Food insecurity at baseline and endline
| Food Insecurity | Baseline | Endline | |||
| Intervention N=134, % | Control N=136, % | Intervention N=126, % | Control N=122, % | Risk double difference, (95% CI) * | |
| Households who experienced anxiety and uncertainty about food supply in last 30 days† | 112 (84) | 117 (86) | 88 (69) | 99 (81) | −10% (−27% to 8%) |
| Households who reported insufficient quality of food supply in last 30 days | 120 (90) | 129 (95) | 104 (83) | 114 (93) | −5% (−17% to 6%) |
| Households who reported insufficient food intake and its physical consequences in last 30 days | 120 (90) | 127 (93) | 102 (81) | 110 (90) | −6% (−18% to 7%) |
*Risk double difference calculated using generalised estimating equations is the difference between treatment arms at endline, controlling for baseline values, adjusting for village-level clustering.
†Reported results reflect household responses to occurrence questions only and do not reflect the proscribed Household Food Insecurity Access frequency-of-occurance component. Consequently, these results may differ from other reports in this region.42