Table 4

Primary and secondary outcomes among female participants in the Indashyikirwa couples’ cohort

ArmBaselineMidlineEndline12-month outcomesFinal 24-month outcomes
aRR/β95% CIP valueaRR/β95% CIP value
%/MeanN/SE%/MeanN/SE%/MeanN/SELower boundUpper boundLower boundUpper bound
Primary outcome
Experience of physical or sexual IPV in the past 12 months from current male partner, assessed with What Works consortium definitionI49.8%41233.7%27834.7%2830.360.270.48<0.0010.440.340.59<0.001
C41.1%33743.5%35541.7%334
Secondary outcomes
IPV-related secondary outcomes
By experience of IPV reported at baseline
Among women reporting NO experience of IPV (What Works definition) in the past year at baseline (n=898 total, 415 Intervention and 483 control)I0.0%018.1%7522.0%900.590.360.950.030.740.461.170.19
C0.0%025.0%12026.7%126
Among women who DID experience of IPV (What Works definition) in the past year at baseline (n=749 total, 412 intervention and 337 control)I100.0%41249.5%20347.7%1930.220.130.40<0.0010.350.200.61<0.001
C100.0%33769.9%23563.2%208
By specific type of IPV
Any experience of physical intimate partner violence from the main partner in the past 12 monthsI42.8%35425.7%21125.5%2060.340.250.45<0.0010.390.290.53<0.001
C33.2%27234.4%28032.3%257
Any experience of being forced or coerced into sexual activity by the main partner in the past 12 monthsI45.1%37333.1%27232.3%2610.490.370.65<0.0010.490.370.66<0.001
C37.6%30838.5%31438.1%303
Any experience of economic abuse by the main partner in the past 12 monthsI46.4%38433.0%27331.2%2520.450.340.60<0.0010.310.240.41<0.001
C38.4%31539.9%32543.3%345
Any experience of emotional aggression/abuse from main partner in the past 12 monthsI74.7%61867.2%55160.8%4920.820.621.100.190.550.410.73<0.001
C70.4%57767.0%54666.8%532
Children in household witnessing IPV
Children in household witnessing IPV (taken out of all hh with kids and physical or sexual IPV in the last 12 months at each wave, n=771 at baseline, n=674 at midline, n=649 at endline)I45.8%197/43030.4%93/30632.8%102/3110.310.190.50<0.0010.330.200.54<0.001
C43.5%156/35942.4%162/38242.8%146/341
Help seeking
Help seeking among survivors of IPV (taken out of women reporting any physical or sexual IPV in the last 12 months at each wave, n=895 at baseline, n=766 at midline, n=743 at endline)I57.2%283/49554.3%191/35255.6%195/3511.070.761.510.691.050.741.480.78
C51.5%217/42147.7%204/42850.4%199/395
Relationship quality
Level of conflict in intimate partnership (Possible range 0–24; lower scores represent better outcomes)I5.270.223.850.194.420.230.30.370.22<0.0010.310.380.23<0.001
C4.400.254.580.165.360.25
Quality of conflict management strategies (Possible range 6–24, higher scores represent better outcomes)I15.240.2316.480.2216.160.181.140.851.43<0.0010.970.681.26<0.001
C15.450.1515.470.1515.310.19
Couple communication: Per cent of couples who achieved the maximum score on a scale for range of topics and frequencyI19.4%16030.9%25431.3%2522.071.532.81<0.0011.781.322.41<0.001
C21.5%17623.3%19025.5%203
Perception of trust, care and respect in relationship with main partner: Per cent of couples who achieved the maximum score on a scale for perception of trust and care in relationshipI26.0%21532.0%26229.4%2381.551.162.06<0.0011.831.362.48<0.001
C30.7%25129.7%24225.3%201
Mental health
Depressive symptoms as assessed using the CES-D short form (Possible range 0–30)I8.740.276.780.256.970.231.642.011.27<0.0011.772.141.40<0.001
C8.040.187.990.248.280.24
Beliefs and community engagement
Acceptability of wife beating (number of reasons endorsed as justifications, range 0–5)I2.300.131.040.090.900.09−0.83−0.92−0.73<0.001−0.94−1.04−0.84<0.001
C2.430.142.370.122.290.12
Self-efficacy for community engagement (Possible range 2–6; higher scores represent better outcomes)I3.890.044.530.034.760.060.400.300.49<0.0010.590.500.69<0.001
C4.010.044.200.044.240.07
Participating in action to prevent IPVControl (n=820)74.2%60875.3%61575.8%607RefRef
Couples training only (n=514)68.3%35189.1%45690.8%4564.703.236.83<0.0015.443.668.07<0.001
Self-reported activist training participants (n=313)67.7%21293.6%29394.3%2959.675.7216.3<0.00110.305.9717.8<0.001
Women's exploratory outcomes
Economic outcomes, past month
Any earned incomeI49.5%40962.2%51368.2%5541.160.881.520.301.451.101.920.01
C58.9%48264.6%52767.0%535
Any household debt paymentsI81.5%67487.7%72388.3%7201.410.991.990.051.260.881.810.20
C82.8%67985.3%69787.2%697
Food securityI17.7%14615.0%12424.5%2001.100.801.510.572.121.572.86<0.001
C21.7%17815.3%12516.7%134
Hunger scoreI4.950.095.010.084.660.08−0.26−0.40−0.13<0.001−0.46−0.60−0.33<0.001
C4.760.105.180.085.040.07
Parenting
Endorses statements supporting physical punishment of childrenI50.3%41636.6%30038.0%3070.300.230.39<0.0010.340.260.45<0.001
C49.3%40454.9%44754.4%434
Reports punishing children by smacking or beating themI84.8%62680.7%60276.8%5730.390.260.59<0.0010.460.310.68<0.001
C84.7%61587.4%65284.9%613
Health-related outcomes
Self-rated healthI66.8%55275.9%62670.8%5772.201.652.91<0.0011.981.512.61<0.001
C71.0%59067.4%55163.3%506
PTSD symptomsIn/a11.290.3611.580.34−0.09−0.14−0.05<0.001−0.08−0.13−0.04<0.001
Cn/a12.360.2812.560.24
Problematic alcohol useIn/a4.7%394.2%340.850.431.680.630.960.471.980.92
Cn/a4.5%373.8%30
  • CES-D, Center for Epidemiologic Studies–Depression ; IPV, intimate partner violence; PTSD, post-traumatic stress disorder.