Table 6

A comparison of the performance of UVA, MEWS and qSOFA scores by population subgroups of patients pooled from hospital-based cohort studies conducted in six African countries from 2009 to 2015

ScoreAll
(n=5573)
HIV serostatus known
(n=3402)
HIV-infected
(n=2122)
HIV-uninfected
(n=1280)
Suspected infection
(n=3153)
No diagnosis
(n=2420)
UVA, AUC (95% CI)0.77 (0.75 to 0.79)0.78 (0.76 to 0.80)0.72 (0.69 to 0.75)0.82 (0.77 to 0.87)0.75 (0.72 to 0.77)0.74 (0.70 to 0.78)
MEWS, AUC (95% CI)0.70 (0.68 to 0.71)0.67 (0.65 to 0.70)0.61 (0.59 to 0.64)0.69 (0.63 to 0.74)0.65 (0.63 to 0.68)0.68 (0.64 to 0.72)
qSOFA, AUC (95% CI)0. 69 (0.67 to 0.72)0.69 (0.66 to 0.71)0.64 (0.61 to 0.68)0.70 (0.63 to 0.76)0.68 (0.65 to 0.71)0.62 (0.57 to 0.66)
  • AUC, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve; MEWS, modified early warning score; qSOFA, quick sepsis-related organ failure assessment; UVA, universal vital assessment.