PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Tarun K George AU - John Victor Peter AU - Lakshmanan Jeyaseelan AU - Bijesh Yadav AU - Shalom Patole AU - Roshine Mary Koshy AU - Prabhu Joseph AU - Balasubramanian P AU - Aravindan Nair AU - Anand Zachariah AU - Krupa George AU - Georgi Abraham AU - Balasubramanian Venkatesh TI - The impact of demonetisation on the utilisation of hospital services, patient outcomes and finances: a multicentre observational study from India AID - 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-002509 DP - 2020 Sep 01 TA - BMJ Global Health PG - e002509 VI - 5 IP - 9 4099 - http://gh.bmj.com/content/5/9/e002509.short 4100 - http://gh.bmj.com/content/5/9/e002509.full SO - BMJ Global Health2020 Sep 01; 5 AB - Background This study assessed trends in healthcare utilisation in relation to the implementation of an economic policy in India wherein 500 and 1000 rupee notes were demonetised.Methods In this ambidirectional observational study of private not-for-profit hospitals, data on hospital outpatient and inpatient numbers, surgeries, emergency department (ED) visits, obstetric admissions and mortality were obtained for pre-demonetisation (September/October 2016), early (November/December 2016) and late demonetisation (January/February 2017), and post-demonetisation periods (March/April 2017) and compared with the control period (2015–2016) from 11 centres (three tertiary hospitals; eight secondary). A Bayesian regression analysis was performed to adjust for seasonal (winter) effect. Monthly financial data, including the proportion of cash versus non-cash transactions, were collected.Findings Overall, at the pooled all-hospital level, Bayesian analysis showed non-significant increase in outpatients (535.4, 95% CI −7097 to 8116) and decrease in deaths (–6.3 per 1000 inpatients, 95% CI −15.45 to 2.75) and a significant decrease in inpatients (−145.6, 95% CI −286.4 to −10.63) during demonetisation. Analysis at the level of secondary and tertiary hospitals showed a variable effect. For individual hospitals, after adjusting for the seasonal effect, some hospitals observed a significant reduction in outpatient (n=2) and inpatient (n=3) numbers, ED visits (n=4) and mortality (n=2) during demonetisation, while others reported significantly increased outpatient numbers (n=3) and ED visits (n=2). Deliveries remained unchanged during demonetisation in the hospitals that provided the service. There was no significant reduction in hospital incomes during demonetisation. In tertiary hospitals, there was a significant increase in non-cash component of transactions from 35% to 60% (p=0.02) that persisted beyond the demonetisation period.Conclusions The effect of demonetisation on healthcare utilisation was variable. Some hospitals witnessed a significant reduction in utilisation in some areas, while others reported increased utilisation. There was an increase in non-cash transactions that persisted beyond the period of demonetisation.