Mixed logit regression results for discrete choice experiment
Attributes | Level | (1) | WTA (95% CI) | (2) | (3) | |||
Only attributes | Interaction with low service use | Interaction with poor | ||||||
Mean | SD | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | |||
Cash transfer amount (‘000 Indian rupees) | Cash | 0.357** | 0.393** | 0.338** | ||||
(0.014) | (0.022) | −0.017 | ||||||
Antenatal care visits | 8 visits | 0.032 | 0.123 | 0.057 | ||||
(Reference: 4 visits) | (0.063) | (0.099) | (0.082) | |||||
12 visits | −0.070 | −0.031 | −0.045 | |||||
(0.065) | (0.099) | (0.084) | ||||||
Growth-monitoring visits/year | 8 visits | −0.206** | 0.118 | 144* | −0.382** | 0.352 | −0.322** | −0.262 |
(Reference: 4 visits) | (0.066) | (0.424) | (54 to 233) | (0.105) | (0.217) | −0.086 | (0.210) | |
12 visits | −0.107* | −0.001 | 38* | −0.214** | −0.004 | −0.148* | −0.003 | |
(0.063) | (0.096) | (−5 to 80) | (0.095) | (0.123) | (0.081) | (0.110) | ||
Duration of visit (hours) | 4 hours | −0.344** | 0.001 | 321* | −0.351** | −0.036 | −0.353** | −0.015 |
(Reference: 1 hour) | (0.062) | (0.150) | (206 to 437) | (0.096) | (0.146) | (0.081) | (0.168) | |
8 hours | −0.178** | 0.014 | 71* | −0.168* | 0.001 | −0.133* | 0.029 | |
(0.061) | (0.206) | (23 to 120) | (0.095) | (0.251) | (0.079) | (0.219) | ||
Health benefit received | Fair | 0.406** | −0.009 | −1137 | 0.485** | 0.046 | 0.495** | −0.048 |
(Reference: poor) | (0.063) | (0.166) | (−41 to 643) | (0.097) | (0.380) | (0.081) | (0.262) | |
Good | 1.019** | 0.599** | −2854 | 1.054** | 0.731** | 1.204** | 0.682** | |
(0.072) | (0.104) | (–3225 to –2484) | (0.114) | (0.126) | (0.098) | (0.120) | ||
Interaction of attribute X low service use (ref: ‘adequate service use’ /poor (ref: ‘non-poor’) | ||||||||
Cash X | 0.186** | 0.426 | 0.337** | 0.444** | ||||
(0.057) | (0.051) | (0.068) | (0.055) | |||||
Growth monitoring: 8 visits X | 0.397** | 0.425 | 0.483** | −0.206 | ||||
(0.167) | (0.337) | (0.177) | (0.557) | |||||
Growth monitoring: 12 visits X | 0.285* | 0.049 | 0.237 | −0.059 | ||||
(0.150) | (0.242) | (0.159) | (0.254) | |||||
Health benefit: fair X | 0.096 | 0.423** | 0.01 | 0.250 | ||||
(0.152) | (0.211) | (0.155) | (0.327) | |||||
Health benefit: good X | 0.445** | −0.378 | −0.074 | 0.381 | ||||
(0.195) | (0.268) | (0.185) | (0.304) | |||||
Observations | 7290 | 7290 | 7290 | |||||
Log likelihood | −1779 | −1704 | −1701 | |||||
AIC | 3577 | 3372 | 3437 |
(1)*p<0.10, **p<0.05; (2) SD is the SD ofthe random coefficient, only SD for statistically significant attributes shown; (3) SE in parenthesis; (4) WTA estimates are in rupees (US$1=INR70), WTA estimated only for statisticallysignificant attributes; (5) to be concise, interaction results are only shownfor statistically significant interaction.
*WTA estimates are per visit.
AIC, Akaike information criterion; INR, Indian rupee; WTA, willing to accept.