mean0.720.720.350.34
% of mothers (0–12 months child) who recall being counselled about mother’s/child’s THR consumption by CHNW in last 3 months
 Beta0.09
(0.06–0.12); p<0.001
0.10
(0.05–0.14); p<0.001
0.08
(0.06–0.10); p<0.001
0.09
(0.06–0.12); p<0.001
 Comparison mean0.390.390.150.14
  • CHNW, community health and nutrition worker; THR, take-home ration.