TY - JOUR T1 - Exploring the translation process for multilingual implementation research studies: a collaborative autoethnography JF - BMJ Global Health JO - BMJ Global Health DO - 10.1136/bmjgh-2022-008674 VL - 7 IS - 5 SP - e008674 AU - Victoria Haldane AU - Betty Peiyi Li AU - Shiliang Ge AU - Jason Zekun Huang AU - Hongyu Huang AU - Losang Sadutshang AU - Zhitong Zhang AU - Pande Pasang AU - Jun Hu AU - Xiaolin Wei Y1 - 2022/05/01 UR - http://gh.bmj.com/content/7/5/e008674.abstract N2 - Introduction In an increasingly globalised and interconnected world, evidence to evaluate complex interventions may be generated in multiple languages. However, despite its influence in shaping the evidence base, there is little literature explicitly connecting the translation process to the goals and processes of implementation research. This study aims to explore the processes and experience of an international implementation research team conducting a process evaluation of a complex intervention in Tibet Autonomous Region, China.Methods This study uses a collaborative autoethnographic approach to explore the translation process from Chinese or Tibetan to English of key stakeholder interview transcripts. In this approach, multiple researchers and translators contributed their reflections, and conducted joint analysis through dialogue, reflection and with consideration of multiple perspectives. Seven researchers involved with the translation process contributed their perspectives through in-depth interviews or written reflections and jointly analysed the resulting data.Results We describe the translation process, synthesise key challenges including developing a ‘voice’ and tone as a translator, conveying the depth of idioms across languages, and distance from the study context. We further offer lessons learnt including the importance of word banks with unified translations of words and phrases created iteratively during the translation process, the need to collaborate between translators and the introspective work necessary for translators to explore their positionality and reflexivity during the work. We then offer a summary of these learnings for other implementation research teams.Conclusion Our findings emphasise that in order to ensure rigour in their work, implementation research teams using qualitative data should make concerted effort to consider both the translation process as well as its outcomes. Given the numerous multinational or multilingual implementation research studies using qualitative methods, there is a need for further consideration and reflection on the translation process.All data relevant to the study are included in the article or uploaded as online supplemental information. N/A. ER -