TY - JOUR T1 - PO 8441 EXPERIMENTAL COMPARISON OF SENSITIVITY OF LAMP AND REAL-TIME PCR JF - BMJ Global Health SP - A37 LP - A38 DO - 10.1136/bmjgh-2019-EDC.98 VL - 4 IS - Suppl 3 AU - Jacques Kaboré AU - Hamidou Ilboudo AU - Charlie FA Compaoré AU - Oumou Camara AU - Mohamed Bamba AU - Hassane Sakandé AU - Mamadou Camara AU - Bruno Bucheton AU - Dramane Kaba AU - Vincent Jamonneau AU - Stijn Deborggraeve AU - Veerle Lejon Y1 - 2019/04/01 UR - http://gh.bmj.com/content/4/Suppl_3/A37.3.abstract N2 - Background Human African trypanosomiasis, or sleeping sickness, remains a serious problem in tropical Africa. Timely diagnosis of this disease requires systematic population screening, particularly for Trypanosoma brucei gambiense, which has a long asymptomatic period.The lack of sensitivity and specificity of conventional diagnostic tests has led in recent years to the use of molecular tools. Amplification of parasite-specific DNA sequences significantly improved diagnosis of infection. However, these molecular tools still have some limitations especially in the case of low parasitaemia. Furthermore, research is still needed to make molecular detection a real control tool for the fight against sleeping sickness. The purpose of this study is to determine the threshold of sensitivity of real-time PCR using the 18S and TgsGp primers and of the LAMP technique, applied in the DiTECT-HAT project as molecular reference tests.Methods We used serial dilutions containing 0, 1, 10, 100, 103, 104, 105, 106 parasites per ml of blood. Samples were extracted, and DNA was amplified.Results The analytical sensitivity of the 18S real-time PCR with the Taqman probe of the filter paper samples is 100 parasites/ml and that of the TgsGp real-time PCR with the Taqman probe of filter paper samples is 104 parasites/ml. For Lamp technique, the analytical sensitivity is 103 parasites/ml.Conclusion This study shows that a ‘negative PCR’ would not mean ‘no parasite’. It suggests that DNA detection techniques should still be improved. ER -