Intention-to-treat analysis of intervention impact on primary and secondary outcomes reported 29 months postrandomisation among ever partnered women
| Type of intimate partner violence/abuse | Intervention (n=550)* N (%) | Control (n=575) N (%) | Crude OR (95% CI) p value | Adjusted OR (95% CI) p value |
| Physical (primary) | 113 (21%) | 117 (20%) | 1.1 (0.75 to 1.36) 0.934 | 0.98 (0.72 to 1.33) 0.892 |
| Sexual (primary) | 109 (20%) | 121 (21%) | 0.93 (0.69 to 1.26) 0.648 | 0.98 (0.72 to 1.32) 0.881 |
| Emotional | 216 (39%) | 259 (45%) | 0.79 (0.61 to 1.03) 0.079 | 0.74 (0.56 to 0.98) 0.035 |
| n=170 | n=177 | |||
| Disclosed IPV in past year (among those experiencing physical/sexual IPV in past year) | 118 (69%) | 135 (76%) | 0.71 (0.44 to 1.14) 0.151 | 0.75 (0.46 to 1.21) 0.239 |
| Attitude/belief | (n=551) | (n=575) | ||
| Attitudes accepting of IPV | 282 (51%) | 373 (65%) | 0.56 (0.42 to 0.74) <0.001 | 0.49 (0.36 to 0.66) <0.001 |
| Believes a woman should tolerate violence in order to keep her family together | 82 (15%) | 148 (26%) | 0.50 (0.37 to 0.69) <0.001 | 0.48 (0.34 to 0.66) <0.001 |
| Believes IPV is a private matter and others should not intervene | 58 (11%) | 100 (17%) | 0.56 (0.39 to 0.81) 0.002 | 0.54 (0.38 to 0.78) 0.001 |
*One woman reported never being partnered so excluded from the analysis.
IPV, intimate partner violence.