Situation analysis/environmental scan | Methods for generation of initial list of topics | Use of prioritisation criteria | Stakeholder engagement | Description of ranking process/ technique | Dissemination and implementation | Revision or appeal mechanism | Monitoring and evaluation | |
N (%) approaches reporting the aspect | 7 (28) | 19 (76) | 18 (72) | 23 (92) | 18 (72) | 16 (64) | 10 (40) | 10 (40) |
Abma, 201050 | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |||||
Ball, 201664 | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||||
Bennett, 2010; Bennett, 2012; Saldanha, 201341–43 | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||||
Berra, 201059 | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |||||
Carson, 200058 | ✓ | |||||||
Chang, 201260 | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||
Chapman, 201365 | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||
Cowan, 201345 | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
Dubois 201161 | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||
Edwards, 201952 | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |||
Franck, 2018; Franck, 202049 56 | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||||
Ghaffar, 2009; 200938 48 | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |||
Hacking, 201644† | ✓ | ✓ | ||||||
Kapiriri, 201863 | ✓ | ✓ | ✓* | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
Lomas, 200346 | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||
Montorzi, 201047 | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
NIH 200157 | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||||
Okello, 2000; Lansang 199739 40 | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
Pratt, 201655† | ✓ | ✓* | ✓ | ✓ | ||||
Rudan, 200837 | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||
Somanadhan, 2020 53 * | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||||
Viergever, 201062 | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
Wald, 201451 | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |||
WHO, 199675 | ✓ | ✓ | ||||||
Yan, 202054 | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
*In this approach, ‘ importance’ and ‘feasibility’ were proposed as prioritisation criteria, but authors only considered the score for ‘importance’ when generating the top priorities.
†These approaches indicated the use of prioritisation criteria but did not propose criteria.