TY - JOUR T1 - Universal health coverage, economic slowdown and system resilience: Africa’s policy dilemma JF - BMJ Global Health DO - 10.1136/bmjgh-2017-000400 VL - 2 IS - 3 SP - e000400 AU - Giuliano Russo AU - Gerald Bloom AU - David McCoy Y1 - 2017/08/01 UR - http://gh.bmj.com/content/2/3/e000400.abstract N2 - Summary boxAchieving universal health coverage (UHC) has become a dominant global health policy preoccupation during the last decade, advocating ambitious healthcare coverage goals, increases in health funding and financial pooling mechanisms for social protection;As many commodity-dependent African economies are presently experiencing a marked slowdown and international assistance is becoming more volatile, there seems to be a growing divide between UHC principles and policy-makers’ everyday concerns in the field;In order to keep inspiring health development in Africa, UHC thinking and international health support need to take into account the continent’s non-linear growth pattern and the need to ensure that its health systems are resilient to external shocks;Drawing from past mistakes and from the continent’s reaction to past crises, a number of macro, meso and micro policies can be identified to strengthen the UHC concept, and reconcile its aspirations with Africa’s current economic outlook.Achieving universal health coverage (UHC) has become a dominant policy preoccupation within the global health community. For Africa, progress towards UHC involves ambitious goals for expanding access to a range of effective health services, a substantial increase in health expenditure, and establishing a greater reliance on prepayment and pooling mechanisms to finance healthcare.1 According to one set of calculations, achieving UHC requires countries to spend at least $86 per capita in 2012 dollars on healthcare, and a minimum of 5% of Gross Domestic Product (GDP).2 Clearly, expanding the ‘fiscal space for health’3 will be key to the success of UHC.iThe global UHC movement is welcome and has helped to galvanise political will to tackle the problem of growing health inequities and the impoverishing effect of out-of-pocket health expenditures.4 It also helped refocus attention on the fragmented and inefficient architecture of domestic and international health financing,5 the unpredictability of foreign … ER -