Table 4

Unadjusted and adjusted associations between sociodemographic characteristics, gestational age at abortion and abortion-related maternal death

Women who died of abortion*
(n=253)
Women who survived abortion*
(n=89 194)
Unadjusted OR (95% CI)†
Missing indicator
(n=89 443)
P valueAdjusted OR ‡ (95% CI)†
Missing indicator
(n=89 443)
P value§
Maternal age (years)
 15–1936 (13.5)3591 (4.0)6.53 (1.71 to 24.95)<0.0017.79 (2.73 to 22.23)<0.001
 20–2459 (23.6)25 775 (28.9)3.13 (1.06 to 9.22)4.29 (2.00 to 9.20)
 25–2954 (19.9)29 310 (32.3)1.00 (ref)1.00 (ref)
 30–3442 (17.0)17 640 (19.8)0.8 (0.31 to 2.04)1.12 (0.63 to 1.96)
 35–3938 (15.6)8975 (10.2)4.1 (1.18 to 14.28)5.95 (2.11 to 16.81)
 40–4416 (5.7)2903 (3.5)1.51 (0.55 to 4.16)2.07 (1.06 to 4.07)
 ≥458 (4.8)1000 (1.3)3.52 (1.1 to 11.22)4.35 (1.77 to 10.67)
 Missing0 (0.0)0 (0)N/AN/A
Place of residence
 Urban24 (13.0)16 601 (21.4)1.00 (ref)<0.0011.00 (ref)<0.001
 Rural225 (86.2)72 593 (78.6)4.56 (2.46 to 8.47)3.28 (1.76 to 6.11)
 Missing4 (0.4)0 (0)N/AN/A
 Religion
 Hindu202 (81.5)73 340 (81.0)1.00 (ref)0.41931.00 (ref)0.1618
 Others48 (18.9)15 712 (22.2)0.82 (0.33 to 2.02)0.94 (0.35 to 2.55)
 Missing3 (0.8)142 (0.2)N/AN/A¶
Social group
 Others167 (68.5)64 591 (73.2)1.00 (ref)0.01381.00 (ref)0.0035
 Schedule caste48 (18.5)16 656 (19.9)1.38 (0.52 to 3.66)1.25 (0.43 to 3.60)
 Schedule tribe35 (11.8)7805 (6.8)4.77 (1.74 to 13.05)4.06 (1.39 to 11.87)
 Missing3 (1.1)143 (0.2)N/AN/A¶
Wealth/asset index
 5: Highest45 (22.4)20 678 (23.3)1.00 (ref)<0.0011.00 (ref)<0.001
 447 (16.9)18 242 (20.4)0.86 (0.53 to 1.40)0.65 (0.39 to 1.10)
 352 (18.8)16 452 (19.1)5.81 (2.76 to 12.22)3.81 (1.86 to 7.83)
 254 (18.7)14 646 (15.9)2.18 (0.85 to 5.61)1.33 (0.50 to 3.57)
 1: Lowest44 (18.7)12 799 (14.1)3.56 (1.42 to 8.92)2.08 (0.73 to 5.94)
 Missing11 (4.5)6377 (7.1)N/A0.33 (0.16 to 0.70)
Gestational month
 <5 months205 (77.8)86 792 (97.2)1.00 (ref)<0.0011.00 (ref)<0.001
 ≥5 months21 (10.1)2337 (2.7)1.87 (0.97 to 3.61)1.58 (0.80 to 3.13)
 Missing27 (6.0)65 (0.1)N/AN/A¶
  • *Frequencies are unweighted (true counts). Rates/proportions are weighted for survey design and clustering effects.

  • †The 95% CIs were calculated using linearised standard errors.

  • ‡Multivariable logistic regression, adjusting for the other variables/potential risk factors in the final model.

  • § P value for a Wald test indicating whether the incremental adjustment for an independent variable significantly improves the fit of the model.

  • ¶N/As are shown because the OR associated with the missing category was extremely large, which can be explained by the small number of missing values in each group.

  • **P value for a t-test showing the significance level for the overall univariable regression model.