Table 2

Considered retrospective studies that found no evidence for an early SARS-CoV-2 circulation

ReferenceMethodsSamplesStudy period and locationFindingsCaveats (#) and confirmations (§)
38RT-PCR631 nasopharyngeal swabs collected from outpatients with ILI by sentinel physicians within the regional influenza surveillance networkNov 2019–Feb 2020
Lombardy (Italy)
No evidence of SARS-CoV-2 circulation# Single methodological approach
# Results not confirmed by another laboratory
37RT-PCR1581 respiratory samples collected within the framework of the regional influenza surveillance systemNov 2019–Apr 2020
Lombardy (Italy)
First SARS-CoV-2 detection at the beginning of Mar# Single methodological approach
# Results not confirmed by another laboratory
39RT-PCRMucus obtained from nasopharyngeal swabs collected from 166 patients with SARINov 2019–Mar 2020
Rome (Italy)
No evidence of SARS-CoV-2 circulation# Patients from an area not primarily involved during the first wave
# Single methodological approach
# Results not confirmed by another laboratory
41RT-PCR1683 oropharyngeal swabs from hospitalised patients with SARINov 2019–Feb 2020
Liguria, Tuscany, Lazio, Puglia (Italy)
No evidence of SARS-CoV-2 circulation# Patients from an area not primarily involved during the first wave
# Single methodological approach
# Results not confirmed by another laboratory
40RT-PCR, metagenomic sequencing5833 nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal swabs collected from patients hospitalised for ILINov 2019–Mar 2020
Valencia (Spain)
No evidence of SARS-CoV-2 circulation before Mar 2020# Patients from an area not primarily involved during the first wave
# Single methodological approach
# Negative results not confirmed by another laboratory
§ The positive sample from March was confirmed by sequencing
§ The positivity was confirmed by another laboratory
  • ILI, influenza-like illness; RT-PCR, real-time PCR; SARI, severe acute respiratory illness.