Table 3

Neonatal mortality rates and calculated risk ratios

InterventionControlMortality definitionAuthor (year)Mortality outcome intervention, n (%)Mortality outcome control, n (%)RR95%CIP valueGRADE quality of evidence
ANTENATAL INTERVENTIONS
Four doses of dexamethasone 6 mg 12 hours apartStandard careStillbirthsAlthabe et al20 (2015)748 (22.9)739 (24.7)0.990.90–1.090.81⨁⨁⨁⨁
High
Perinatal mortalityAlthabe et al20 (2015)1203 (36.8)1172 (39.1)0.970.91–1.040.46⨁⨁⨁⨁
High
7-day neonatal mortalityAlthabe et al20 (2015)455 (13.9)433 (14.4)0.940.84–1.060.30⨁⨁⨁⨁
High
28-day neonatal mortalityAlthabe et al20 (2015)566 (22.4)524 (23.2)0.960.87–1.060.65⨁⨁⨁⨁
High
Garces et al36 (2016)36 (18.3)39 (23.5)0.740.68–0.81<0·0001⨁⨁⨁⨁
High
Klein et al39 (2016)Belgaum, India133 (25)158 (25.6)0.960.75–1.22NA⨁⨁⨁◯
Moderate*
Nagpur, India109 (30.5)84 (32.9)0.940.72–1.23NA⨁⨁⨁◯
Moderate*
Pakistan172 (22.6)172 (25)0.890.80–0.99NA⨁⨁⨁⨁
High
Zambia30 (15.2)27 (12.7)1.430.90–2.28NA⨁⨁⨁◯
Moderate*
Kenya45 (19.2)27 (14.3)1.300.94–1.81NA⨁⨁⨁◯
Moderate*
Guatemala57 (16.5)39 (23.5)0.750.69–0.82NA⨁⨁⨁⨁
High
Argentina20 (22)17 (13)1.600.99–2.58NA⨁⨁⨁◯
Moderate*
Two doses of 12 mg of dexamethasone 24 hours apartRasool et al43 (2017)0 (0)†2 (8.4)†0.200.01–3.960.29⨁◯◯◯
Very lowद**
Maintenance tocolysis with nifedipineStandard carePerinatal mortalityAggarwal et al21 (2018)2 (11.1)3 (13)0.850.16–4.570.85⨁⨁◯◯
Low**
POSTNATAL INTERVENTIONS
Feeding interventions
Fortified pasteurised donor human milk (PDHM)Unfortified PDHM28-day neonatal mortalityAdhisivam et al25 (2018)3 (7.5)3 (7.5)1.000.21–4.661.00⨁⨁◯◯
Low**
Hybrid milk feedsMother’s milk aloneNandakumar et al42 (2020)4 (6.4)5 (8.4)0.760.21–2.700.67⨁◯◯◯
Very low¶††‡‡**
Infection prevention
Single cord cleansing with chlorhexidineDry cord care28-day neonatal mortalityArifeenet al27 (2012)LBW: 121 (3.8)145 (4.7)0.820.63–1.06NA⨁⨁⨁⨁
High
Preterm: 78 (4.0)128 (6.2)0.650.50–0.86NA⨁⨁⨁⨁
High
Multiple cord cleansing with chlorhexidineLBW: 159 (4.7)145 (4.7)1.000.79–1.27NA⨁⨁⨁⨁
High
Preterm: 119 (5.4)128 (6.2)0.880.69–1.12NA⨁⨁⨁⨁
High
Skin cleansing with chlorhexidinePlaceboTielsch et al47 (2007)83 (3.4)117 (4.7)0.720.55–0.95NA⨁⨁⨁⨁
High
Topical ointment
SSO
 Standard skin careDarmstadt et al34 (2004)12 (23.5)18 (34.6)0.680.37–1.260.29⨁⨁◯◯
Low*§¶§§
SSO and AquaphorDarmstadt et al35 (2008)SSO: 105 (65.8)128 (70.6)SSO: 0.93SSO: 0.81–1.08SSO: 0.36⨁⨁◯◯
Low*§¶§§
Aquaphor: 85 (54.2)128 (70.6)Aquaphor: 0.77Aquaphor: 0.64–0.91Aquaphor: 0·0023⨁⨁◯◯
Low*¶¶§§
Aquaphor21-day neonatal mortalityErdemir et al23 (2015)10 (10)4 (4.1)2.430.79–7.470.12⨁⨁◯◯
Low*¶¶§§
Supplementation
Selenium
 Glucon-D powder alone28-day neonatal mortalityAggarwal et al26 (2016)2 (4.4)3 (6.7)0.670.12–3.800.65⨁◯◯◯
Very low*****
Bovine lactoferrinPlaceboKaur et al37 (2015)0 (0)5 (7.5)0.100.01–1.710.11⨁⨁◯◯
Low**
Early BCG vaccineLate BCGAaby et al24 (2011)27 (2.3)48 (4.2)0.550.35–0.880.01⨁⨁⨁⨁
High§§
Biering Sorensen et al31 (2017)44 (2.1)62 (3.0)0.710.49–1.040.08⨁⨁⨁⨁
High§§
Prophylactic fluconazolePlaceboKirpal et al38 (2016)7 (18.4)12 (32.4)0.570.25–1.280.17⨁⨁⨁◯
Moderate*
Strategies of newborn care
Early KMCLate KMC28-day neonatal mortalityNagai et al41 (2010)2 (5.4)1 (2.8)1.950.18–20.530.58⨁⨁◯◯
Low**
Conventional careWorku et al47 (2005)14 (22.5)24 (38)0.570.33–1.000.05⨁⨁⨁◯
Moderate*
Community KMCStandard home-based careSloan et al45 (2008)≤2500 g: 22 (5.4)20 (6)0.87†††0.43–1.74†††0.69†††⨁⨁⨁⨁
High§§
≤2000 g: 9 (9.5)16 (22.5)0.37†††0.16–0.86†††0.02†††⨁⨁⨁◯
Moderate*
Mazumder et al40 (2019)73 (1.6)90 (2.3)0.710.52–0.960.03⨁⨁⨁⨁
High§§
Home-based neonatal carePreintervention periodBang et al29 (1999)LBW: 13 (4)36 (11.3)0.360.20–0.670·0011⨁⨁⨁⨁
High
Preterm: 9 (9.7)25 (33.3)0.290.14–0.580·0005⨁⨁⨁⨁
High
Bang, Baitule et al28 (2005)Preterm: 23 (10.2)25 (33.3)0.310.18–0.500.00⨁⨁⨁⨁
High
LBW: 39 (4.7)36 (11.3)0.420.27–0.650·0001⨁⨁⨁⨁
High
Bang, Reddy et al30 (2005)12 (8.5)25 (33.3)0.250.14–0.480·0000⨁⨁⨁⨁
High
Training of traditional birth attendantsENC: preintervention period
NRP: No additional training
StillbirthsCarlo et al22 (2010)ENC: 157 (43.7)ENC: 72 (42.6)ENC: 1.03ENC: 0.80–1.31NA⨁⨁⨁◯
Moderate*
NRP: 91 (33.3)NRP: 101 (34.2)NRP: 0.97NRP: 0.57–1.67NA⨁⨁⨁◯
Moderate*
Perinatal mortalityENC: 283 (78.8)ENC: 133 (78.7)ENC: 1.02ENC: 0.91–1.14NA⨁⨁⨁⨁
High
NRP: 198 (72.5)NRP: 225 (76.3)NRP: 0.95NRP: 0.84–1.07NA⨁⨁⨁⨁
High
7-day neonatal mortalityENC: 126 (35.1)ENC: 61 (36.1)ENC: 1.03ENC: 0.83–1.27NA⨁⨁⨁⨁
High
NRP: 107 (39.2)NRP: 124 (42)NRP: 0.92NRP: 0.77–1.09NA⨁⨁⨁⨁
High
Others
Delayed cord clampingEarly cord clamping28-day neonatal mortalityChopra et al33 (2018)1 (1.8)03.160.13–75.980.48⨁◯◯◯
Very low**‡‡‡
Heated mattressAir-heated incubatorsSarman et al44 (1989)6 (21.4)11 (34.4)0.620.26–1.470.28⨁⨁⨁◯
Moderate*
Quality improvement interventionPreintervention periodCavicchiolo et al32 (2016)200 (33.0)192 (43.0)0.770.66–0.900.001⨁⨁⨁◯
Moderate§§§
  • *Insufficient sample to meet optimal information size (OIS) criteria and/or 95% CI close to or crosses line of no effect or fails to exclude important benefit or harm.

  • †The mortality event rate is based on the number of women per study arm who received the intervention.

  • ‡Identification and recruitment of individual participants occurred after randomisation.

  • §Method of randomisation is not reported, baseline differences suggest a problem with randomisation.

  • ¶Information about blinding of participants and carers is not provided.

  • **Insufficient sample to meet OIS criteria with very few events and 95% CI fails to exclude important benefit or harm.

  • ††Allocation concealment is not reported.

  • ‡‡Method of ascertainment of mortality outcome measure is not reported.

  • §§Derived from the meta-analysis pooling the results of both studies.

  • ¶¶I2 of 76%, p value of 0,04, minimal overlapping 95% CIs and one study showing benefit while the other study shows harm suggest serious inconsistency of results.

  • ***Loss to follow-up and failure to conduct both analyses considering only those who adhered to treatment, and all patients for whom outcome data are available.

  • †††OR; adjusted for cluster design effect.

  • ‡‡‡Substantial loss to follow-up in relation to the number of events and failure to adhere to the intention-to-treat principle.

  • §§§Confounding due to baseline differences cannot be excluded and is not controlled for in the study.