Comparing sex/gender reporting in general medical journals and global health specialist journals, by research and non-research articles
| Sex/gender reporting framework | Research articles | Non-Research articles | ||||
| Total (n=280) | General medical journals (n=120) | Global health specialist journals (n=160) | Total (n=262) | General medical journals (n=120) | Global health specialist journals (n=142) | |
| Pre-specified sex/gender analysis | 8% | 6% | 10% | |||
| Reported gender of study participants | 72% | 91% | 57% | |||
| Percentage of female participants | ||||||
| 0%–25% | 8% | 8% | 8% | |||
| 25%–50% | 43% | 47% | 36% | |||
| 50%–75% | 43% | 41% | 45% | |||
| 75%–100% | 7% | 4% | 11% | |||
| Reported participation of transgender/non-binary participants | 0.7% | 0% | 1% | |||
| Stated how sex/gender was determined | 6% | 5% | 6% | |||
| Performed any form of analysis of sex/gender differences (excluding eight articles w/ single sex participants) | 59% | 71% | 50% | |||
| Featured sex and/or gender in discussion | 40% | 29% | 49% | |||
| Focused on an issue specifically relating to sex/gender | 8% | 6% | 10% | |||
| Referred to sex/gender related issues anywhere in text | 40% | 29% | 50% | |||
The dark grey colour indicates there is no data in that cell.