Table 3

Intervention effects on morbidity and access to care outcomes

CountryDesign*Population/condition†Reported measure of effect (95% CIs)‡Calculated RR (95% CIs)§
Prevalence of infectious diseases¶
DR52cNRCTDiarrhoea, children under twoAOR=0.99 (0.59 to 1.67)0.95 (0.61 to 1.47)
India48cRCTInfant** diarrhoeaARR=0.63 (0.49 to 0.80)0.63 (0.54 to 0.74)
India48cRCTInfant** pneumoniaARR=0.60 (0.46 to 0.78)0.56 (0.40 to 0.77)
Mali42BAChildhood febrile illnessPR=0.61; p<0.0010.61 (0.51 to 0.73)
Mali43BAChildhood febrile illnessAOR=0.45 (0.32 to 0.62)0.57 (0.47 to 0.68)
Senegal45††CBAMalaria, all agesAOR=0.03 (0.02 to 0.07)0.06 (0.02 to 0.18)
SA39cRCTInfant diarrhoea at 12 weeksRR=1.01 (0.90 to 1.14)1.02 (0.90 to 1.16)
Prevalence of nutritional outcomes‡‡
DR52††cNRCTStunting, children under 2AOR=0.50 (0.22 to 1.10)0.61 (0.33 to 1.11)
DR52††cNRCTOverweight, children under 2AOR=0.43 (0.23 to 0.77)0.69 (0.47 to 1.03)
DR52††cNRCTLAZ scores, children under 2MD=0.21 (-0.02 to 0.44)NA
DR52††cNRCTBAZ scores, children under 2MD=−0.31 (-0.49 to -0.12)NA
India48cRCTInfant stuntingARR=0.99 (0.94 to 1.04)1.03 (0.93 to 1.14)
India48cRCTInfant wastingARR=1.10 (0.90 to 1.36)1.16 (0.93 to 1.46)
SA39cRCTInfant LAZ scores at 12 weeksMD=0.11 (0.03 to 0.19)NA
SA39cRCTInfant WLZ scores at 12 weeksMD=0.01 (-0.07 to 0.09)NA
SA39cRCTInfant WAZ scores at 12 weeksMD=0.09 (0.00 to 0.18)NA
Hospitalisation§§
Bangladesh49††cNRCTFor diarrhoea, all ages% diff=29%; p<0.010.38 (0.34 to 0.41)
DR52cNRCTDuring first 2 years of lifeAOR=1.09 (0.70 to 1.68)1.07 (0.77 to 1.49)
India48cRCTDuring infancy**ARR=0.67 (0.51 to 0.88)0.65 (0.46 to 0.91)
SA39cRCTFor infant diarrhoea at 12 weeksRR=1.28 (0.75 to 2.19)1.26 (0.67 to 2.39)
Access to effective¶¶ treatment
DR52cNRCTDiarrhoea, children under twoAOR=3.86 (1.14 to 13.02)1.29 (0.79 to 2.12)
India48††cRCTInfant** diarrhoeaARR=1.22 (1.06 to 1.42)1.25 (1.11 to 1.41)
India48††cRCTInfant** pneumoniaARR=1.44 (1.00 to 2.08)1.24 (0.71 to 2.14)
Access to prompt*** treatment
India48††cRCTInfant** diarrhoeaARR=0.99 (0.89 to 1.10)1.00 (0.88 to 1.14)
India48††cRCTInfant** pneumoniaARR=1.10 (0.96 to 1.25)1.01 (0.84 to 1.22)
Mali42††BAChildhood malariaPR=1.89; p=0.01951.89 (1.18 to 3.05)
Mali43††BAChildhood malariaAOR=3.20 (1.75 to 5.85)2.39 (1.49 to 3.83)
  • *The study design reported is the nature of the comparative data in this review.

  • †Neonatal period is 0–27 days, infant period is 0–11 months and childhood is under 5 years of age, unless otherwise indicated.

  • ‡The BA studies42 43 50 reported each annual time point compared with baseline; here we present effect estimates comparing end-line to baseline.

  • §For CBA, cRCT and cNRCT study designs, risks were calculated and compared for the postintervention period between intervention and control groups; for BA designs, intervention risk was calculated at end-line and control risk at baseline. Risk ratios and 95% CIs are adjusted for clustering.

  • ¶For the Dominican Republic,52 India,48 Mali42 43 and South Africa39 studies, prevalence based on mother’s reporting of condition during 2 weeks period preceding the interview; for the Senegal45 study, prevalence measured at each time point by positive rapid diagnostic test of symptomatic community members.

  • **The India48 study also reported effects of similar magnitude at 6 months of age; results not shown. Study found a reduction in neonatal morbidity: danger signs (ARR=0.82; 95% CIs: 0.67 to 0.99) and infection (ARR=0.91; 95% CIs: 0.71 to 1.17), and an increase in access to care for neonates: treatment by appropriate provider for danger signs (ARR=1.76; 95% CIs: 1.36 to 2.24), prompt treatment for danger signs (ARR=1.14; 95% CIs: 1.10 to 1.18), treatment by appropriate provider for infections (ARR=4.86; 95% CIs: 3.80 to 6.21) and prompt treatment for infections (ARR=1.97; 95% CIs: 1.71 to 2.27).

  • ††Study primary outcome(s).

  • ‡‡Based on anthropometric measures for all studies.

  • §§Measure based on mother’s recall for Dominican Republic52 (last 12 months), India48 (last 3 months) and South Africa39 (recall period not specified) studies; for the Bangladesh49 study, measure based on hospital records. CHWs in the Dominican Republic52 and South Africa39 studies did not provide doorstep treatment but referred all cases detected; CHWs in the Bangladesh49 and India48 studies provided doorstep treatment and referral.

  • ¶¶Defined for the Dominican Republic52 study as oral rehydration for childhood diarrhoea, and for the India48 study as treatment from an appropriate provider, which included physicians in government and private facilities, auxiliary nurse midwife, Anganwadi worker (CHW) or ASHA.48

  • ***Defined as treatment within 24 hours of symptom onset for all studies.

  • AOR, adjusted OR; ARR, adjusted risk ratio; ASHA, accredited social health activists; BA, before–after; BAZ, Body Mass Index-for-age; CBA, controlled before–after; CHW, community health worker; cNRCT, cluster non-randomised controlled trial; cRCT, cluster randomised controlled trial; LAZ, length-for-age; MD, mean difference; NA, not applicable; RR, risk ratio; WAZ, weight-for-age; WLZ, weight-for-length.