Efficacy of named interventions evaluated more than once
Intervention | Number RCTs | Number QE | Intervention studies | Risk of bias | Countries | WB country income | SRHR domain 1–7† | Outcome level/conclusions (+: positive effect; −: nil effect, −: some positive/nil effects) | |||
Behavioural | Attitudinal | Biological | Overall | ||||||||
C-Change | 2 | 0 | 152 Schuler (2012)* | High | Tanzania | LIC | 1 | – | + | +- | |
153 Schuler (2012)* | High | Guatemala | MIC | 1 | – | + | |||||
Coaching Boys into Men | 1 | 1 | 121 Miller (2012) | Some concerns | USA | HIC | 6 | +− | +− | +− | |
122 Miller (2014)* | Moderate | India | MIC | 7 | +− | +− | |||||
35 Das (2012)* | Serious | India | MIC | 7 | +− | + | |||||
Duluth Model | 6 | 2 | 56 Feder (2000) | High | USA | HIC | 7 | - | - | – | |
57 Feder (2002) | High | - | - | ||||||||
58 Feder (2004) | High | - | - | ||||||||
110 Labriola (2005) | High | USA | HIC | 7 | – | ||||||
36 Davis (2000)* | High | USA | HIC | 7 | +− | ||||||
164 Taylor (2009)* | High | USA | HIC | 7 | +− | ||||||
119 Maxwell (2004)* | High | USA | HIC | 7 | + | ||||||
163 Taylor (2001)* | High | USA | HIC | 7 | +− | ||||||
75 Harrel (1991)* | Serious | USA | HIC | 7 | – | – | |||||
112 Lin (2009)* | Serious | Nepal | LIC | 7 | +− | ||||||
Male Norms Initiative | 0 | 2 | 141 Pulerwitz (2006) | Serious | Brazil | MIC | 4 to 7 | + | + | + | + |
142 Pulerwitz (2010) | Moderate | USA | HIC | 4 to 7 | + | + | |||||
Program H | 0 | 4 | 141 Pulerwitz (2006)* | Serious | Brazil | MIC | 3 | + | + | + | + |
142 Pulerwitz (2010)* | Serious | Ethiopia | LIC | 4 to 7 | + | + | |||||
169 Verma (2008)* | Moderate | India | MIC | 3 | + | + | |||||
85 Instituto Promundo (2012)* | Serious | Brazil, India, Chile | MIC, HIC | 7 | + | + | |||||
Safe Dates | 2 | 0 | 60 Foshee (1998) | High | USA | HIC | 6 | + | + | +− | +− |
61 Foshee (2000) | High | – | +− | ||||||||
63 Foshee (2005) | High | + | + | ||||||||
62 Foshee (2004)* | High | USA | HIC | 6 | – | ||||||
Stepping Stones | 3 | 1 | 91 Jewkes (2008) | High | South Africa | MIC | 4 to 7 | +− | +− | +− | |
85 Instituto Promundo (2012)* | Serious | Brazil, India, Chile | MIC, HIC | 7 | + | + | |||||
152 Schuler (2012)* | High | Tanzania | LIC | 1 | – | + | |||||
153 Schuler (2012)* | High | Guatemala | MIC | 1 | – | + |
*Study/Paper examines adaptation or element of intervention.
†WHO SRHR domains: (1) helping people realise their desired family size; (2) ensuring the health of pregnant women/girls and their new-born infants; (3) preventing unsafe abortion; (4) promoting sexual health and well-being; (5) promoting sexual and reproductive health in disease outbreaks; (6) promoting healthy adolescence for a healthy future; (7) preventing and responding to violence against women/girls.
HIC, high-income country; LIC, low-income country; MIC, middle-income country; ; QE, quasi-experimental study; RCT, randomised controlled trial; SRHR, sexual and reproductive health and rights; WB, World Bank.