Mapping multisectoral implications of adolescent health
# | Intervention approaches/settings | Health issues | Health sector role and actors | Alignment |
1 | Adolescent-friendly health services at health facilities11 19 31 | Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights (SRHR) Mental health | Health sector as lead actor as service provision in health facilities is its core mandate. | Referral linkages between health, education, social services, justice system and peer led networks reinforce the impact of health or constraining if there are not clear systems for referral between the sectors. Good adolescent health services are an enabling factor supporting non-health goals such as school retention. |
2 | Individual-based/family-based interventions8 11 19 32
| SRHR Mental Health Violence prevention | Health sector as a lead, bilateral/trilateral or minimal actor depending on the intervention or context
| Collaboration is reinforcing or enabling, but could also be constraining if there are not clear referral systems, understanding of roles and responsibilities, counteracting if lack of shared vision between various sectors or if other sectors are not effective in preventing violence or when harmful social norms and practices continue or increase. |
3 | School based interventions8 9 11 19 32 33
| SRHR Mental health Violence prevention | Health and education sector as bilateral/trilateral actors for school based interventions
| Collaboration between health and education and other sectors could be categorised as reinforcing or enabling but could also be constraining when education and health is not aligned, or counteracting if broader societal contexts are harmful, particularly with regards to gender. |
4 | Youth centres11
| SRHR | Health sector as a bilateral/trilateral partner or minimal actor depending on the intervention and context
| Collaboration between actors could be described as enabling or reinforcing as provision of services through youth centres could contribute to goals of various actors, however it could also be constraining if policies and programmes not aligned. |
5 | Community mobilisation8 12 13 19 32
| SRHR Mental health Violence prevention | Health sector as a bilateral/trilateral sector, supporting or minimal actor depending on the intervention and context
| Collaboration could be categorised as multisectoral as preventing harmful practices are inextricably linked to adolescent health constraining if there are not clear systems for referral between the sectors or counteracting if a lack of a shared vision or if conflicts with local norms and practices or when legal and policy environment not supportive. |
6 | Conditional cash transfers11 (CCTs) to adolescents
Unconditional cash transfers (UCTs) to adolescents | SRHR | Health sector as bilateral/trilateral or minimal actor depending on the intervention and context
| Collaboration could be categorised as reinforcing as interventions which include CCTs have a positive contribution to achieving adolescent health goals and outcomes, and enabling for UCTs as better well-being is supported by health services indirectly. |
7 | Improve/retain secondary school enrolment and quality of education20 32 | SRHR Mental health | Health sector as a minimal actor
| Collaboration could be categorised as enabling as improving retention in secondary school is inextricably linked to adolescent health goals and outcomes. Counteracting when not supported by legal and policy framework and cross cutting gender inequality systems. |