Table 3

Comparison of iron folic acid supplementation and haemoglobin concentration in the baseline versus endline surveys*

IFA supplementation, nBaselineEndlineMinimally adjusted OR or minimally adjusted mean difference† (95% CI)P valueFully adjusted OR or fully adjusted mean difference‡ (95% CI)P value
1385922
Knowledge of anaemia
 Yes596 (43.1%)744 (81.4%)5.4 (2.5 to 11.8)<0.00015.7 (2.5 to 13.3)0.0001
 No787 (56.9%)170 (18.6%)RefRef
Knew benefits of IFA§
 Yes316 (53.2%)484 (65.0%)3.2 (1.6 to 6.5)0.0014.5 (1.9 to 10.6)0.0009
 No278 (46.8%)259 (35.0%)RefRef
Reportedly received IFA during current pregnancy
 Yes633 (45.8%)552 (60.0%)2.6 (1.2 to 5.4)0.012.7 (1.2 to 6.1)0.02
 No748 (54.2%)368 (40.0%)RefRef
Reportedly adhered to IFA supplementation
 Yes455 (32.8%)428 (46.4%)2.4 (1.1 to 5.3)0.042.8 (1.2 to 6.5)0.02
 No930 (67.2%)494 (53.6%)RefRef
Anaemia, n920555
 Haemoglobin (g/L)¶96.7±2.295.6±2.5−0.1 (–0.5 to 0.3)0.60−0.2 (–0.6 to 0.2)0.30
 Anaemia prevalence**
 Anaemic724 (79.5%)426 (78.2%)1.2 (0.6 to 2.8)0.601.4 (0.6 to 3.6)0.41
 Non-anaemic187 (20.5%)119 (21.8%)RefRef
  • *Results are presented as N (%) or mean±SE.

  • †Minimally adjusted model: adjusted for year, season, village and a variable indicating if a participant was enrolled in the baseline or in the endline survey because of the nature of the study design.

  • ‡Fully adjusted model: multivariable logistic regression, adjusted for all the covariates in addition to year, season, village and a variable indicating if a participant was enrolled in the baseline or in the endline survey.

  • §Among pregnant women, who responded that they knew anemia, locally known as ‘not having enough blood’, n= 594 in the baseline survey and n=743 in the endline survey.

  • ¶The mean difference compares endline to baseline.

  • **Anemia is defined as haemoglobin concentration <110 g/L if first and third trimester of gestation; <105 g/L if second trimester of gestation.

  • IFA, iron folic acid.