TY - JOUR T1 - Qualitative evidence synthesis for complex interventions and guideline development: clarification of the purpose, designs and relevant methods JF - BMJ Global Health DO - 10.1136/bmjgh-2018-000882 VL - 4 IS - Suppl 1 SP - e000882 AU - Kate Flemming AU - Andrew Booth AU - Ruth Garside AU - Özge Tunçalp AU - Jane Noyes Y1 - 2019/01/01 UR - http://gh.bmj.com/content/4/Suppl_1/e000882.abstract N2 - This paper is one of a series exploring the implications of complexity for systematic reviews and guideline development, commissioned by the WHO. The paper specifically explores the role of qualitative evidence synthesis. Qualitative evidence synthesis is the broad term for the group of methods used to undertake systematic reviews of qualitative research evidence. As an approach, qualitative evidence synthesis is increasingly recognised as having a key role to play in addressing questions relating to intervention or system complexity, and guideline development processes. This is due to the unique role qualitative research can play in establishing the relative importance of outcomes, the acceptability, fidelity and reach of interventions, their feasibility in different settings and potential consequences on equity across populations. This paper outlines the purpose of qualitative evidence synthesis, provides detail of how qualitative evidence syntheses can help establish understanding and explanation of the complexity that can occur in relation to both interventions and systems, and how qualitative evidence syntheses can contribute to evidence to decision frameworks. It provides guidance for the choice of qualitative evidence synthesis methods in the context of guideline development for complex interventions, giving ‘real life’ examples of where this has occurred. Information to support decision-making around choice qualitative evidence synthesis methods in the context of guideline development is provided. Approaches for reporting qualitative evidence syntheses are discussed alongside mechanisms for assessing confidence in the findings of a review. ER -