Table 3A

Intention-to-treat analysis of intervention impact on primary and secondary outcomes reported 29 months postrandomisation among ever partnered women

Type of intimate partner violence/abuseIntervention (n=550)*
N (%)
Control
(n=575)
N (%)
Crude OR (95% CI) p valueAdjusted OR
(95% CI) p value
Physical (primary)113 (21%)117 (20%) 1.1 (0.75 to 1.36)
 0.934
0.98 (0.72 to 1.33)
0.892
Sexual (primary)109 (20%)121 (21%)0.93 (0.69 to 1.26)
0.648
0.98 (0.72 to 1.32)
0.881
Emotional216 (39%)259 (45%)0.79 (0.61 to 1.03)
0.079
0.74 (0.56 to 0.98)
0.035
n=170n=177
Disclosed IPV in past year (among those experiencing physical/sexual IPV in past year)118 (69%)135 (76%)0.71 (0.44 to 1.14)
0.151
0.75 (0.46 to 1.21)
0.239
Attitude/belief(n=551)(n=575)
Attitudes accepting of IPV282 (51%)373 (65%)0.56 (0.42 to 0.74)
<0.001
0.49 (0.36 to 0.66)
<0.001
Believes a woman should tolerate violence in order to keep her family together82 (15%)148 (26%)0.50 (0.37 to 0.69)
<0.001
0.48 (0.34 to 0.66)
<0.001
Believes IPV is a private matter and others should not intervene58 (11%)100 (17%)0.56 (0.39 to 0.81)
0.002
0.54 (0.38 to 0.78)
0.001
  • *One woman reported never being partnered so excluded from the analysis.

  • IPV, intimate partner violence.