Table 4

Mortality rates during hospitalisation and calculated risk ratios

InterventionControlAuthor (year)Mortality outcome intervention, n (%)Mortality outcome control, n (%)RR95% CIP valueGRADE quality of evidence
Feeding interventions
3-hour feeding schedule2-hour feeding scheduleTali et al67 (2016)00NANANA⨁⨁◯◯
Low*
Infection prevention
rhG-CSFEmpirical antibiotics aloneAktas et al48 (2015)10 (30.3)6 (26.1)1.160.49–2.740.73⨁⨁◯◯
Low*
SynbioticsStandard careNandhini et al62 (2016)10 (9.3)9 (8.2)1.130.48–2.680.78⨁⨁◯◯
Low*
Lactobacillus sporogenesBreast milk or formula aloneSari et al64 (2011)3 (2.7)4 (3.6)0.760.17–3.300.71⨁⨁◯◯
Low*
Prevention and treatment of respiratory morbidity
Nasal-jet CPAPBubble CPAPBhatti et al52 (2015)20 (25)16 (18)1.410.78–2.520.25⨁⨁⨁◯
Moderate†
Bubble CPAPFlow driver CPAPMazmanyan et al60 (2016)3 (4.5)1 (1.7)2.680.29–25.080.39⨁⨁◯◯
Low*‡
Preintervention periodOkello et al63 (2019)58 (26.5)62 (39.2)0.680.50–0.910.01⨁⨁◯◯
Low§
VLBW 36 (19.7)41 (31.5)0.620.42–0.920.02⨁⨁◯◯
Low§
ELBW 22 (61.1)21 (75)0.820.58–1.140.23⨁◯◯◯
Very low†§
Ventilator-derived CPAPTagare et al66 (2013)4 (7)5 (8.8)0.800.23–2.830.73⨁⨁◯◯
Low*
Binasal prongNasal mask for applying nasal CPAPSay et al65 (2016)4 (5.4)7 (9.3)0.560.17–1.850.34⨁⨁◯◯
Low*
Surfactant
  • Poractant alfa

 BeractantGharehbaghi et al54 (2010)21 (26.6)15 (21.1)1.260.70–2.250.44⨁⨁⨁◯
Moderate†
  • LISA method

Conventional INSURE methodHalim et al56 (2018)19 (38)28 (56)0.680.44–1.040.08⨁⨁⨁◯
Moderate†
  • Goat lung surfactant extract

BeractantJain et al57 (2019)21 (40.4)14 (30.4)1.330.77–2.300.31⨁⨁⨁◯
Moderate†
Vitamin A supplementationPlaceboBasu et al51 (2019)9 (9.2)16 (16.3)0.560.26–1.210.14⨁⨁⨁◯
Moderate†
Pulse oximetryPreintervention periodGraham et al55 (2019)82 (13.4)326 (17.4)1.120.56–2.26¶0.76¶⨁⨁⨁◯
Moderate†
Full O2 systemPreintervention period203 (19.5)326 (17.4)0.99¶0.61–1.59¶0.96¶⨁⨁⨁◯
Moderate†
Volume-guaranteed ventilationPressure-controlled ventilationKrishna et al58 (2019)4 (10)5 (12.2)0.820.24–2.840.75⨁⨁◯◯
Low*
AminophyllineCaffeineKumar et al59 (2017)16 (21.9)15 (21.4)1.020.55–1.910.94⨁⨁◯◯
Low†**
High flow nasal cannulaNasal CPAPMurki et al61 (2018)4 (3.0)3 (2.1)1.390.32–6.110.66⨁⨁◯◯
Low*
Strategies of newborn care
Maternal nursing careSpecial care baby unitArif et al49 (1999)43 (28.5)141 (66.8)0.430.33–0.560·0000⨁⨁⨁◯
Moderate**
Stepdown unitPreintervention periodBhutta et al53 (2004)55 (17.3)63 (33)0.520.38–0.720·0001⨁⨁⨁◯
Moderate§
Others
Oral paracetamol for PDA closureOral ibuprofenBalachander et al50 (2018)12 (21.8)11 (20)1.100.53–2.260.81⨁⨁◯◯
Low*
Polythene tobacco wrapStandard nursing procedureVan Den Bosch et al68 (1996)06 (54.5)0.060·0036–0.930.04⨁⨁◯◯
Low†**
  • *Insufficient sample to meet optimal information size (OIS) criteria with very few events and 95% CI fails to exclude important benefit or harm.

  • †Insufficient sample to meet OIS criteria and/or 95% CI close to or crosses line of no effect or fails to exclude important benefit or harm.

  • ‡Derived from the meta-analysis pooling the results of both studies.

  • §Serious risk of selection bias.

  • ¶Mixed-model odds ratio; accounted for the clustering of patients within hospitals and adjusted for time trends.

  • **Substantial loss to follow-up in relation to the number of events and failure to adhere to the intention-to-treat principle.