Table 4

Association between absence of a labour companion and mistreatment*†‡

Any physical abuse, verbal abuse, or stigma or discriminationPhysical abuseVerbal abuseNon-consented vaginal examinationPoor communication between healthcare providers and womenFelt ignored, neglected or their presence was a nuisance to health workersWaited for long periods of time to be attended by health workers
AOR
(95% CI)
AOR
(95% CI)
AOR
(95% CI)
AOR
(95% CI)
AOR
(95% CI)
AOR
(95% CI)
AOR
(95% CI)
Ghana0.8
(0.6–1.06)
0.5
(0.3–0.9)
0.8
(0.6–1.1)
2.3
(1.7–3.1)
2.0
(1.3–3.2)
0.7
(0.5–1.1)
1.0
(0.7–1.4)
Guinea 3.6
(1.9–6.9)
5.2
(1.8–14.4)
2.7
(1.3–5.5)
3.2
(1.6–6.4)
1.3
(0.6–2.5)
0.8
(0.4–1.7)
1.0
(0.5–2.3)
Nigeria1.2
(0.8–1.6)
1.0
(0.6–1.5)
1.1
(0.8–1.6)
1.2
(0.8–1.7)
1.8
(0.9–3.2)
1.3
(0.8–2.0)
0.6
(0.3–0.9)
  • Bold=significant Χ2 at p<0.05.

  • *AORs adjusted for maternal age, education, marital status and parity.

  • †Reference is labour companion present at any point during care.

  • ‡Myanmar is not included in the model because 99.7% of women reported having a labour companion.

  • AOR, adjusted OR.