Exposure to Samvedana Plus intervention among FSWs from intervention arm
| Endline data (n=288) | Programme data (n=425) | |
| N | n (%) | n (%) |
| Ever received individual counselling on various issues/aspects within IP relationship | 162 (56.3) | 362 (85.2) |
| Frequency of ever received individual counselling on various issues/aspects within the IP relationship | ||
| None | 126 (43.8) | |
| One to two times | 25 (08.7) | |
| Three to four times | 47 (16.3) | |
| Five or more times | 90 (31.3) | |
| Received individual counselling on various issues/aspects within the IP relationship in the past 6 months | 147 (51.2) | 318 (74.8) |
| Frequency of individual counselling on various issues/aspects within the IP relationship in the past 6 months | ||
| None | 141 (49.0) | |
| One to two times | 57 (19.8) | |
| Three to four times | 42 (14.6) | |
| Five or more times | 48 (16.7) | |
| Ever received couple counselling on various issues/aspects within the IP relationship | 35 (12.2) | 113 (26.6) |
| Frequency of ever received couple counselling on various issues/aspects within the IP relationship | ||
| None | 253 (87.8) | |
| One time | 7 (2.4) | |
| Two or more times | 28 (9.7) | |
| Have any of your IPs ever received individual counselling on issues/aspects within the IP relationship* | 38 (13.2) | 328 (77.2) |
| Ever attended training on leadership during the last 2 years | 37 (12.8) | 78 (18.4) |
| Ever attended group reflection sessions on issues/aspects within the IP relationship | 198 (68.8) | 346 (81.4) |
| Frequency of ever attended group reflection sessions on issues/aspects within the IP relationship | ||
| None | 92 (31.9) | |
| One to three sessions | 58 (20.1) | |
| Four to six sessions | 75 (26.0) | |
| Seven or more sessions | 63 (21.9) | |
| Ever attended any folk media show on the issues/aspects of intimate relationship | 117 (40.6) | † |
| Ever attended any campaign, rally or mass event on the issues/aspects of intimate relationship | 62 (21.5) | † |
*Endline data are based on responses from sex workers, whereas the monitoring data are based on male outreach worker reporting who provided the services to the IPs of the female sex workers.
†These activities were conducted at the village level where all the villagers participated; data are not disaggregated by experience of sex work.
FSW, female sex worker; IP, intimate partner.