@article {Vande Maelee001497, author = {Nathalie Vande Maele and Ke Xu and Agnes Soucat and Lisa Fleisher and Maria Aranguren and Hong Wang}, title = {Measuring primary healthcare expenditure in low-income and lower middle-income countries}, volume = {4}, number = {1}, elocation-id = {e001497}, year = {2019}, doi = {10.1136/bmjgh-2019-001497}, publisher = {BMJ Specialist Journals}, abstract = {Primary healthcare (PHC) is considered as the pathway to Universal Health Coverage (UHC) and to achieving sustainable development goals. Measuring PHC expenditure is a critical first step to understanding why some countries improve access to health services, provide financial risk protection and achieve UHC. In this paper, we tested and examined different measurement options using the System of Health Accounts (SHA) 2011 for systematic monitoring of PHC expenditure. We used the {\textquoteleft}first-contact{\textquoteright} approach to PHC and applied it to the healthcare function or healthcare provider classifications of SHA 2011. Data comes from 36 recent low-income and middle-income countries health accounts 2011{\textendash}2016. Country spending on PHC varies largely, across countries and across definition options. For example, PHC expenditure ranges from US$15 to US$60 per capita. The sensitivity analysis highlighted the weight of including or excluding medical goods. The correlation analysis comparing countries ranking is strong between options. The study identified the major challenges in developing standard monitoring of PHC expenditure. One, there is a lack of clear operational definition for PHC, suggesting that a global standard definition would not replace the need for country context specific definition. Two, there is insufficient data granularity both because the standard framework does not offer it and because quality data breakdown is unavailable.}, URL = {https://gh.bmj.com/content/4/1/e001497}, eprint = {https://gh.bmj.com/content/4/1/e001497.full.pdf}, journal = {BMJ Global Health} }