@article {Stiermane006698, author = {Elizabeth K Stierman and Saifuddin Ahmed and Solomon Shiferaw and Linnea A Zimmerman and Andreea A Creanga}, title = {Measuring facility readiness to provide childbirth care: a comparison of indices using data from a health facility survey in Ethiopia}, volume = {6}, number = {10}, elocation-id = {e006698}, year = {2021}, doi = {10.1136/bmjgh-2021-006698}, publisher = {BMJ Specialist Journals}, abstract = {Background Actionable information about the readiness of health facilities is needed to inform quality improvement efforts in maternity care, but there is no consensus on the best approach to measure readiness. Many countries use the WHO{\textquoteright}s Service Availability and Readiness Assessment (SARA) or the Demographic and Health Survey (DHS) Programme{\textquoteright}s Service Provision Assessment to measure facility readiness. This study compares measures of childbirth service readiness based on SARA and DHS guidance to an index based on WHO{\textquoteright}s quality of maternal and newborn care standards.Methods We used cross-sectional data from Performance Monitoring for Action Ethiopia{\textquoteright}s 2019 survey of 406 health facilities providing childbirth services. We calculated childbirth service readiness scores using items based on SARA, DHS and WHO standards. For each, we used three aggregation methods for generating indices: simple addition, domain-weighted addition and principal components analysis. We compared central tendency, spread and item variation between the readiness indices; concordance between health facility scores and rankings; and correlations between readiness scores and delivery volume.Results Indices showed moderate agreement with one another, and all had a small but significant positive correlation with monthly delivery volume. Ties were more frequent for indices with fewer items. More than two-thirds of items in the relatively shorter SARA and DHS indices were widely (\>90\%) available in hospitals, and half of the SARA items were widely (\>90\%) available in health centres/clinics. Items based on the WHO standards showed greater variation and captured unique aspects of readiness (eg, quality improvement processes, actionable information systems) not included in either the SARA or DHS indices.Conclusion SARA and DHS indices rely on a small set of widely available items to assess facility readiness to provide childbirth care. Expanded selection of items based on the WHO standards can better differentiate between levels of service readiness.Data are publicly available at https://www.pmadata.org/data/request-access-datasets.}, URL = {https://gh.bmj.com/content/6/10/e006698}, eprint = {https://gh.bmj.com/content/6/10/e006698.full.pdf}, journal = {BMJ Global Health} }