Competencies with differences in mean proficiency scores comparing sub-groups of respondents based on their self-reported proficiency level
| Domain and competencies (based on V.2.0 of framework) | Global F, P value |
| Domain: Identify emerging challenges related to implementation of evidence-supported IDoP interventions | |
| 2.3. Identify the potential impact of scaling down (aka de-implementing) an ineffective but often used intervention for addressing that outcome. | 0.04 |
| 2.4.2. Be able to strategise to address inequities specific to the implementation of a given set of efficacious interventions, and thereby achieving the desired health outcome. | 0.02 |
| Domain: Identify and engage relevant stakeholders | |
| 3.1.1. Understand key constructs of participatory research, that is, collaborative, equitable, community-based, co-learning, capacity building and so on. | 0.04 |
| 3.3.1. Be aware of models and methods for facilitating stakeholders’ engagement and participation in IR process. | 0.03 |
| 3.3.2. Be able to engage stakeholder groups appropriately to gather perspectives and opinions. | 0.02 |
| 3.3.3. Be able to incorporate stakeholder input into IR practice. | 0.03 |
| Domain: Conduct and evaluate IR in a robust, rigorous and ethical manner | |
| 8.5.1. Identify potential ethical issues in IR such as safety of participants, power relationships, literacy, disruption of services. | 0.03 |
| Domain: Communicate and advocate effectively throughout the IR process | |
| 10.3.2. Understand methods of scaling up and what is required for each such as technical assistance, interactive systems, novel incentives and ‘pull’ strategies. | 0.03 |
IDoP, infectious diseases of poverty; IR, implementation research.