Table 3

Adjusted cross-sectional comparison of service utilisation and source of care in voucher versus comparison counties

	Period 1		Period 2		Period 3
	Adjusted OR* (95% CI)	P values	Adjusted OR* (95% CI)	P values	Adjusted OR* (95% CI)	P values
Service utilisation
4+ ANC visits	1.12 (0.94 to 1.34)	0.201	1.18 (0.99 to 1.40)	0.072	1.46 (1.11 to 1.90)	0.006
Facility delivery	1.18 (0.85 to 1.64)	0.315	1.65 (1.14 to 2.37)	0.008	1.47 (0.91 to 2.39)	0.115
PNC	1.13 (0.89 to 1.46)	0.308	1.37 (1.01 to 1.86)	0.043	1.73 (1.25 to 2.40)	0.001
Complete care	1.20 (0.95 to 1.51)	0.130	1.34 (1.02 to 1.75)	0.037	1.58 (1.20 to 2.10)	0.002
Recommended care	1.02 (0.75 to 1.41)	0.871	1.07 (0.79 to 1.44)	0.674	1.68 (1.23 to 2.31)	0.001
Private sector market share
ANC†	1.46 (0.86 to 2.48)	0.158	2.11 (1.27 to 3.49)	0.004	2.71 (1.38 to 5.31)	0.004
Facility delivery	1.32 (0.84 to 2.07)	0.220	2.02 (1.33 to 3.07)	0.001	2.26 (1.36 to 3.73)	0.002
PNC	1.44 (0.92 to 2.28)	0.110	2.44 (1.55 to 3.84)	<0.001	2.59 (1.47 to 4.54)	0.001
Complete care‡	1.33 (0.89 to 2.00)	0.167	2.45 (1.58 to 3.78)	<0.001	2.51 (1.50 to 4.20)	0.001
Recommended care‡	1.70 (0.88 to 3.27)	0.112	2.59 (1.45 to 4.61)	0.001	3.04 (1.43 to 6.46)	0.004

*Logistic regression model adjusted for woman’s age at birth, education, wealth, residence, marital status, employment, parity and multistage sampling at the county sublocation, village and mother levels.
†Among users of 4+ ANC visits.
‡Proportion of users who received care from the private sector for at least one service in the 4+ ANC, delivery care and PNC continuum.
ANC, antenatal care; PNC, postnatal care.