Article Text

Download PDFPDF

90:oral HTA and priority setting for universal health coverage in Ethiopia: progress, setbacks, and prospects
  1. Daniel Erku1,
  2. Befikadu Wubishet2,
  3. Eskindir Eshetu Ali3,
  4. Gebremedhin B Gebretekle4,
  5. Fitsum Sebsibe Teni5
  1. 1Centre for Applied Health Economics; Griffith University; Australia
  2. 2Health Economics Research Fellow – Centre for Health Services Research, University of Queensland
  3. 3School of Pharmacy, Addis Ababa University, Ethiopia
  4. 4Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto; Toronto Health Economics and Technology Assessment Collaborative, University Health Network
  5. 5PhD Candidate – Division of Insurance Medicine at Karolisnka Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden


Although many countries across the globe have reaffirmed their commitments to achieve universal health coverage (UHC) by 2030, countries with very limited healthcare budgets struggle to provide UHC. The already stretched healthcare budget is further compromised by the current global economic crisis caused by COVID-19 and substantial reduction in external funding. Due to this, the use of a systematic approach to allocate scarce healthcare resource – such as via Health technology assessment (HTA) – has become more important than ever before.

In this work, we categorised the challenges and opportunities for HTA institutionalisation in Ethiopia using Kingdon’s multiple streams framework into Problem, Policy and Politics. The problem stream explains how conditions become problems and come to the attention of policy makers. In case of HTA, these include, among others,: i) need for adequate, innovative, and sustainable healthcare financing to achieve UHC and reduce mounting OOP expenditure, ii) need for smart spending due to COVID-19 – induced economic contraction, and uncertainty in donor programming. The policy stream represents the process by which alternative policies are generated and selected. HTA can be put forward as a solution to the ‘problem’ identified above, along with ‘Proof of concept’ HTA projects to test the proposed policy. This stream can be influenced by local capacity; availability and quality of data sources; role of academic institutions in priority setting, etc. The politics stream explains how favourable macro-level political conditions could help set the agenda. Visible, and key policy actors such as the Health Minister are more likely to affect the policy agenda in line with the political priority. These three streams need to come together when a policy window, a moment in time when policies are more likely to come on to the government’s decision agenda, opens for the issue (i.e. HTA institutionalisation).

This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: .

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.