The impact of the intervention on primary behavioural outcomes
| Primary outcomes | Baseline | Endline | Risk double difference %, (95% CI)* | ||
| Int. N=134 | Control N=133 | Int. N=126 | Control N=121 | ||
| 1. Households with hygienic food prep area | 5 (4) | 3 (2) | 45 (36) | 12 (10) | 21 (4 to 39) |
| 2. Households who store food hygienically | 13 (34) | 17 (52) | 22 (43) | 14 (34) | 27 (0 to 55) |
| 3. Households with a functional handwashing station | 4 (3) | 12 (9) | 44 (40) | 0 (0) | 44 (30 to 58) |
| 4. Households with a safe play environment for children 6–24 months of age | 15 (24) | 23 (32) | 40 (69) | 24 (47) | 31 (37 to 58) |
| 5. Pregant and lactating women who consumed 5+ food groups in previous 24 hours | 22 (27) | 17 (21) | 34 (52) | 17 (32) | 15 (−5 to 35) |
| 6. Children 6–24 months who consumed 4+ food groups in previous 24 hours | 20 (30) | 23 (32) | 32 (55) | 19 (37) | 21 (−4 to 45) |
| 7. Caretaker fed thickened porridge to child | 1 (2) | 2 (3) | 82 (68) | 14 (12) | 57 (47 to 68) |
*Risk double difference calculated using generalised estimating equations is the difference between treatment arms at endline, controlling for baseline values, accounting for community-level clustering.