Summary of the different Tiny Targets acceptability elements reported by participants in Dunda (CB) and Bengi-Kitoy (PL), 2018
| Acceptability elements | Reported by dunda (CB) | Reported by Bengi-Kitoy (PL) |
| Previous knowledge about the disease | + | + |
| Perception importance of the disease | − | − |
| Perception of nuisances caused by vector | + | + |
| Perception of good information received | + | − |
| Perception of Tiny Targets efficacy | + | +/− |
| Perception of TIny Targets placement strategy effectiveness | + | − |
| Perception of no negative side effects (for health or environment) | +/− | Not mentioned |
| No supernatural danger perceived | +/− | − |
| No anxiety caused by community outsiders | +/− | − |
| Assuming control feeling | Not mentioned | − |
+, present, −, not present,+/−, partly present.
CB, community based; PL, programme led.